Since Everyone Else Complains, Here is Mine

[candycorn]

Can we get a rule in Zone 1 that addresses the practice of false citations?

Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

Perfectly fine headline....However it does cite CNN as saying something. The link in the OP however isn’t from CNN, it’s from a video on Real Clear Politics. The title shouldn’t invoke CNN if CNN isn’t linked.

Here is another one:

The link is to Rumble.com...

Here is a citation of the New York Times:

Every link in the OP is to the national pulse.

Clearly the news organizations cited are not saying what the USMB posters are hoping they’d say....otherwise, they would quote them directly.

It isn’t that hard....

Here is proof that it can be done: Title cites the New York Times....the link is to the New York Times.

I hope the moderators will consider implementing this new rule to make the heavily trafficked forums more honest.

 

[progressive hunter]

Can we get a rule in Zone 1 that addresses the practice of false citations?

Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

View attachment 998012
Perfectly fine headline....However it does cite CNN as saying something. The link in the OP however isn’t from CNN, it’s from a video on Real Clear Politics. The title shouldn’t invoke CNN if CNN isn’t linked.

Here is another one:

View attachment 998013

The link is to Rumble.com...

Here is a citation of the New York Times:
View attachment 998015
Every link in the OP is to the national pulse.

Clearly the news organizations cited are not saying what the USMB posters are hoping they’d say....otherwise, they would quote them directly.

It isn’t that hard....

Here is proof that it can be done: Title cites the New York Times....the link is to the New York Times.

View attachment 998014


I hope the moderators will consider implementing this new rule to make the heavily trafficked forums more honest.

so what youre saying is the left doesnt like its own tactics used against them,,

lifes tough,, buy a helmet and move on,,

 

[deannalw]

If everyone else jumped off a cliff, would you also jump off a cliff?

Whining and tattling is bad, sad and all fucked up.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Can we get a rule in Zone 1 that addresses the practice of false citations?

Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

View attachment 998012
Perfectly fine headline....However it does cite CNN as saying something. The link in the OP however isn’t from CNN, it’s from a video on Real Clear Politics. The title shouldn’t invoke CNN if CNN isn’t linked.

Here is another one:

View attachment 998013

The link is to Rumble.com...

Here is a citation of the New York Times:
View attachment 998015
Every link in the OP is to the national pulse.

Clearly the news organizations cited are not saying what the USMB posters are hoping they’d say....otherwise, they would quote them directly.

It isn’t that hard....

Here is proof that it can be done: Title cites the New York Times....the link is to the New York Times.

View attachment 998014


I hope the moderators will consider implementing this new rule to make the heavily trafficked forums more honest.

Don't do a Democrat and change the rules to suit your narrative, if anything is against the rules here, just report it, or keep clear of such threads.

 

[theHawk]

Can we get a rule in Zone 1 that addresses the practice of false citations?

Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

View attachment 998012
Perfectly fine headline....However it does cite CNN as saying something. The link in the OP however isn’t from CNN, it’s from a video on Real Clear Politics. The title shouldn’t invoke CNN if CNN isn’t linked.

Here is another one:

View attachment 998013

The link is to Rumble.com...

Here is a citation of the New York Times:
View attachment 998015
Every link in the OP is to the national pulse.

Clearly the news organizations cited are not saying what the USMB posters are hoping they’d say....otherwise, they would quote them directly.

It isn’t that hard....

Here is proof that it can be done: Title cites the New York Times....the link is to the New York Times.

View attachment 998014


I hope the moderators will consider implementing this new rule to make the heavily trafficked forums more honest.

Their links directly refer to the CNN stories.

Like a commentator looking at the CNN story.

Nice try, dolt.

 

[Woodznutz]

It isn't that blacks are dumb, it's just that they can't break the habit of voting for Democrats. Voting for Democrats has shown little rewards for them. Trump said "What have you got to lose?" by voting for him. The same opportunity presents again. Will the black community gamble that they will benefit for voting for Republicans? In fact, they do have nothing lose and should go for it.

Woodznutz- Political Advisor to the Black Community.

 

[justoffal]

Can we get a rule in Zone 1 that addresses the practice of false citations?

Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

View attachment 998012
Perfectly fine headline....However it does cite CNN as saying something. The link in the OP however isn’t from CNN, it’s from a video on Real Clear Politics. The title shouldn’t invoke CNN if CNN isn’t linked.

Here is another one:

View attachment 998013

The link is to Rumble.com...

Here is a citation of the New York Times:
View attachment 998015
Every link in the OP is to the national pulse.

