justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 34,102
- 26,983
- 2,905
I say.....Hell no.
Following on the heels of one of the ugliest political cut downs in modern history, the left is at it again with a propensity to cook the flesh of their own in order to prepare supper for the chosen.
Some have suggested that this would relieve Harris from the responsibility of having to confirm her own election loss when the time comes. Some have suggested that it would be a better arrangement considering the pardons that are probably slated for early December.
Others are simply into the cheap publicity of stealing the number 47 for a woman president the history is never going to see as legitimate. What say you?
Following on the heels of one of the ugliest political cut downs in modern history, the left is at it again with a propensity to cook the flesh of their own in order to prepare supper for the chosen.
Some have suggested that this would relieve Harris from the responsibility of having to confirm her own election loss when the time comes. Some have suggested that it would be a better arrangement considering the pardons that are probably slated for early December.
Others are simply into the cheap publicity of stealing the number 47 for a woman president the history is never going to see as legitimate. What say you?
Last edited: