Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there is no upper limit under Capitalism.![]()
You know what’s not cool anymore? Billionaires.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Elizabeth Warren believe some Americans have too much money, and they’re not alone.
Their very existence is now the subject of political debate, sparked most recently by tax-the-rich proposals from two prominent politicians.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) proposed placing a 2 percent tax on wealth over $50 million and 3 percent on assets over $1 billion. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said she wants to increase the marginal tax rate on those earning more than $10 million a year.
Their ideas went viral, starting a mainstream conversation about inequality and wealth.
This kind of talk has always existed among a certain group of hard-core progressives and left-leaning economists, but heading into next year’s presidential election, the idea that the super-rich should pay their fair share is gaining real momentum.
Marshall Steinbaum, a research director at the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute, has advocated taxing the rich at higher rates for years. “We do not need billionaires,” Steinbaum told HuffPost. “The economy’s done better without billionaires in the past.”
For Steinbaum, higher taxes on the wealthy would mean freeing up more money for everyone else. If you think of the economy as a pie, right now, billionaires are getting just about all of it, while we’re all left splitting just one slice.
If you raise taxes on the richest, their incentive to grab at every morsel declines. The theory is they’ll fight a little less hard to depress everyone else’s wages if they know that every extra million is going to get taxed away. A high-paid CEO has less incentive to keep workers’ wages low so he can get a bigger payday.
Billionaires were once a rare breed. In the past few decades, as the U.S. has slashed tax rates, their numbers have exploded, far outpacing inflation.
Since 2008, the number of billionaires in the world has doubled, according to a report published last week by the anti-poverty nonprofit Oxfam. In just the last year, billionaires raked in an astonishing $2.5 billion each day.
In 1982, the first year Forbes debuted its list of the 400 richest Americans, there were about a dozen billionaires. The richest man in the U.S. back then was an 85-year-old shipping magnate with an estimated worth of $2 billion, or $5.2 billion in today’s dollars.
"We do not need billionaires. The economy’s done better without billionaires in the past."
--Marshall Steinbaum, Roosevelt Institute
Nowadays, Forbes’ list is entirely billionaires. The richest is Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, worth $160 billion.
More: Should Billionaires Even Exist?
I agree! Billionaires aren't cool anymore! The playing field is tilted like the Titanic before it went down. There is no logical reason for so few to have so much. What do you think?
"The playing field is tiltedI agree! Billionaires aren't cool anymore! The playing field is tilted like the Titanic before it went down. There is no logical reason for so few to have so much. What do you think?
/—-/ OK libtard, what is a fair amount?The rich already pay far more than a fair share.
No, they don't.
70% above $10 million. Just like AOC said.
Yup, as long as it's the other person paying it.Interesting how most billionaires are progs.
Yeah, that is interesting. Got any proof? Regardless, they should all be paying more taxes.

The rich already pay far more than a fair share.
Not even close
Correct. Not even close. They don't even pay enough for the military to protect their assets.
Yup, as long as it's the other person paying it.Interesting how most billionaires are progs.
Yeah, that is interesting. Got any proof? Regardless, they should all be paying more taxes.![]()
They pay far more than that. if the top 1% pay 40% of the taxes, that means they pay $1.8 trillion, which far exceeds the military budget. However, why should they be solely responsible for the military budget? The military protects you from having ISIS cut your head off. Don't you believe you're obligated to pay for that?The rich already pay far more than a fair share.
Not even close
Correct. Not even close. They don't even pay enough for the military to protect their assets.
We should all be paying less taxes. Government is at best a huge waste of money.Interesting how most billionaires are progs.
Yeah, that is interesting. Got any proof? Regardless, they should all be paying more taxes.
Microsoft created 200,000 millionaires.It is obvious that every one of the tens of thousands of people that are receiving a weekly paycheck from Microsoft are damn glad Bill Gates exist.
Come election time all these Moon Bats are damn glad George Soros exist and has so much money to give to the despicable bat shit crazy Democrat candidates that they vote for.
That's how it starts, Lakhota, eventually you'll become part of it, also.Yup, as long as it's the other person paying it.Interesting how most billionaires are progs.
Yeah, that is interesting. Got any proof? Regardless, they should all be paying more taxes.![]()
Yup, the ones making the big bucks.
Why the Rich Should Pay Higher Taxes
Lakhota give it a rest you hate anyone with more money than you.How much is too much?
Warren has $8 million, Sanders has $2 million....
They want to share the wealth, unless it's theirs.
How much should we take from them?
Duh, the thread title says "Billionaires" - not "millionaires". A billion is 1,000 million.