Clearly the news organizations cited are not saying what the USMB posters are hoping they’d say....otherwise, they would quote them directly.

It isn’t that hard....

Here is proof that it can be done: Title cites the New York Times....the link is to the New York Times.

View attachment 998014


I hope the moderators will consider implementing this new rule to make the heavily trafficked forums more honest.

Ny times?..... Prolly a paywall involved.

 

[TNHarley]

The first thread is from CNN that was reported by another outlet. Dumb ass

 

[candycorn]

Their links directly refer to the CNN stories.

Like a commentator looking at the CNN story.

Nice try, dolt.

Gee, then why didn’t the authors directly quote CNN?

What those posters are doing is citing someone who is possibly mis-characterizing what CNN may or may not have said.

So the titles and the original post should not be allowed to say they are quoting CNN if they are not...quoting CNN.

 

[candycorn]

so what youre saying is the left doesnt like its own tactics used against them,,

lifes tough,, buy a helmet and move on,,

This is an example that proves the OP...

I didn’t say that at all. I showed examples of posters mis-characterizing what they are supposedly citing and you gave me another one. Thanks dope.

 

[progressive hunter]

This is an example that proves the OP...

I didn’t say that at all. I showed examples of posters mis-characterizing what they are supposedly citing and you gave me another one. Thanks dope.

opinions vary,,

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Gee, then why didn’t the authors directly quote CNN?

What those posters are doing is citing someone who is possibly mis-characterizing what CNN may or may not have said.

So the titles and the original post should not be allowed to say they are quoting CNN if they are not...quoting CNN.

CNN isn't a credible news source. They are "Fake News"

 

[candycorn]

CNN isn't a credible news source. They are "Fake News"

You know that is not the case. You also know that is not my point.

If I wanted to cite a true garbage source, I could quote the Gateway Pundit. But I would do so by quoting the Gateway Pundit.

If you are stating that CNN is saying ________. Quote CNN, not someone’s interpretation of CNN.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Can we get a rule in Zone 1 that addresses the practice of false citations?

Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

View attachment 998012
Perfectly fine headline....However it does cite CNN as saying something. The link in the OP however isn’t from CNN, it’s from a video on Real Clear Politics. The title shouldn’t invoke CNN if CNN isn’t linked.

Here is another one:

View attachment 998013

The link is to Rumble.com...

Here is a citation of the New York Times:
View attachment 998015
Every link in the OP is to the national pulse.

Clearly the news organizations cited are not saying what the USMB posters are hoping they’d say....otherwise, they would quote them directly.

It isn’t that hard....

Here is proof that it can be done: Title cites the New York Times....the link is to the New York Times.

View attachment 998014


I hope the moderators will consider implementing this new rule to make the heavily trafficked forums more honest.

MODERATORS: Can we get a rule that Leftards who don’t know what hyperlinks are banned from posting their lies on USMB?

 

[Delldude]

MODERATORS: Can we get a rule that Leftards who don’t know what hyperlinks are banned from posting their lies on USMB?

The left jumps all over Gateway Pundit and totally ignore the embedded hyperlinks revealing the source for the stories.

 

[fncceo]

Since Everyone Else Complains​

I don’t.

 

[BackAgain]

Can we get a rule in Zone 1 that addresses the practice of false citations?

Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

View attachment 998012
Perfectly fine headline....However it does cite CNN as saying something. The link in the OP however isn’t from CNN, it’s from a video on Real Clear Politics. The title shouldn’t invoke CNN if CNN isn’t linked.

Here is another one:

View attachment 998013

The link is to Rumble.com...

Here is a citation of the New York Times:
View attachment 998015
Every link in the OP is to the national pulse.

Clearly the news organizations cited are not saying what the USMB posters are hoping they’d say....otherwise, they would quote them directly.

It isn’t that hard....

Here is proof that it can be done: Title cites the New York Times....the link is to the New York Times.

View attachment 998014


I hope the moderators will consider implementing this new rule to make the heavily trafficked forums more honest.

Better yet: terminate the imbecile “Zone” shit altogether.

 

[Moonglow]

so what youre saying is the left doesnt like its own tactics used against them,,

lifes tough,, buy a helmet and move on,,

No, it's zone one rules.

 

[Moonglow]

Better yet: terminate the imbecile “Zone” shit altogether.

Buy the website and do as you please until then follow TOS.

 

[Plagerist]

Their links directly refer to the CNN stories.

Like a commentator looking at the CNN story.

Nice try, dolt.

That's what I figured. Thx.