- Aug 6, 2012
- 28,115
- 24,896
- 2,405
So, I have heard this for the last couple of days. However, not ONCE has anyone SOLD this deal. Not once. No stats about how this will decrease climate change. No stats about why it's in the best interest for America to relinquish sovereignty. No explanation as to what other countries have been doing while America decreased their emissions by 19% from 2006 numbers.
The UN, global cabals and the like are not trusted to look after American interest because China has lead the way in undermining them for so long.
I agree that climate is rising, people can hypothesize why, but the bottom line is, this agreement is far too intrusive in the American system, while losing 6 million jobs! Bloody insane. Also, America has to pay nations like India to decrease their carbon emissions, who is excited about this great deal? So tempting...
Update: Rand Paul on CNN now, really putting holes in the climate change theory. Best line "predictions and models keep altering their estimations every couple of years because they are always so far off"
Another good point, "yes, I agree that man can be contributing to global warming, but we don't know how much is man contributed and how much is nature"
Finally, "it's not fair that Russia and other countries can increase their output while America is punished and loses jobs".
Kudos to Jake Tapper having the courage to have Rand Paul on. At least it is a counter argument for once.
The UN, global cabals and the like are not trusted to look after American interest because China has lead the way in undermining them for so long.
I agree that climate is rising, people can hypothesize why, but the bottom line is, this agreement is far too intrusive in the American system, while losing 6 million jobs! Bloody insane. Also, America has to pay nations like India to decrease their carbon emissions, who is excited about this great deal? So tempting...
Update: Rand Paul on CNN now, really putting holes in the climate change theory. Best line "predictions and models keep altering their estimations every couple of years because they are always so far off"
Another good point, "yes, I agree that man can be contributing to global warming, but we don't know how much is man contributed and how much is nature"
Finally, "it's not fair that Russia and other countries can increase their output while America is punished and loses jobs".
Kudos to Jake Tapper having the courage to have Rand Paul on. At least it is a counter argument for once.
Last edited: