bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,332
- 2,180
How can anyone be deaf while typing?You wish a jury virdict can be voided at any time if new evidence is found.The FBI can refuse or grant anything it it wishes .The FBI refused to allow independent verification of their so-called "findings." It then claimed it could not afford to independently verify them. Does that sound the slightest bit suspicious to you?
So tell us, Mr. Waco expert, where is the evidence that they weren't legal? Are there any sworn affidavits that they weren't? Is there a report from any forensics lab showing they weren't legal? Is there any published evidence that there were explosives in the Waco compound? What about the warrant? Has that ever been published? Oh, that's right, it was sealed by the same judge who issued it.
Even if you could produce all this evidence, which you can't, would that justify slaughtering dozens innocent women and children?
The FBI and the ATF have been caught contradicting themselves and making incriminating statements countless times. Their explanations just don't add up.
Keep in mind that all the Waco defendants were declared "not guilty" by a jury of their peers. You have to be a special kind of bootlicker not to notice the unholy stench rising from this case.
BTW, the local sheriff visited the compound on several occasions because of complaints he had received. He was allowed to walk right into the building without any shots being fired. He inspected their weapons on these occasions and deemed them legal.
Congress has not questioned their results for over 20 years .
Actually, not. The FBI cannot legally refuse to provide defence counsel with reasonable access to evidence that might exonerate the defendants, and that's exactly what it did.
Here's a clue for you: none of the Waco defendants were convicted of anything. A jury pronounced the FBI's charges to be bogus. That counts a lot more than the opinion of a gang of paid-off humbug politicians.
Huh? That seems to be what you want, not me.
This is not about me .
I'm just pointing out the massive flaws in your knowledge of the law and your general lack of sanity.
.
You can't even post intelligible English, let alone point out flaws in anyone's logic.