Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Unlike YOU I've got patents to my name.
Wow!
I can hardly believe my good fortune.
And yet, you're still clueless when it comes to economics.
It happens.
Don't beat yourself up about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlike YOU I've got patents to my name.
You obviously don't understand that all EVs have a greater carbon cost of production and that it matters when the car pays that back and becomes cleaner than an ICE vehicle.
A small EV will pay back the carbon cost in about 15K miles so that makes sense
A full size electric SUV will pay back it's carbon cost of production on something like 100K miles so that doesn't make too much sense from an environmental standpoint.
These are just the facts but you people seem to think it's an insult.
I gave you enough information.
How much of that unlimited solar are you getting at midnight?
Relax Francis, I'm mocking CC's ignorance of economics.
Wow!
I can hardly believe my good fortune.
And yet, you're still clueless when it comes to economics.
It happens.
Don't beat yourself up about it.
You made the claim YOU prove it.
Are you really stupid? Or are you just playing it for a role?
LOL.
Hmm, maybe YOU have some questions about how patents and intellectual property work in industry. Let me help you! I might use a lot of big words, so don't feel sad if you have to consult a dictionary from time to time.
We were discussing the decline in US CO2 emissions and the role the free market played, not your imaginary patents.
You mean your imaginary version of the free market you don’t understand?
Do you REALLY need someone to explain a simple graph to you????????
Do you REALLY need someone to explain a simple graph to you????????
Seems quite practical for you. However many don't have the funds to install solar or it is impractical where they live. Some folks want to be able to travel more than 300 miles as well. If EV's are that much more efficient and practical, an unregulated Market would support them. Government mandates, such as Newsom's decree that all cars must be EV by 2035 is tyrannical and wrong headed.Are they now? I've been driving my EV for free for about the last 3 years. Gets 300 miles on a full charge. I charge on my solar so I don't even pay to charge the thing.
I'm curious what is impractical about this scenario? Is it impractical in your imagination because you don't know what you are talking about? Why not listen to those of us who are LIVING IT right now?
Seems quite practical for you. However many don't have the funds to install solar or it is impractical where they live.
Some folks want to be able to travel more than 300 miles as well. If EV's are that much more efficient and practical, an unregulated Market would support them.
Government mandates, such as Newsom's decree that all cars must be EV by 2035 is tyrannical and wrong headed.
Yes, in fact in CA so called 'conservationists' have already torn down some dams.
You don't have an explanation?
I'm shocked.
You don't have an explanation?
I'm shocked.
Sure, tear down the dams and let SF, the central valley and LA go back to desert.Most rivers coming out of the Sierras in Cali are dammed. It isn't necessarily good for the ecosystems and since you guys are such MANLY MEN I'm sure you don't need the "ecosystem" but for most people they do. Ecosystems are very complex and evade the thinking of simpletons like you.
Sure, tear down the dams and let SF, the central valley and LA go back to desert.