- Moderator
- #21
I thought it was well-written and I agreed with all of it up until the last paragraph. The references to Mrs Pelosi's mental health could have been left off IMHO; it approaches personal animus and demagoguery that isn't needed. What Mrs Pelosi did was wrong and disrespectful to the office of the presidency IMHO and she should be called out for that, but using mental health as a negative without a clinical diagnosis isn't good. One may think her actions were reprehensible but that does not mean she is mentally ill.
We see the same thing around the USMB quite often, allegations of mental illness or retardation are a poor way to win an argument. All it really does is make somebody else defensive and incivility ensues. Nobody needs that.
IMO, if it was "well written"....wouldn't it be a bit less one sided?