Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings?

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Now a hundred or so pages back, a mouthier contingent of the Advocacy to Normalize sexual Abnormality was challenged to profess her adherence to or rejection of the adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification. Two down pages saw this challenge consistently advanced and consistently ignored.

If you'll go back and read the record of this thread... you'll find that NO OTHER member of the Homo-lobby found ANY means to set themselves distinct from the Adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification... and such has remained consistent to THIS VERY POINT, despite THOUSANDS of opportunity to DO SO.

Now... has it ever occurred to any of you why that might be?

Actually, I hear them draw that distinction all the time. Maybe you just hear what you want to hear.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Now a hundred or so pages back, a mouthier contingent of the Advocacy to Normalize sexual Abnormality was challenged to profess her adherence to or rejection of the adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification and WHY. Two down pages saw this challenge consistently advanced and consistently ignored.

If you'll go back and read the record of this thread... you'll find that NO OTHER member of the Homo-lobby found ANY means to set themselves distinct from the Adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification... and such has remained consistent to THIS VERY POINT, despite THOUSANDS of opportunity to DO SO.

Now... has it ever occurred to any of you why that might be?

Actually, I hear them draw that distinction all the time. Maybe you just hear what you want to hear.

So you haven't been even the slightest bit curious, even as YOU DEFLECT FROM THE SUBJECT OF THE QUERY YOURSELF?

The issue was NOT 'the distinction' the issue was IF THEY REJECT IT OR NOT AND ON WHAT BASIS THEY REST THEIR ADVOCACY?

But... since you've offered up the obscurant response, we should clear up your position on the Adult pursuit of Children for Sexual Gratification... Are you FOR IT OR AGAINST IT?

AND WHY?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

LOL!... Ya seem a little hesitant.

Most folks (The Normal ones...) they usually have an immediate response... and they've no trouble tellin' ya why.

Yet you... seem to be suffering an inexplicable bout of reticence.

"Whazzup wihdat?"

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Nothin' comin' to mind ... ?

 

[Jarlaxle]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.


Long term exposure to pornography normalizes sexual stimulation through redundant exposure to stimuli... such exposure drives the individual to craving farther and farther down the stimulus rabbit hole, wherein 'normal' sexual visuals no longer provides stimulation and the subject craves material of a more forbidden nature... left unchecked, by an individual who is incapable of objective reason, finds their behavior 'NORMAL', the subject will crave action of a forbidden nature to satisfy more and more obsessive, compulsive cravings.

All of which could readily be resolved by a modicum of humility and the means to reason objectively.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

You now need to have a neutral third party examine your computer for evidence of lesbian pornography.

 

[JakeStarkey]

wherermykeys computer is loaded with the crap

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Golly... it was all up in the discussion... responding in real time for two hours. Then just as it was establishin' that NO ONE was lookin' for a pass into the Kiddie pool... BAM! A question comes along that shuts the entire discussion down.


ROFLMNAO! Yes... It is a burden and being right all the time IS as enjoyable as it looks like it is.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.


Long term exposure to pornography normalizes sexual stimulation through redundant exposure to stimuli... such exposure drives the individual to craving farther and farther down the stimulus rabbit hole, wherein 'normal' sexual visuals no longer provides stimulation and the subject craves material of a more forbidden nature... left unchecked, by an individual who is incapable of objective reason, finds their behavior 'NORMAL', the subject will crave action of a forbidden nature to satisfy more and more obsessive, compulsive cravings.

All of which could readily be resolved by a modicum of humility and the means to reason objectively.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

You now need to have a neutral third party examine your computer for evidence of lesbian pornography.

Why? Because you need to project that 'everybody does it'?

Lemme ask ya... does 'everyone doin' it', somehow make it right?

If so, why?

If not, why not?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.


Long term exposure to pornography normalizes sexual stimulation through redundant exposure to stimuli... such exposure drives the individual to craving farther and farther down the stimulus rabbit hole, wherein 'normal' sexual visuals no longer provides stimulation and the subject craves material of a more forbidden nature... left unchecked, by an individual who is incapable of objective reason, finds their behavior 'NORMAL', the subject will crave action of a forbidden nature to satisfy more and more obsessive, compulsive cravings.

All of which could readily be resolved by a modicum of humility and the means to reason objectively.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

You now need to have a neutral third party examine your computer for evidence of lesbian pornography.

Why? Because you need to project that 'everybody does it'?

Lemme ask ya... does 'everyone doin' it', somehow make it right?

If so, why?

If not, why not?

Explain, as simply as possible, why the overwhelming number of perps are heterosexual men preying on young girls?

 

[Jarlaxle]

Why? Because you need to project that 'everybody does it'?

Lemme ask ya... does 'everyone doin' it', somehow make it right?

If so, why?

If not, why not?

Just because I wonder if you are as much of a hypocrite as I expect. You seem to be fulled with moral indignation, which is often accompanied by a heaping helping of hypocrisy!

"Most moral indignation is 2% moral, 48% indignation, and 50% envy."
-Ambrose Bierce

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why? Because you need to project that 'everybody does it'?

Lemme ask ya... does 'everyone doin' it', somehow make it right?

If so, why?

If not, why not?

