Last time I checked, the law mandates a misdemeanor if itās found that she didnāt secure the gun.
The second amendment states that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
When did you disprove the fact children only have the rights of a prisoner? When did it become allowable for children to come and go freely without supervision? When did you prove parents aren't held accountable for the actions of their children?
So prisoners have a second amendment right?
when have you ever talked about human rights?? youve only talked about priviledges that are not rights,,
theyve gotten due process rights that caused them to loose that right,,
And what did I say? What ever the law mandates. A pieces of shit fascist believe they are the soul authority on what is law. They want to make it up as the crime happens. If it's not in the law I don't give a shit about it.
What exactly does shall not be infringed mean to you?
So if we changed the law to penalize these people with felonies instead of misdemeanors, would you be ok with that?
Prisoners have human rights children have human rights neither have anymore rights than the other.
So prisoners have the rights to a gun thanks for pointing that out.
Red herring basis on speculation
no prisoners' dont have all their human rights while they are in custody,,
Iām asking you. Isnāt that what the 2nd amendment states?
Itās called a simple question. Iām asking you if you would be ok with this change to that law.
Prisoners have human rights
No you aren't asking anything you're making a claim based on a red herring fallacy
youre the only one saying someone doesnt have rights,,
It's your speculation rephrase your question
