otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 46,666
- 15,617
- 2,165
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, Scroll back and you will see I listed at least 3 of them.Several?
Like who? Lord Muckington?
Why would anyone waste time on the 3 offered people you claim are experts on climate.No, Scroll back and you will see I listed at least 3 of them.
The problem is that we have nearly double the carbon in the atmosphere, and carbon traps heat.
It does not let it radiate back out into space.
The reason Antarctica is "responding less rapidly to climate change" is because it is more in the shade. The axis shifts to aim the north pole more at the sun, as it wobbles. But the south pole does not wobble and never points at the sun. The ice is also much thicker and older in the south pole, so there is a lot of thermal mass inertia to over come.
Sure we are only guessing, but we know gas changes have altered the climate in the past, and we are pretty sure carbon is the most significant factor. We can also duplicate it in miniature lab experiments. So the odds are it is real and will happen.
Nor is there any reason to not stop the carbon emissions. We are running out and they are getting too expensive anyway. The alternatives like hydrogen, bio fuels, etc. make more sense and can be sustained forever.
Nope. Science illiterates struggle with math.So you agree that in summer, 3 more degrees is fine??
Sure, and I’m an astronaut.I am a pilot.
Duh….no shit. They are both losing ice at different rates. I wonder why ? Do you have a point?Compared to the Arctic, Antarctica is responding less rapidly to climate change.
We agree per what you said to me.Duh….no shit. They are both losing ice at different rates. I wonder why ? Do you have a point?
That , the average temps are getting warmer in both places …you have a point ? The Arctic is warming faster…dah.We agree per what you said to me.
First, you need to believe in evolution to under stand that question. My guess is, you don’t. That makes anything anyone says about AGW, over your head.It does not say with a certainty it will harm us!
Evolution is true. It is also Biology. It has nothing to do with Climate.First, you need to believe in evolution to under stand that question. My guess is, you don’t. That makes anything anyone says about AGW, over your head.
If that is what I told you, we agree. If it is not what I told you, you lied.That , the average temps are getting warmer in both places …you have a point ? The Arctic is warming faster…dah.
My point is, BFD….if you actually knew why the Arctic is cooling faster, you’d believe in AGW. Tell us.If that is what I told you, we agree. If it is not what I told you, you lied.
Ha ha. It has EVERYTHING to do with AGW,Evolution is true. It is also Biology. It has nothing to do with Climate.
Biology isn’t related to AGW ? NEARLY everything is related to AGW. Immigration, wars, and Trump being voted president, once and only once.Evolution is true. It is also Biology. It has nothing to do with Climate.
Bob uses ice in his drinks and claims that disproves climate change.Duh….no shit. They are both losing ice at different rates. I wonder why ? Do you have a point?
Amazing how deniers just make up shit when there are only 30 k sites that provide all the answers.Bob uses ice in his drinks and claims that disproves climate change.
I think you have the intelligence of a 3rd grader. Don't respond if you agree.Amazing how deniers just make up shit when there are only 30 k sites that provide all the answers.
Evolution is true. It is also Biology. It has nothing to do with Climate.
I see. I was not talking about Darwinian Evolution. This might help.Darwinian evolution, as contrasted from adaptation, or microevolution, is a fraud that has been perpetuated since Haeckel's fraudulent drawings were exposed in a court of law in the 1850's. Haeckel lied and scientists repeated his lies for over 100 years, most recently around 2000 in a biology book.
I have exposed the insuperable statistics of original protein synthesis on these pages, which conclusively refute Darwinism.
Briefly, titin is the largest protein in humans at 63, 318 amino acid residues in length.
The first titin molecule could only have been organized by overcoming the impossible odds of 1/20 to the 63,318 x 1/2 to the 63,318 x 1/2 to the 63,318.
That's for one protein. Humans have over 20,000 different proteins inside them.
Q.E.D.