SJW's have ruined Movies/TVseries

[hadit]

I cannot imagine how much you people's lives must suck in that you cannot even watch a TV show or movie without viewing it through your myopic political prism.

Is there any part of your lives that you do not tie directly to politics? Are you thinking about Trump when you have sex with your significant others?

tRumplings don't have sex.

That's why they're mythical beings.

 

[The Original Tree]

Too bad our wonderful President isn't putting an end to the SJW culture the way Hitler did to the twisted Weimar culture.

I can sympathize with the German people of the era getting fed up with the wantonness of the time.

Isn't it a little early for you to start drinking, Tipsy? You just posted that Hilter killed 6 million Jews/gypsies and Catholics to put an end to low morals in the media.

And you have another poster saying that Hitler did it right.

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

Dude, you are a Commie Tard, God Hating DemNazi. Everything you post is a lie because you are all Deranged and Insane because God cursed you for being a Hateful Retard.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

The Parallels are between Hitlery Von Cankles McPutin and Hitler.

Just like we compare you to Joseph Goebells.

Don't be sad little DemNazi. After Jesus comes for The Church and removes them from Earth and The 21 End Time Plagues Come, you and Bernie will actually be allowed to Behead People with your Guillotines. You'll accept The Mark of Anti-Christ, The Lefty Messiah, and then on Judgment Day after Armageddon, you will go to Hell, and burn there with Muhammad, Hitler, Stalin and Mao, and Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton too.

Ok, Comrade Boomer.

You want to be my friend?

 

[Correll]

The Characters were not sympathetic, the plot was full of holes, the setting was full of holes, the action was hard to see, not engaging, and not believable, even in the context of a comic book movie. War Rhinos?

I disagree with all of this as does most of the movie going world.

The question stands.



Black Panther was a shit movie, that pandered to blacks with a feel good message. It worked there.


Red Dawn did the same to whites.


Why did it work for Black Panther, but not Red Dawn?

The question is invalid because the movie was not shit.

You find it believable that even in the marvel-verse, that a 16 year old girl, is the Minister of Technology? Is smarter than Bruce freaking BANNER?

A shit movie.

Um, that's not all that abnormal for Marvel at all. Genius characters that can create and understand all sorts of crazy stuff are all over the place. Besides Shuri, you have characters like Amadeous Cho, Moon Girl, Valeria Richards...Marvel has long used the idea that some people are ridiculously intelligent as an easy way to pass off any kind of technology they want. They do it with children, too.

The movies have a lot of canon to try to deal with. Superscience has long been a superpower. Generally there is an explanation for it. None was given for Shuri. And even allowing for that, they were over the top with it.


Your example of Spiderman, was a good one. THe difference in the way they dealt with the interactions between an older and massively accomplished superhero, and a young but bright and relevant character, really showed the difference between doing it right and not.

What explanation was given for Tony Stark's superscience? How about Bruce Banner's? Hank Pym's? The only explanation is they are all geniuses and therefor any technology they want to give those characters is to be accepted. I'm not sure how that's different with Shuri.

Also, what specifically is over the top about Shuri, as opposed to the other such characters Marvel has used in the movies?

Correct. Tony Stark's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. You need an additional suspension of disbelief, that the answer to so many problems, ie build an army of Iron Men, is never done.


Bruce Banner's super science requires some suspension of disbelief, though his super science is not that super, and it is very believable that they don't want to do that to more people.


Hank Pym's super science requires suspension of disbelief. His accomplishments, seem less world saving than Starks, so the lack of an army of Ant Men, seems more believable.


Shuri's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. THat she is super science, at age 16 as opposed to the other Mad Scientists listed, who mastered their fields as adults, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her brother is a super hero, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her family maintained secrecy of hiding a secret the size of a nation, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. Vibranium, requires another suspension of disbelief. That a nation ruled by a warrior king with a warrior culture, and a massive tech advantage, never waged war, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. The cloaking field, requires another suspension of disbelief.


Seven is a lot more than one or two. That is what is over the top about Black Panther.

 

[Correll]

Plot holes.

Plot holes are purely subjective, they are nothing but an opinion of the individual.

I disagree.


Why did Wakada not grow a large crop of the Black Panther drug and create an army of super soldiers while the evil "colonizers" were "colonizing" Africa, and save them all?

Isn't that pretty much Killmonger's argument for what Wakanda should have been doing? They had been following a policy of secrecy, that was one of the major gripes Killmonger had.

