Sidney Reid, the DC woman just found not guilty of assaulting an FBI agent, issues a withering and gutsy statement.

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
105,577
Reaction score
156,413
Points
3,615
She's correct, the problem here is trump. He is encouraging ICE to break the law and "make examples" of people who they dislike even though they have committed no crimes.

1760735400146.webp
 
I make it a point not to listen to anybody with a big tattoo on their forehead.
 
She's correct, the problem here is trump. He is encouraging ICE to break the law and "make examples" of people who they dislike even though they have committed no crimes.

View attachment 1174420


Just proves how biased the scum living in DC are, nothing more. They'll never seat an unbiased jury there.

.
 
1760737312412.webp


There's an idea... Kash should make up teams of FBI agents who he's fairly sure of about their enlightened progressive liberal leanings and ensure they get sent in full gear with big FBI identification markings to walk Portland and LA's streets.

It would be too bad if a enlightened progressive liberal FBI agent got clobbered with a brick from an ANTIFA protestor.

SMILE



:)
 
Last edited:
In a lot of blue cities they will allow someone to knife a person and send them back out on the street before the person is even out of the emergency room.
Because they hate the police. I can only imagine what their hate level is of federal officers.
 
In a lot of blue cities they will allow someone to knife a person and send them back out on the street before the person is even out of the emergency room.
Because they hate the police. I can only imagine what their hate level is of federal officers.
Since when did Republicans and rightwing Americans come to love the feds?
 
She's correct, the problem here is trump. He is encouraging ICE to break the law and "make examples" of people who they dislike even though they have committed no crimes.

View attachment 1174420
Oh gramps, we're just getting started. By 2028 we're going to have you and your cult drooling and quivering in the dark in your bedroom closet.
 
DC crumb buns will never find guilty their like kind
 
Just shoes what a weak ass federal prosecutor Pirro. Her evidence was weak.


She didn't personally try the case. The ***** was told to move away from the officers, she didn't. In fact she moved between the officers and the criminals they were transferring. Which is interfering with the officers, then she fought with the officer after he moved her aside. That's assault and obstruction of justice. I guess it's open season of federal officers in DC now. They should have just pepper sprayed the *****.

.
 
Hopefully she now sues and gets set for life.
 
She didn't personally try the case. The ***** was told to move away from the officers, she didn't. In fact she moved between the officers and the criminals they were transferring. Which is interfering with the officers, then she fought with the officer after he moved her aside. That's assault and obstruction of justice. I guess it's open season of federal officers in DC now. They should have just pepper sprayed the *****.

.

Weak ass deflection. She is responsible the failure to secure a conviction. She took three times to secure a indictment and when presented to the jury, the case fell apart. Pirro is in charge of the office, she is responsible for this failure. In the Army they taught us that person in command is responsible the actions and conduct of those under their command. She is a ******* failure.
 
Weak ass deflection. She is responsible the failure to secure a conviction. She took three times to secure a indictment and when presented to the jury, the case fell apart. Pirro is in charge of the office, she is responsible for this failure. In the Army they taught us that person in command is responsible the actions and conduct of those under their command. She is a ******* failure.


It was jury nullification, plain and simple. And not the first time in DC.

.
 
15th post
Just proves how biased the scum living in DC are, nothing more. They'll never seat an unbiased jury there.
How does it prove that? I bet you know little to nothing about the case.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom