Should Bill Nye be exposed as the fraud he is?

[SuperDemocrat]

I just found out he is not a scientist but holds a degree in engineering. Maybe his show should have been called Bill Nye the Engineering guy. Shouldn't advertisers get their money back since they were backing a show about a scientist not an engineer.

 

[EriktheRed]

I just found out he is not a scientist but holds a degree in engineering. Maybe his show should have been called Bill Nye the Engineering guy. Shouldn't advertisers get their money back since they were backing a show about a scientist not an engineer.

Did Snowflake Snooki tell you to post this?

 

[SuperDemocrat]

I just found out he is not a scientist but holds a degree in engineering. Maybe his show should have been called Bill Nye the Engineering guy. Shouldn't advertisers get their money back since they were backing a show about a scientist not an engineer.

Did Snowflake Snooki tell you to post this?

Perhaps a lawyer would like to get rich by suing the shit out of the company that sold that product. It is kind of fraud to pretend that the guy named Bill Nye is a scientist when he wasn't. I doubt he ever held a beaker in his entire life.

 

[EriktheRed]

I just found out he is not a scientist but holds a degree in engineering. Maybe his show should have been called Bill Nye the Engineering guy. Shouldn't advertisers get their money back since they were backing a show about a scientist not an engineer.

Did Snowflake Snooki tell you to post this?

Perhaps a lawyer would like to get rich by suing the shit out of the company that sold that product. It is kind of fraud to pretend that the guy named Bill Nye is a scientist when he wasn't. I doubt he ever held a beaker in his entire life.

You really aren't very bright, are you.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

I just found out he is not a scientist but holds a degree in engineering. Maybe his show should have been called Bill Nye the Engineering guy. Shouldn't advertisers get their money back since they were backing a show about a scientist not an engineer.

Did Snowflake Snooki tell you to post this?

Perhaps a lawyer would like to get rich by suing the shit out of the company that sold that product. It is kind of fraud to pretend that the guy named Bill Nye is a scientist when he wasn't. I doubt he ever held a beaker in his entire life.

You really aren't very bright, are you.

Name calling...so intelligent.

 

[mdk]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

No they are not. People with degrees are not scientist either.

 

[Muhammed]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

Not necessarily. The terms are not mutually inclusive nor exclusive.

Bill Nye is not a scientist.

 

[mdk]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

No they are not. People with degrees are not scientist either.

You clearly know nothing of mechanical engineering.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

No they are not. People with degrees are not scientist either.

You clearly know nothing of mechanical engineering.

I find your way of thinking dangerous to science and critical thought. I don't know much about engineering but I figure that a scientist usually does research and experiments to either back up an hypothesis or disprove something. I'm constantly being told by the left that this is real science and scream what they just learned from some guy named Bill Nye the science guy at someone and don't stop until they fully agree with them. How are you suppose to set up something where you can prove your disagreement with someone if you can't even do the experiment that would do so? Many universities don't fund anti-global warming studies at all so if one scientist (or mechanichal engineer as you put it) can't do his experiment then how do we know if global warming is real if no one can get the opportunity to counter act its reasoning. This could explain why there are so few scientist who don't agree with man made global warming. They either can't get the funding for it or are to afraid to speak out against it for fear of being treated as a cast out by their peers.

 

[MaryL]

I like this, lets question science. Science is all about questions and facts. Religion is all about dogma. Science gave us freeking computers and the internet, what has religion gave us lately? I am left scratching my head here.

 

[mdk]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

No they are not. People with degrees are not scientist either.

You clearly know nothing of mechanical engineering.

I find your way of thinking dangerous to science and critical thought. I don't know much about engineering but I figure that a scientist usually does research and experiments to either back up an hypothesis or disprove something. I'm constantly being told by the left that this is real science and scream what they just learned from some guy named Bill Nye the science guy at someone and don't stop until they fully agree with them. How are you suppose to set up something where you can prove your disagreement with someone if you can't even do the experiment that would do so? Many universities don't fund anti-global warming studies at all so if one scientist (or mechanichal engineer as you put it) can't do his experiment then how do we know if global warming is real if no one can get the opportunity to counter act its reasoning. This could explain why there are so few scientist who don't agree with man made global warming. They either can't get the funding for it or are to afraid to speak out against it for fear of being treated as a cast out by their peers.

Whether you agree with his position on global warming or not doesn't take away from the fact that the man is still a scientist.

 

[Avatar4321]

Who the heck cares about Bill Nye in A political forum?

 

[SuperDemocrat]

I like this, lets question science. Science is all about questions and facts. religion is all about dogma. Science gave us the freeking computers and the internet, what has religion gave us lately? I am left scratching my head here.

Let actually question scientist. I like the idea of questioning things because it makes me a critical thinker and I think questioning things is good so we should encourage people to question a lot of things. That would include religion. I think religion can get pretty insane sometimes especially when no one can question the motives of the parishioners. It is good to question religion because...mmm...maybe making women wear painful and degrading burkas in the hot sun all day is just plain unfair.

I believe it was Aristotle who said question everything. I think he actually would include scientist in that.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Who the heck cares about Bill Nye in A political forum?

He kind of stepped into it by mentioning global warming. I just thought we should remember that his show is based on a lie.

