Should Congress pass legislation to make drug companies liable for vaccine damage? If the vaccines are “safe and effective”, no need for immunity.

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
59,259
Reaction score
64,482
Points
3,615
All the drug companies have immunity from liability from vax damage, while claiming all vaccines are “safe and effective”.

Congress should hold ALL COMPANIES LIABLE FOR THE DAMAGE THEIR PRODUCTS CAUSE….FROM CIGARETTES TO WEED TO CARS TO AIRPLANES TO DRUGS.
 
All the drug companies have immunity from liability from vax damage, while claiming all vaccines are “safe and effective”.

Congress should hold ALL COMPANIES LIABLE FOR THE DAMAGE THEIR PRODUCTS CAUSE….FROM CIGARETTES TO WEED TO CARS TO AIRPLANES TO DRUGS.
You appear angry. You want to be in an iron lung or something?
 
Cool, now do firearm companies.

Why do you want people to have iron lungs and die from smallpox again?

That's a false equivalency. Nobody was ever coerced by social media, their peers, or government agencies to purchase a firearm. We went through three whole years where being vaccinated was more or less mandatory for many jobs, including the military.
 
That's a false equivalency. Nobody was ever coerced by social media, their peers, or government agencies to purchase a firearm. We went through three whole years where being vaccinated was more or less mandatory for many jobs, including the military.

Lefties gonna lefty.

Firearms are DESIGNED TO KILL PEOPLE.

If you kill someone with a firearm, it worked perfectly.

Fucking retarded agrument.
 
If a gun had a manufacturing defect and exploded with normal use and injured the user….the company would be liable.

If the person shoots some one with it, it means it worked as intended,

Should GINSU be liable for stabbings?
 
All the drug companies have immunity from liability from vax damage, while claiming all vaccines are “safe and effective”.

Congress should hold ALL COMPANIES LIABLE FOR THE DAMAGE THEIR PRODUCTS CAUSE….FROM CIGARETTES TO WEED TO CARS TO AIRPLANES TO DRUGS.

Vaccines require human testing. Unlike crash test dummies, haven't invented a substitute for that yet. Maybe in another 100 years.
 
That's a false equivalency. Nobody was ever coerced by social media, their peers, or government agencies to purchase a firearm. We went through three whole years where being vaccinated was more or less mandatory for many jobs, including the military.
You also want iron lungs?
Peers aren't persuasive to buy firearms?
 
Why would anyone be against a company being held liable for damages caused by their products?
Like gun makers? Who have product immunity.

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a federal law that protects gun manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers from civil liability for the criminal misuse of their products
 
Lefties gonna lefty.

Firearms are DESIGNED TO KILL PEOPLE.

If you kill someone with a firearm, it worked perfectly.

Fucking retarded agrument.

You didn't answer the question. You want Polio and Smallpox back? Whooping Cough?

If you don't like them, don't take them.
 
Back to vaccines. If they are SAFE AND EFFECTIVE AND MANDATED, there should be liability by the manufacturer and all studies on humans should be transparently released to the public.
 
This drug company liability thread has turned into a gun control thread.

Fucking lefties
 
Last edited:
Back to vaccines. If they are SAFE AND EFFECTIVE AND MANDATED, there should be liability by the manufacturer and all studies on humans should be transparently released to the public.
Why?

State mandates for vaccines are state issues and usually have exemptions for the religious or being mentally impaired.
 
The is drug company liability thread has turned into a gun control thread.

Fucking lefties
You lied. its not our fault.

Aren't iron lungs great?
1732118996405.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom