Sidney Reid, the DC woman just found not guilty of assaulting an FBI agent, issues a withering and gutsy statement.

[Rawley]

Hopefully she now sues and gets set for life.

Good luck with that

 

[MarcATL]

Hopefully she now sues and gets set for life.

From your lips to God's ears.

 

[OKTexas]

Trump just did the same thing to Santos.

Now you're just lying, commuting a sentence does not change a guilty verdict. The scum in this case refused to render one, that's jury nullification.

.

 

[pknopp]

Now you're just lying, commuting a sentence does not change a guilty verdict. The scum in this case refused to render one, that's jury nullification.

.

it overturns the sentence.

 

[OKTexas]

it overturns the sentence.

What does that have to do with this case? Keep it on topic.

.

 

[Crepitus]

Since when did Republicans and rightwing Americans come to love the feds?

Since they took them over and turned them into their own private gestapo.

 

[Crepitus]

I make it a point not to listen to anybody with a big tattoo on their forehead.

WTF?

 

[pknopp]

What does that have to do with this case? Keep it on topic.

.

Another example of MAGA being upset at something Trump does himself.

 

[Maxdeath]

Since when did Republicans and rightwing Americans come to love the feds?

Have no idea. As an independent I have always respected the police and federal officers. As hard as it is to believe i even respect the military, having served.
But I remember the call of the crazy democrats of “defund the police”.

 

[OKTexas]

Another example of MAGA being upset at something Trump does himself.

Really, when did Trump attack a federal agent?

.

 

[pknopp]

Really, when did Trump attack a federal agent?

.

He got his minions to do that.

 

[Marener]

Really, have you read the particulars of the case, I have.

.

I read the trial went badly and the government was withholding evidence.

 

[OKTexas]

He got his minions to do that.

Another example of MAGA being upset at something Trump does himself.

There are 2 options here, you lied, or your English is so bad you don't know what "himself" means.

.

 

[OKTexas]

I read the trial went badly and the government was withholding evidence.

What was there to withhold? The facts were pretty straightforward.

.

 

[Marener]

What was there to withhold? The facts were pretty straightforward.

.

They temporarily withheld texts from the cops that demonstrated prejudice against the defendant as well as surveillance camera footage. One text never was turned over. Probably for good reason.

Do you know why they even arrested her?

 

[OKTexas]

They temporarily withheld texts from the cops that demonstrated prejudice against the defendant as well as surveillance camera footage. One text never was turned over. Probably for good reason.

Do you know why they even arrested her?

Me thinks if you were an officer, you'd be prejudice against a person, who's sole purpose of being there, is to make your job harder to do. Also, define "temporarily withheld".

.

 

[Marener]

Me thinks if you were an officer, you'd be prejudice against a person, who's sole purpose of being there, is to make your job harder to do. Also, define "temporarily withheld".

.

The footage was only turned over the day before the trial, after the prosecutors lied about the camera not working.

Do you even know why they arrested her?

 

[OKTexas]

The footage was only turned over the day before the trial, after the prosecutors lied about the camera not working.

Do you even know why they arrested her?

Yeah, she interfered with officers in the performance of their duties, then got combative when moved aside.

.

 

[Marener]

Yeah, she interfered with officers in the performance of their duties, then got combative when moved aside.

.

She wasn’t interfering. She was filming, which is a constitutionally protected activity. Notice how she wasn’t charged with interfering?

Her arrest was baseless.

Then what came next, assault? They just grabbed her and she slightly flexed her leg. She didn’t even hit anyone. It’s a reflex when the cops became immediately combative and grabbed her for no reason.

The jury acted perfectly reasonably. There was no case. The prosecution is disgraceful.

What did I miss?

 

[OKTexas]

She wasn’t interfering. She was filming, which is a constitutionally protected activity. Notice how she wasn’t charged with interfering?

Her arrest was baseless.

Then what came next, assault? They just grabbed her and she slightly flexed her leg. She didn’t even hit anyone. It’s a reflex when the cops became immediately combative and grabbed her for no reason.

The jury acted perfectly reasonably. There was no case. The prosecution is disgraceful.

What did I miss?

If she was standing back filming, how did she get between an ICE officer and a detainee?

.