Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 109,932
- 99,156
- 3,645
I would agree. The next president will release it.It predict it won’t remain hidden forever. Thank God for leaks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would agree. The next president will release it.It predict it won’t remain hidden forever. Thank God for leaks.
He does not assist much by self smearingWelp, Trump isn't going to let you read the other report.
No, I also read about them in the indictments.You saw them on the media,
The indictments that you say made him waaay more popular?He does not assist much by self smearing
I’m hoping before that, by any means necessary.I would agree. The next president will release it.
Perhaps that’s because most of us are focused on the future.
No threads on this yet? Come on liberals, you're slacking! Get cracking!
Indictments by the kangaroo courts.No, I also read about them in the indictments.
As far as videos and audio recordings, it really doesn't matter where I saw them.
What matters here is that you didn't see them. Because newsmax insulated your brain.
And you will claim any of it as fake. Because you know how stupid you will sound if you do.
Lol, the heck you say! For a group that has been focusing on the actions of trump stemming decades ago...and you claim you are looking to the future?Perhaps that’s because most of us are focused on the future.
I've never seen anything about bribing Biden. It is on the record that Biden extorted Poroshenko to fire Victor Shokin. The narrative that cannot be verified is that Shokin was investigating Burisma who was paying Hunter $83,000/month for no work or expertise of any kind. Pro Obama/Biden media claimed 'experts' in the Ukraine said the timeline didn't fit, but those 'experts' are never named.The most obvious is that Biden was bribed to get Viktor Shokin.
There was some accusation that he was bribed by Americore for something but it's never been clear.
What was the Republican oversight committee talking about all the time? Do they even know?
Wrong again. The court doesn't indict people. Grand juries indict people, based on the evidence.Indictments by the kangaroo courts.
That’s lockstep thinking!Indictments by the kangaroo courts.
Don't hold your breath waiting. Another report was released also, the report on Hunter Biden. While the pardon covers Hunter the content is shall we say not good. The left will use Smith as a deflection from the Biden family issues.
Putin agrees.It’s very easy to fool the useful idiots.
It it’s bribery. They were paying Hunter for a non-existent job, $60-$80k per month. That is called a kick back.
If Trump’s kids were getting paid like that by foreigner for doing nothing you’d be demanding they be thrown in jail.
And he laid out the evidence.
Have you seen any of it?
LOL. Prosecotors kangarooed the charges while presenting to a grand jury in deep blue areas, not even providing any defenses in the process.Wrong again. The court doesn't indict people. Grand juries indict people, based on the evidence.
You're really flailing. Literally every post by you has been substantively false. Like, not even close.
Another stupid lie. The slam dunk indictment came in Florida, for example.LOL. Prosecotors kangarooed the charges while presenting to a grand jury in deep blue areas, not even providing any defenses in the process.
Um, first of all, better check when the indictments were handed down. You're kind of stumbling.Why did the DoJ not prosecute Trump in 2021?
Why did the DoJ not prosecute Trump in 2022?
Why did the DoJ not prosecute Trump in 2023?