Should women be allowed to vote ?

[Tommy Tainant]

Pete Hegseth reposts video that says women shouldn’t be allowed to vote

Progressive evangelical group says ideas shared by pastors and amplified by defense secretary are ‘very disturbing’

www.theguardian.com

Its only a feminist like "Pete" Hegeth who has the balls to broach this subject. In some lib circles this can be considered controversial.

Most women are happiest in their kitchens giving their man a blow job on request.
Voting is some way above their pay grade and Pete is right to believe that this experiment should stop.

 

[Meister]

Pete Hegseth reposts video that says women shouldn’t be allowed to vote

Progressive evangelical group says ideas shared by pastors and amplified by defense secretary are ‘very disturbing’

www.theguardian.com

Its only a feminist like "Pete" Hegeth who has the balls to broach this subject. In some lib circles this can be considered controversial.

Most women are happiest in their kitchens giving their man a blow job on request.
Voting is some way above their pay grade and Pete is right to believe that this experiment should stop.

In your case? No, you shouldn't vote. And I certainly don't want to know about what
you do to your man in the kitchen.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Pete Hegseth reposts video that says women shouldn’t be allowed to vote

Progressive evangelical group says ideas shared by pastors and amplified by defense secretary are ‘very disturbing’

www.theguardian.com

Its only a feminist like "Pete" Hegeth who has the balls to broach this subject. In some lib circles this can be considered controversial.

Most women are happiest in their kitchens giving their man a blow job on request.
Voting is some way above their pay grade and Pete is right to believe that this experiment should stop.

Of course they should be allowed to vote as long as they are adults.

You are lowering your voting age to 16. That's creepy and perhaps a reflection of the state trying to legalize creepy behaviour over time. Age and experience should determine who can vote.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

In your case? No, you shouldn't vote. And I certainly don't want to know about what
you do to your man in the kitchen.

It's The Guardian, right there with the Daily Kook and Huffing Paint

 

[Tommy Tainant]

It's The Guardian, right there with the Daily Kook and Huffing Paint

What bit did they get wrong ?

 

[Woodznutz]

Keep 'em pregnant and barefoot I say.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What bit did they get wrong ?

IDK I don't read left loon sites, I see what it did to you

 

[Dragonlady]

Keep 'em pregnant and barefoot I say.

I love it when some incel claims to be an "Alpha Male". No true Alpha Male ever has to declare himself as such because people KNOW, the moment he opens his mouth.

 

[percysunshine]

Women who do not know what a woman is should not be allowed to vote.

 

[MisterBeale]

Why not just post the tweet and discuss the tweet, rather than Guardian propaganda?

 

[Donald H]

Pete Hegseth reposts video that says women shouldn’t be allowed to vote

Progressive evangelical group says ideas shared by pastors and amplified by defense secretary are ‘very disturbing’

www.theguardian.com

Its only a feminist like "Pete" Hegeth who has the balls to broach this subject. In some lib circles this can be considered controversial.

Most women are happiest in their kitchens giving their man a blow job on request.
Voting is some way above their pay grade and Pete is right to believe that this experiment should stop.

Good one Tommy!

 

[MisterBeale]

Voting is some way above their pay grade and Pete is right to believe that this experiment should stop.

After watching the video, it is clear this is a mischaracterization.

Their belief is that every household should have only one vote.

. . so doesn't that mean divorced and single women would still get to vote?

On top of that, the CNN segment highlighted that Doug Wilson thinks slavery is fine if done morally.


I am doubtful that Hegseth feels the same. Just because someone reposts something on X does not necessarily mean it is an endorsement of all that content.


Wilson even explicitly states at the end of the interview that he is not a racist or sexist. . . well?

He thinks America should adopt a Christian theocracy. And he's finding a new audience under Trump​

Aug 8, 2025

 

[citygator]

Totally nuts. This guys is our Defense leader? “Hi I am Pete Hegseth, I think those women serving their country in uniform should get married so they can submit to their husbands who will cast the family vote for them.”

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Its only a feminist like "Pete" Hegeth who has the balls to broach this subject. In some lib circles this can be considered controversial.

Most women are happiest in their kitchens giving their man a blow job on request.
Voting is some way above their pay grade and Pete is right to believe that this experiment should stop.

lol...two men with opposite yet identical problems, the media...pete talks to the media when common sense dictates otherwise and tommy parrots it for the same reason.

 

[Donald H]

On top of that, the CNN segment highlighted that Doug Wilson thinks slavery is fine if done morally.

He knows that it's sinful to disagree with his bibles on slavery being o.k.

 

[22lcidw]

Economics, desperation and poverty will decide where we head.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

After watching the video, it is clear this is a mischaracterization.

Their belief is that every household should have only one vote.

. . so doesn't that mean divorced and single women would still get to vote?

On top of that, the CNN segment highlighted that Doug Wilson thinks slavery is fine if done morally.


I am doubtful that Hegseth feels the same. Just because someone reposts something on X does not necessarily mean it is an endorsement of all that content.


Wilson even explicitly states at the end of the interview that he is not a racist or sexist. . . well?

He thinks America should adopt a Christian theocracy. And he's finding a new audience under Trump​

Aug 8, 2025

Moral slavery coming soon.

 

[Midnight FM]

It's a moot point, because women's right to vote has no snowball's chance in hell of going anywhere. It's protected under the US Constitution, and I see no chance that the states would agree to change the Constitution in such a way.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

It's a moot point, because women's right to vote has no snowball's chance in hell of going anywhere. It's protected under the US Constitution, and I see no chance that the states would agree to change the Constitution in such a way.

You dont have a constitution any more.

 

[Midnight FM]

You dont have a constitution any more.

https://www.davemanuel.com/2022/01/03/how-hard-to-repeal-amendment

An Amendment legally becomes part of the Constitution, so there is quite a process involved, as changes to the Constitution aren't taken lightly.

To start the process of passing a new amendment, the proposed amendment must be passed by a 2/3rds majority in BOTH the House and Senate.

After that, the proposed Amendment still isn't part of the Constitution, as the Amendment must be sent to all 50 states for a vote.

Each state has its own process of ratifying the vote, but the key point remains the same - in order to become part of the Constitution, a proposed amendment must receive Yea votes from 38 of the 50 states in order to become a Constitutional Amendment.

This means that 3/4ths of the US states must vote yea in order for the Amendment to become part of the Constitution. If not, it will fail.

There is a second way that an Amendment could be added to the Constitution, and this would involve 2/3rds of the US states calling a Convention to amend the Constitution. Again, this proposed Amendment would still have to be ratified by 75% of the country's State Legislatures.