Sort of. Would have been even more effective when the "colonizers" did not have tanks and helicopters to fight the enhanced super soldiers though.


So, hundreds of years of different kings? None of those super human Warrior Kings wanted to, you know, make War?

So, now your issues with the Black Panther have moved far beyond the movie and you are bashing the comics themselves.

That is most interesting.

Why didn’t Tony Stark give his design to the US military and let them make a whole army of Iron men?

The hundreds of years of different kings is implied in the movies. The policy of secrecy, must have been in place during the entire ages of exploration and imperalism.


As to Tony Stark, and the lack of an Army of Iron Men, yes that requires a second suspension of disbelief. As I have already discussed.

 

[Correll]

I've heard very few conservatives talk about it. None that have, had stated that.


SO, you are just talking shit. Like normal.

You go to more klan meetings than I do

YOu are really quite the asshole online. YOu must be very different in real life, huh?

Name-calling again.

You do agree that rw deserved it, do you not?

Ah.....that's your excuse for it, eh?

RW being a complete ******* asshole, is not an "excuse" for calling him an asshole. It is a good reason to call him an asshole.


ONly a ******* moron, would need that explained to him. Or a ******* liar.

 

[Correll]

I've heard very few conservatives talk about it. None that have, had stated that.


SO, you are just talking shit. Like normal.

You go to more klan meetings than I do

YOu are really quite the asshole online. YOu must be very different in real life, huh?

Your affiliation with elements of the klan is well known.

Your saying shit you can't back up, and being a coward, is well know.


I like that you did not even deny being very different in real life. I guess there are limits to how stupid you want to look.

And.....name-calling. Retreating again, I see.

All rw did, was call me a name. He is a ******* asshole and a troll. Like you are.

 

[Correll]

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.


You should really take your own advice.

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

Most men in rage would beat the shit out of most female cops. And yet they are lofted up into the highest equality platitudes. There are actually civilian guys who help female cops out when in trouble. The added costs to the police departments and less value for the dollar spent is just the start. So the entertainers make it look quite different. We see it everyday. Just one issue.

So your issue is that women should not be cops and they should not be portrayed as cops in movies. Women make very good cops in real life, and certainly very good detectives, which takes brain work.

You just don't want women to be shown on screen unless they are serving coffee or having sex with some guy. I get it.

the INCELs sure do take these movies personally.

That your only answer is to personally attack the poster, shows that A you can't challenge his point, and B. that you are an asshole.

Cry about personal attacks.....and then personally attacks.

Your request that I just let your fellow libtards insult me, and take it like a *****, is denied, you fucktard.

 

[Correll]

Most men in rage would beat the shit out of most female cops. And yet they are lofted up into the highest equality platitudes. There are actually civilian guys who help female cops out when in trouble. The added costs to the police departments and less value for the dollar spent is just the start. So the entertainers make it look quite different. We see it everyday. Just one issue.

So your issue is that women should not be cops and they should not be portrayed as cops in movies. Women make very good cops in real life, and certainly very good detectives, which takes brain work.

You just don't want women to be shown on screen unless they are serving coffee or having sex with some guy. I get it.

the INCELs sure do take these movies personally.

Living vicariously through fantasy role play is all they have.

Says the woman with 21 thousand posts.

I'm curious...what does a poster's number of posts have to do with anything? Is your concern a cultural/heritage thing?

She made a point to ridicule another poster for caring about movies. That is a strange insult coming from someone who spends so much time, on a online discussion forum. This is not real life either, yet she cares enough to spend large amounts of time here.


That was my point. Obviously.

 

[Correll]

Bullshit. It sucked. But it pandered to a ethnic group that likes to spend money and spent a lot of money seeing it over and over again.

it was a great movie, one of the better superhero movies ever. That you think it sucks is all on you, and not on the movie.

i guess there were too many black people for you in it.,

Wow. YOu made it about race. What a shocker. I am shocked. Shocked.


It sucked. The story was weak as shit. They failed to explain, pretty much everything about Wakanda. They tried to have a fusion of high tech and ancient african culture, which was brave, but they failed, they pandered shamelessly to racist black nationalism, insulting the intelligence of their target audience by doing it badly.

But they made a shit load of money, because they pandered to what their audience wanted to see.


How much money do you think they could have made, if they had did something similar but to a much larger group? Only not without being shit?

Black Panther is the 12th highest grossing movie of all time, so....probably not much more.

REally? You think that if instead of pandering to a small minority, that they had instead pandered to a target audience five times bigger, that they could not have earned even more?

AND, my point was not that they had to choose between them, but that they could do BOTH.


BALANCE.


Not just serve one side of the socio-political divide, but both.


They are leaving BILLIONS on the table. BILLIONS.

"Pandering to a small minority"....you have the same objections to "Fiddler on the Roof", "Exodus" and "Schindler's List"? After all, they pandered to a much smaller audience than "Black Panther".

I am not complaining about Black Panther pandering to blacks. Can you read?

 

[Montrovant]

I disagree with all of this as does most of the movie going world.

The question is invalid because the movie was not shit.

You find it believable that even in the marvel-verse, that a 16 year old girl, is the Minister of Technology? Is smarter than Bruce freaking BANNER?

A shit movie.

Um, that's not all that abnormal for Marvel at all. Genius characters that can create and understand all sorts of crazy stuff are all over the place. Besides Shuri, you have characters like Amadeous Cho, Moon Girl, Valeria Richards...Marvel has long used the idea that some people are ridiculously intelligent as an easy way to pass off any kind of technology they want. They do it with children, too.

The movies have a lot of canon to try to deal with. Superscience has long been a superpower. Generally there is an explanation for it. None was given for Shuri. And even allowing for that, they were over the top with it.


Your example of Spiderman, was a good one. THe difference in the way they dealt with the interactions between an older and massively accomplished superhero, and a young but bright and relevant character, really showed the difference between doing it right and not.

What explanation was given for Tony Stark's superscience? How about Bruce Banner's? Hank Pym's? The only explanation is they are all geniuses and therefor any technology they want to give those characters is to be accepted. I'm not sure how that's different with Shuri.

Also, what specifically is over the top about Shuri, as opposed to the other such characters Marvel has used in the movies?

Correct. Tony Stark's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. You need an additional suspension of disbelief, that the answer to so many problems, ie build an army of Iron Men, is never done.


Bruce Banner's super science requires some suspension of disbelief, though his super science is not that super, and it is very believable that they don't want to do that to more people.


Hank Pym's super science requires suspension of disbelief. His accomplishments, seem less world saving than Starks, so the lack of an army of Ant Men, seems more believable.


Shuri's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. THat she is super science, at age 16 as opposed to the other Mad Scientists listed, who mastered their fields as adults, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her brother is a super hero, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her family maintained secrecy of hiding a secret the size of a nation, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. Vibranium, requires another suspension of disbelief. That a nation ruled by a warrior king with a warrior culture, and a massive tech advantage, never waged war, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. The cloaking field, requires another suspension of disbelief.


Seven is a lot more than one or two. That is what is over the top about Black Panther.

You list those things about Shuri in Black Panther as if each of the other characters didn't have tons of different things requiring suspension of disbelief in their various movies. That's very disingenuous.

 

[Correll]

You find it believable that even in the marvel-verse, that a 16 year old girl, is the Minister of Technology? Is smarter than Bruce freaking BANNER?

A shit movie.

Um, that's not all that abnormal for Marvel at all. Genius characters that can create and understand all sorts of crazy stuff are all over the place. Besides Shuri, you have characters like Amadeous Cho, Moon Girl, Valeria Richards...Marvel has long used the idea that some people are ridiculously intelligent as an easy way to pass off any kind of technology they want. They do it with children, too.

The movies have a lot of canon to try to deal with. Superscience has long been a superpower. Generally there is an explanation for it. None was given for Shuri. And even allowing for that, they were over the top with it.


Your example of Spiderman, was a good one. THe difference in the way they dealt with the interactions between an older and massively accomplished superhero, and a young but bright and relevant character, really showed the difference between doing it right and not.

What explanation was given for Tony Stark's superscience? How about Bruce Banner's? Hank Pym's? The only explanation is they are all geniuses and therefor any technology they want to give those characters is to be accepted. I'm not sure how that's different with Shuri.

Also, what specifically is over the top about Shuri, as opposed to the other such characters Marvel has used in the movies?

Correct. Tony Stark's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. You need an additional suspension of disbelief, that the answer to so many problems, ie build an army of Iron Men, is never done.


Bruce Banner's super science requires some suspension of disbelief, though his super science is not that super, and it is very believable that they don't want to do that to more people.


