CDZ Should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to look into the illegal surveillance activities of obama?

[2aguy]

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied On Americans For Years

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

 

[tigerred59]

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied On Americans For Years

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

Should he do this before or after he's released from prison? Just askin!! LOLOLOLO

 

[Eaglewings]

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

[URL='http://www.dailywire.com/news/16804/report-obama-illegally-spied-americans-years-ben-shapiro']Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied On Americans For Years

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

On Americans For Years[/URL]

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

If people think that they have any privacy think again.. Internet, cell phones, camera's on the streets and stores and satellites not only watch you, but use that info to get you to buy more than you wanted to in the stores..Russian bots that redirect you to fake news during the election..

Apps on computers and phones to spy on each other,

 

[2aguy]

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied On Americans For Years

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

Should he do this before or after he's released from prison? Just askin!! LOLOLOLOView attachment 128555

When you guys can find or make up a crime that will send him to prison....let us know....

 

[tigerred59]

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied On Americans For Years

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

Should he do this before or after he's released from prison? Just askin!! LOLOLOLOView attachment 128555

When you guys can find or make up a crime that will send him to prison....let us know....

Listen, for 8 years, 8 long long long long years, the intel community kept tell you and the american stupid, that they had nothing on Hillary and it never stopped you nuts, not once. So expect Karma, with or without solid proof, this is gonna haunt that nut to the grave.

 

[2aguy]

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied On Americans For Years

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

Should he do this before or after he's released from prison? Just askin!! LOLOLOLOView attachment 128555

When you guys can find or make up a crime that will send him to prison....let us know....

Listen, for 8 years, 8 long long long long years, the intel community kept tell you and the american stupid, that they had nothing on Hillary and it never stopped you nuts, not once. So expect Karma, with or without solid proof, this is gonna haunt that nut to the grave.

They didn't say that........comey pointed out crime after crime just before he said he wasn't going to prosecute her.....everything she did in relation to that server was a felony. And that doesn't include the money in bribes she took from the Russians through her foundation when she was secretary of state.

 

[tigerred59]

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied On Americans For Years

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

Should he do this before or after he's released from prison? Just askin!! LOLOLOLOView attachment 128555

When you guys can find or make up a crime that will send him to prison....let us know....

Listen, for 8 years, 8 long long long long years, the intel community kept tell you and the american stupid, that they had nothing on Hillary and it never stopped you nuts, not once. So expect Karma, with or without solid proof, this is gonna haunt that nut to the grave.

They didn't say that........comey pointed out crime after crime just before he said he wasn't going to prosecute her.....everything she did in relation to that server was a felony. And that doesn't include the money in bribes she took from the Russians through her foundation when she was secretary of state.

No he did not, Comey pointed out improper conduct, Comey told the press that Clinton's handling of classified information was no crime. She had been "extremely careless," he said, but "no reasonable prosecutor" could bring a case against her. no crime there at all. Look, don't play this cherry picking crap with me, I'm not white, I'm not stupid and I got brain cells, that actually work

 

[2aguy]

This just out...and it begs the question....should Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the illegal surveillance and unmasking of U.S. citizens by obama...for the purpose of undermining the opposition political party, and to undermine the election process?

Report: Obama NSA Illegally Spied On Americans For Years

Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.

What does this mean in plain language? It means that the Obama administration increased the number of searches involving Americans by a factor of three, and unmasked far more Americans than before 2011. Circa quotes the ACLU as stating that these are “some of the most serious [violations] to ever be documented and strongly call into question the US intelligence community’s ability to police itself.” In October, just before the election, the NSA said that it told the court that it had boosted its surveillance, and even stated in April that the “NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target.”

Should he do this before or after he's released from prison? Just askin!! LOLOLOLOView attachment 128555

When you guys can find or make up a crime that will send him to prison....let us know....

Listen, for 8 years, 8 long long long long years, the intel community kept tell you and the american stupid, that they had nothing on Hillary and it never stopped you nuts, not once. So expect Karma, with or without solid proof, this is gonna haunt that nut to the grave.

They didn't say that........comey pointed out crime after crime just before he said he wasn't going to prosecute her.....everything she did in relation to that server was a felony. And that doesn't include the money in bribes she took from the Russians through her foundation when she was secretary of state.

No he did not, Comey pointed out improper conduct, Comey told the press that Clinton's handling of classified information was no crime. She had been "extremely careless," he said, but "no reasonable prosecutor" could bring a case against her. no crime there at all. Look, don't play this cherry picking crap with me, I'm not white, I'm not stupid and I got brain cells, that actually work

No...not improper...completely illegal conduct....every act she did was illegal.....and a felony. And "intent" is not a protection from the illegal act......there are people in jail today who did less than she did....

 

[william the wie]

Mueller's mandate includes both parties and anything to do with the election so relax.