 

[Kosh]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

No they are not. People with degrees are not scientist either.

You clearly know nothing of mechanical engineering.

I find your way of thinking dangerous to science and critical thought. I don't know much about engineering but I figure that a scientist usually does research and experiments to either back up an hypothesis or disprove something. I'm constantly being told by the left that this is real science and scream what they just learned from some guy named Bill Nye the science guy at someone and don't stop until they fully agree with them. How are you suppose to set up something where you can prove your disagreement with someone if you can't even do the experiment that would do so? Many universities don't fund anti-global warming studies at all so if one scientist (or mechanichal engineer as you put it) can't do his experiment then how do we know if global warming is real if no one can get the opportunity to counter act its reasoning. This could explain why there are so few scientist who don't agree with man made global warming. They either can't get the funding for it or are to afraid to speak out against it for fear of being treated as a cast out by their peers.

Whether you agree with his position on global warming or not doesn't take away from the fact that the man is still a scientist.

No one is true scientist promoting the AGW religion.

But as we have been told buy the AGW cult we should only listen to climatologists on the subject of "Global Warming"..

So even by the AGW cult's definition, Bill Nye is not qualified to speak about the subject!

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

No they are not. People with degrees are not scientist either.

You clearly know nothing of mechanical engineering.

I find your way of thinking dangerous to science and critical thought. I don't know much about engineering but I figure that a scientist usually does research and experiments to either back up an hypothesis or disprove something. I'm constantly being told by the left that this is real science and scream what they just learned from some guy named Bill Nye the science guy at someone and don't stop until they fully agree with them. How are you suppose to set up something where you can prove your disagreement with someone if you can't even do the experiment that would do so? Many universities don't fund anti-global warming studies at all so if one scientist (or mechanichal engineer as you put it) can't do his experiment then how do we know if global warming is real if no one can get the opportunity to counter act its reasoning. This could explain why there are so few scientist who don't agree with man made global warming. They either can't get the funding for it or are to afraid to speak out against it for fear of being treated as a cast out by their peers.

Whether you agree with his position on global warming or not doesn't take away from the fact that the man is still a scientist.

Sure. He played one on TV. Speaking of scientist. How about this guy.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

No they are not. People with degrees are not scientist either.

You clearly know nothing of mechanical engineering.

I find your way of thinking dangerous to science and critical thought. I don't know much about engineering but I figure that a scientist usually does research and experiments to either back up an hypothesis or disprove something. I'm constantly being told by the left that this is real science and scream what they just learned from some guy named Bill Nye the science guy at someone and don't stop until they fully agree with them. How are you suppose to set up something where you can prove your disagreement with someone if you can't even do the experiment that would do so? Many universities don't fund anti-global warming studies at all so if one scientist (or mechanichal engineer as you put it) can't do his experiment then how do we know if global warming is real if no one can get the opportunity to counter act its reasoning. This could explain why there are so few scientist who don't agree with man made global warming. They either can't get the funding for it or are to afraid to speak out against it for fear of being treated as a cast out by their peers.

Whether you agree with his position on global warming or not doesn't take away from the fact that the man is still a scientist.

No one is true scientist promoting the AGW religion.

But as we have been told buy the AGW cult we should only listen to climatologists on the subject of "Global Warming"..

So even by the AGW cult's definition, Bill Nye is not qualified to speak about the subject!

Damn...logic.

 

[mdk]

Mechanical engineers are not scientists?! lol

No they are not. People with degrees are not scientist either.

You clearly know nothing of mechanical engineering.

I find your way of thinking dangerous to science and critical thought. I don't know much about engineering but I figure that a scientist usually does research and experiments to either back up an hypothesis or disprove something. I'm constantly being told by the left that this is real science and scream what they just learned from some guy named Bill Nye the science guy at someone and don't stop until they fully agree with them. How are you suppose to set up something where you can prove your disagreement with someone if you can't even do the experiment that would do so? Many universities don't fund anti-global warming studies at all so if one scientist (or mechanichal engineer as you put it) can't do his experiment then how do we know if global warming is real if no one can get the opportunity to counter act its reasoning. This could explain why there are so few scientist who don't agree with man made global warming. They either can't get the funding for it or are to afraid to speak out against it for fear of being treated as a cast out by their peers.

Whether you agree with his position on global warming or not doesn't take away from the fact that the man is still a scientist.

Sure. He played one on TV. Speaking of scientist. How about this guy.

He also played one for NASA and Boeing. lol

 

[MaryL]

I like this, lets question science. Science is all about questions and facts. religion is all about dogma. Science gave us the freeking computers and the internet, what has religion gave us lately? I am left scratching my head here.

Let actually question scientist. I like the idea of questioning things because it makes me a critical thinker and I think questioning things is good so we should encourage people to question a lot of things. That would include religion. I think religion can get pretty insane sometimes especially when no one can question the motives of the parishioners. It is good to question religion because...mmm...maybe making women wear painful and degrading burkas in the hot sun all day is just plain unfair.

I believe it was Aristotle who said question everything. I think he actually would include scientist in that.

Actually, science, empirical proof, no problem questioning science, that's what it's all about. Proof of a hypothesis is a good thing. That is what this is all about. Is Allah any more real than the Easter Bunny? Goodnight, folks.