Just because I wonder if you are as much of a hypocrite as I expect. You seem to be fulled with moral indignation, which is often accompanied by a heaping helping of hypocrisy!

"Most moral indignation is 2% moral, 48% indignation, and 50% envy."
-Ambrose Bierce

It is mostly gas for wherermykeys.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Golly... it was all up in the discussion... responding in real time for two hours. Then just as it was establishin' that NO ONE was lookin' for a pass into the Kiddie pool... BAM! A question comes along that shuts the entire discussion down.


ROFLMNAO! Yes... It is a burden and being right all the time IS as enjoyable as it looks like it is.

The next time you're right

will be the first

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

LOL!

While we wait in the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality to figure out what the right answer is in response to the question: "Do you approve of Adults pursuing Children for sexual gratification?"

We should discuss that 90% of the board's respondents to the OP's Poll... do NOT feel that Preachers should be forced to promote the pretense that Marriage is something besides the joining of one man and one woman.

ROFL... And even on a board populated with a Leftist Majority... ya can't find popular support.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Golly... it was all up in the discussion... responding in real time for two hours. Then just as it was establishin' that NO ONE was lookin' for a pass into the Kiddie pool... BAM! A question comes along that shuts the entire discussion down.


ROFLMNAO! Yes... It is a burden and being right all the time IS as enjoyable as it looks like it is.

The next time you're right

will be the first

Well sound reasoning NEVER requires validation, but it is always nice when it comes along.

Mighty sweet of ya young lady. Thank you.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Why? Because you need to project that 'everybody does it'?

Lemme ask ya... does 'everyone doin' it', somehow make it right?

If so, why?

If not, why not?

Just because I wonder if you are as much of a hypocrite as I expect. You seem to be fulled with moral indignation, which is often accompanied by a heaping helping of hypocrisy!

"Most moral indignation is 2% moral, 48% indignation, and 50% envy."
-Ambrose Bierce

So... you feel that where I am a hypocrite, that my stated position would be less true?

Now I see that you're not big on fleshing out the basis for your public professions, but I would be remiss not to ask: On what is it that you're setting that drivel?

And please... be specific. At least as specific as your intellectual limitations allow.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Golly... it was all up in the discussion... responding in real time for two hours. Then just as it was establishin' that NO ONE was lookin' for a pass into the Kiddie pool... BAM! A question comes along that shuts the entire discussion down.


ROFLMNAO! Yes... It is a burden and being right all the time IS as enjoyable as it looks like it is.

The next time you're right

will be the first

Well sound reasoning NEVER requires validation, it is always nice when it comes along.

Mighty sweet of ya young lady. Thank you.

I think you meant to type "While sound reasoning..........."

Nevertheless, you have shown NO signs of sound reasoning within this thread.

I mean for the love of God, you don't even understand that pedophiles are not sexually attracted to adults of either sex , therefor they don't fit the definition of either homosexual or heterosexual.

Using your "logic" if JakeStarkey anally raped you, you would now be gay because you had homosexual sex.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I think you meant to type "While sound reasoning..........."

Oh... I hate that for ya.

Nevertheless, you have shown NO signs of sound reasoning within this thread.

Really? One presumes then that somewhere in the below comments we'll find your evidence, wherein you've provided an example of something I've said and specific identification of fatal flaws in the respective reasoning.

Let's see how ya do.

I mean for the love of God, you don't even understand that pedophiles are not sexually attracted to adults of either sex , therefor they don't fit the definition of either homosexual or heterosexual.

Hmm... that's weird. 'Cause, there's nothin' there... except your own invalid reasoning (Straw, appeal to popularity.)

Using your "logic" if JakeStarkey anally raped you, you would now be gay because you had homosexual sex.

LOL! Whatta shame... Seemed like you were a reasonable person there for a moment.

OH WELL! Ya did the best ya could and no one can take that from ya.

 

[JakeStarkey]

wheremykeys and Sil do not understand that are not entitled to their own facts and definitions and terms. Those are set already with objectivity.

They believe opinions are evidence.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Just to remind the board...

We're still waiting on a response to this:

Now a hundred or so pages back, a mouthier contingent of the Advocacy to Normalize sexual Abnormality was challenged to profess her adherence to or rejection of the adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification and WHY. Two down pages saw this challenge consistently advanced and consistently ignored.

If you'll go back and read the record of this thread... you'll find that NO OTHER member of the Homo-lobby found ANY means to set themselves distinct from the Adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification... and such has remained consistent to THIS VERY POINT, despite THOUSANDS of opportunity to DO SO.

Now... has it ever occurred to any of you why that might be?

Actually, I hear them draw that distinction all the time. Maybe you just hear what you want to hear.

So you haven't been even the slightest bit curious, even as YOU DEFLECT FROM THE SUBJECT OF THE QUERY YOURSELF?

The issue was NOT 'the distinction' the issue was IF THEY REJECT IT OR NOT AND ON WHAT BASIS THEY REST THEIR ADVOCACY?

But... since you've offered up the obscurant response, we should clear up your position on the Adult pursuit of Children for Sexual Gratification... Are you FOR IT OR AGAINST IT?

AND WHY?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Just to remind the Board, we are waiting on wherermykeys to realize his opinions are not evidence.