Hank Pym's super science requires suspension of disbelief. His accomplishments, seem less world saving than Starks, so the lack of an army of Ant Men, seems more believable.


Shuri's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. THat she is super science, at age 16 as opposed to the other Mad Scientists listed, who mastered their fields as adults, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her brother is a super hero, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her family maintained secrecy of hiding a secret the size of a nation, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. Vibranium, requires another suspension of disbelief. That a nation ruled by a warrior king with a warrior culture, and a massive tech advantage, never waged war, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. The cloaking field, requires another suspension of disbelief.


Seven is a lot more than one or two. That is what is over the top about Black Panther.

You list those things about Shuri in Black Panther as if each of the other characters didn't have tons of different things requiring suspension of disbelief in their various movies. That's very disingenuous.

No, I really don't know of Iron Man or the Incredible Hulk, or Ant Man, requiring so many suspensions of disbelief.


If you can list them, the way I did for Black Panther, I will consider your list.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The hundreds of years of different kings is implied in the movies. The policy of secrecy, must have been in place during the entire ages of exploration and imperalism.

And it had nothing to do with the movie, yet you bash the movie based on something that the movie had nothing to do with...all because it is filled with black people.

 

[Correll]

The hundreds of years of different kings is implied in the movies. The policy of secrecy, must have been in place during the entire ages of exploration and imperalism.

And it had nothing to do with the movie, yet you bash the movie based on something that the movie had nothing to do with...all because it is filled with black people.

Dude. Don't be a ******* asshole.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I disagree with all of this as does most of the movie going world.

The question is invalid because the movie was not shit.

You find it believable that even in the marvel-verse, that a 16 year old girl, is the Minister of Technology? Is smarter than Bruce freaking BANNER?

A shit movie.

Um, that's not all that abnormal for Marvel at all. Genius characters that can create and understand all sorts of crazy stuff are all over the place. Besides Shuri, you have characters like Amadeous Cho, Moon Girl, Valeria Richards...Marvel has long used the idea that some people are ridiculously intelligent as an easy way to pass off any kind of technology they want. They do it with children, too.

The movies have a lot of canon to try to deal with. Superscience has long been a superpower. Generally there is an explanation for it. None was given for Shuri. And even allowing for that, they were over the top with it.


Your example of Spiderman, was a good one. THe difference in the way they dealt with the interactions between an older and massively accomplished superhero, and a young but bright and relevant character, really showed the difference between doing it right and not.

What explanation was given for Tony Stark's superscience? How about Bruce Banner's? Hank Pym's? The only explanation is they are all geniuses and therefor any technology they want to give those characters is to be accepted. I'm not sure how that's different with Shuri.

Also, what specifically is over the top about Shuri, as opposed to the other such characters Marvel has used in the movies?

Correct. Tony Stark's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. You need an additional suspension of disbelief, that the answer to so many problems, ie build an army of Iron Men, is never done.


Bruce Banner's super science requires some suspension of disbelief, though his super science is not that super, and it is very believable that they don't want to do that to more people.


Hank Pym's super science requires suspension of disbelief. His accomplishments, seem less world saving than Starks, so the lack of an army of Ant Men, seems more believable.


Shuri's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. THat she is super science, at age 16 as opposed to the other Mad Scientists listed, who mastered their fields as adults, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her brother is a super hero, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her family maintained secrecy of hiding a secret the size of a nation, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. Vibranium, requires another suspension of disbelief. That a nation ruled by a warrior king with a warrior culture, and a massive tech advantage, never waged war, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. The cloaking field, requires another suspension of disbelief.


Seven is a lot more than one or two. That is what is over the top about Black Panther.

They are not seven suspensions of disbelief, they are all tied together into the same thing. You judge Black Panther different than every other superhero movie..why is that?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The hundreds of years of different kings is implied in the movies. The policy of secrecy, must have been in place during the entire ages of exploration and imperalism.

And it had nothing to do with the movie, yet you bash the movie based on something that the movie had nothing to do with...all because it is filled with black people.

Dude. Don't be a ******* asshole.

I am not the one being an asshole, you are bashing a movie for not covering 50 years worth of comic books in one 2 hour movie.

 

[Correll]

You find it believable that even in the marvel-verse, that a 16 year old girl, is the Minister of Technology? Is smarter than Bruce freaking BANNER?

A shit movie.

Um, that's not all that abnormal for Marvel at all. Genius characters that can create and understand all sorts of crazy stuff are all over the place. Besides Shuri, you have characters like Amadeous Cho, Moon Girl, Valeria Richards...Marvel has long used the idea that some people are ridiculously intelligent as an easy way to pass off any kind of technology they want. They do it with children, too.

The movies have a lot of canon to try to deal with. Superscience has long been a superpower. Generally there is an explanation for it. None was given for Shuri. And even allowing for that, they were over the top with it.


Your example of Spiderman, was a good one. THe difference in the way they dealt with the interactions between an older and massively accomplished superhero, and a young but bright and relevant character, really showed the difference between doing it right and not.

What explanation was given for Tony Stark's superscience? How about Bruce Banner's? Hank Pym's? The only explanation is they are all geniuses and therefor any technology they want to give those characters is to be accepted. I'm not sure how that's different with Shuri.

Also, what specifically is over the top about Shuri, as opposed to the other such characters Marvel has used in the movies?

Correct. Tony Stark's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. You need an additional suspension of disbelief, that the answer to so many problems, ie build an army of Iron Men, is never done.


Bruce Banner's super science requires some suspension of disbelief, though his super science is not that super, and it is very believable that they don't want to do that to more people.


Hank Pym's super science requires suspension of disbelief. His accomplishments, seem less world saving than Starks, so the lack of an army of Ant Men, seems more believable.


Shuri's super science requires a suspension of disbelief. THat she is super science, at age 16 as opposed to the other Mad Scientists listed, who mastered their fields as adults, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her brother is a super hero, requires another suspension of disbelief. That her family maintained secrecy of hiding a secret the size of a nation, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. Vibranium, requires another suspension of disbelief. That a nation ruled by a warrior king with a warrior culture, and a massive tech advantage, never waged war, for centuries, requires another suspension of disbelief. The cloaking field, requires another suspension of disbelief.


Seven is a lot more than one or two. That is what is over the top about Black Panther.

They are not seven suspensions of disbelief, they are all tied together into the same thing. You judge Black Panther different than every other superhero movie..why is that?

1. How are they tied together?

2. You are incorrect.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

1. How are they tied together?

2. You are incorrect.

1. They are all part of the same story, they all are interconnected.

2. Yes, I am 100% correct. And I suspect I am correct about the reason why.

 

[Correll]

The hundreds of years of different kings is implied in the movies. The policy of secrecy, must have been in place during the entire ages of exploration and imperalism.

And it had nothing to do with the movie, yet you bash the movie based on something that the movie had nothing to do with...all because it is filled with black people.

Dude. Don't be a ******* asshole.

I am not the one being an asshole, you are bashing a movie for not covering 50 years worth of comic books in one 2 hour movie.

Your race baiting, is you being an asshole.


I can have a conversation with someone being an asshole. I do it here all the time. But I will be pointing out that you are being as asshole, and I will be treating you accordingly.


Do you want to be treated, as though you are an asshole? DO you feel you deserve that?


Or, you could, you know, just drop the race baiting.

 

[Correll]

1. How are they tied together?

2. You are incorrect.

1. They are all part of the same story, they all are interconnected.

2. Yes, I am 100% correct. And I suspect I am correct about the reason why.

1. Same story? That is not an answer. They are seven different elements. THOR, now THOR had a collection of fantastical elements that were all tied together, ie Asgard is a far more advanced alien race. Wakanda? Not so much.


2. NO, you are not correct. and you are being an ass about it.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The hundreds of years of different kings is implied in the movies. The policy of secrecy, must have been in place during the entire ages of exploration and imperalism.

And it had nothing to do with the movie, yet you bash the movie based on something that the movie had nothing to do with...all because it is filled with black people.

Dude. Don't be a ******* asshole.

I am not the one being an asshole, you are bashing a movie for not covering 50 years worth of comic books in one 2 hour movie.

Your race baiting, is you being an asshole.


I can have a conversation with someone being an asshole. I do it here all the time. But I will be pointing out that you are being as asshole, and I will be treating you accordingly.


Do you want to be treated, as though you are an asshole? DO you feel you deserve that?


Or, you could, you know, just drop the race baiting.

I do not give a flying **** how you treat me, quit being suck a ******* snowflake for the love of god.

And while you are at it, quit bashing a movie for not covering 50 years worth of comic books in one 2 hour movie