Should Foreigners who Censor American's Free Speech be Invited to Move Here? Rubio says #%#& NO!

[Seymour Flops]

Okay, he doesn't swear. Here is what he said:

Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil. It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States. We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech.

Link:

Technical Difficulties

Obviously, those are not people who will contribute anything positive to the United States or to Americans.

Even if you like the censorship, save those jobs for basement-dwelling American incels, not "Bradley" in India.

 

[1srelluc]

It's a thing and we don't need anymore Brits here.

The relationship between ARFCOM and the British police has been characterized by a series of demands and challenges. ARFCOM has been known to flex on content moderation, and there have been rumors of the UK internet police flexing on ARFCom to remove content they deemed inappropriate. This has led to discussions and debates within the community about the role of ARFCOM and the British police in regulating online content.

ar15.com

 

[Seymour Flops]

It's a thing and we don't need anymore Brits here.

No we surely do not.

The relationship between ARFCOM and the British police has been characterized by a series of demands and challenges. ARFCOM has been known to flex on content moderation, and there have been rumors of the UK internet police flexing on ARFCom to remove content they deemed inappropriate. This has led to discussions and debates within the community about the role of ARFCOM and the British police in regulating online content.
ar15.com

Brits abhor freedom? Well, thats their call.

Toughest foriegn policy lesson I had to learn is that Democracy and freedom just aren't for everyone.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Okay, he doesn't swear. Here is what he said:

Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil. It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States. We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech.

Link:

Technical Difficulties

Obviously, those are not people who will contribute anything positive to the United States or to Americans.

Even if you like the censorship, save those jobs for basement-dwelling American incels, not "Bradley" in India.

I agree with Trumps administration finally defending U.S Values. Your Constitution is envied by citizens around the globe, only weak, fascist governments wish to undermine it.

Ask any citizen "would you prefer to be free or owned by an Overlord government"? Only the most weak of men would vote for the latter.

Vance, Rubio, Trump, RFK, Gabbard, the whole team need to stand up for civil liberties and those citizens who spit on American Values should not be allowed to spread their hatred within America.

 

[White 6]

It's a thing and we don't need anymore Brits here.

The relationship between ARFCOM and the British police has been characterized by a series of demands and challenges. ARFCOM has been known to flex on content moderation, and there have been rumors of the UK internet police flexing on ARFCom to remove content they deemed inappropriate. This has led to discussions and debates within the community about the role of ARFCOM and the British police in regulating online content.
ar15.com

Matthew Quigley said it best?

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

It's a thing and we don't need anymore Brits here.

The relationship between ARFCOM and the British police has been characterized by a series of demands and challenges. ARFCOM has been known to flex on content moderation, and there have been rumors of the UK internet police flexing on ARFCom to remove content they deemed inappropriate. This has led to discussions and debates within the community about the role of ARFCOM and the British police in regulating online content.
ar15.com

And we need less Muslims here. Exactly zero. They are incompatible with western civilization. I'm for the president declaring Martial Law, which suspends the Constitution. Once that is done, round up every Muslim and as Communism would end those freedoms we've enjoyed, ship them out and end immigration and acceptance of so-called refugees. Period.

 

[Augustine_]

Okay, he doesn't swear. Here is what he said:

Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil. It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States. We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech.

Link:

Technical Difficulties

Obviously, those are not people who will contribute anything positive to the United States or to Americans.

Even if you like the censorship, save those jobs for basement-dwelling American incels, not "Bradley" in India.

The party of government imposed censorship doesn't like foreigners regardless of whether or not they like censorship

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And we need less Muslims here. Exactly zero. They are incompatible with western civilization. I'm for the president declaring Martial Law, which suspends the Constitution. Once that is done, round up every Muslim and as Communism would end those freedoms we've enjoyed, ship them out and end immigration and acceptance of so-called refugees. Period.

Where did you get that silly idea?