Should Big Pharma Ads Be Banned?

The purpose of the ads is to get patients and doctors aware of new innovations being cooked up in the labs of Eli Lilly.

The alternate , more traditional way, of pushing pills is to send pharm reps to doctors offices, give them free samples, buy them lunch, whatever.

How would you suggest pharm outfits let doctors know that there are new, often better , treatments for obesity or whatever?
I liked the days of free samples without jumping through the pharmacy hoops.

If it didn't work then you (or the insurance Co.) were not stuck paying for a 30-day supply.
 
The purpose of the ads is to get patients and doctors aware of new innovations being cooked up in the labs of Eli Lilly.

The alternate , more traditional way, of pushing pills is to send pharm reps to doctors offices, give them free samples, buy them lunch, whatever.

How would you suggest pharm outfits let doctors know that there are new, often better , treatments for obesity or whatever?
By dealing directly with the doctors not the patients
 
From all forms of TV! If they can ban tobacco adds from TV, we shouldn't have to suffer through this pharma onslaught.

RFK Jr wants to ban them. We are one of two countries that allows it. The other (New Zealand) is much more regulated.

They should be limited to medical magazines.

Pharma ads are nothing more than leverage to keep the news media from running stories against their industry.

Basically, they pay the network so well that nothing negative is ever broadcasted about them. Some sourses claim that 80% of TV ad revenue comes from big pharma.

Before you start, I know.....1st Amendment concerns.
So explain how it's OK to ban certain adds like tobacco products but Big Pharma is a 1A poster child?


Reading this might cause:

Spontaneous Bowel evacuation, breast enlargement in men, swollen uvula, facial boils, unknown tongue fungus, sudden debilitating chronic headache, loss of eyesight, sudden aversion to politicians, and impacted bowl syndrome!
For the bad acting alone
 
OTC meds have always been allowed so watch Big Pharma (if they have not done so already) buy out the OTC companies.

That and the commercials were better.



Even the parodies of the commercials were better.



Advertising OTC meds to the general public makes sense because the general public can get them freely.

Prescription med advertising seems to be like using a shotgun to shoot a single ant, If you assume the purpose is to make Doctors aware of the products.
 
From all forms of TV! If they can ban tobacco adds from TV, we shouldn't have to suffer through this pharma onslaught.

RFK Jr wants to ban them. We are one of two countries that allows it. The other (New Zealand) is much more regulated.

They should be limited to medical magazines.

Pharma ads are nothing more than leverage to keep the news media from running stories against their industry.

Basically, they pay the network so well that nothing negative is ever broadcasted about them. Some sourses claim that 80% of TV ad revenue comes from big pharma.

Before you start, I know.....1st Amendment concerns.
So explain how it's OK to ban certain adds like tobacco products but Big Pharma is a 1A poster child?


Reading this might cause:

Spontaneous Bowel evacuation, breast enlargement in men, swollen uvula, facial boils, unknown tongue fungus, sudden debilitating chronic headache, loss of eyesight, sudden aversion to politicians, and impacted bowl syndrome!

Pharmaceutical ads and legal ads used to be banned…I wish they still were.
 
The purpose of the ads is to get patients and doctors aware of new innovations being cooked up in the labs of Eli Lilly.

The alternate , more traditional way, of pushing pills is to send pharm reps to doctors offices, give them free samples, buy them lunch, whatever.

How would you suggest pharm outfits let doctors know that there are new, often better , treatments for obesity or whatever?
.

Back when we had pHARMa reps coming to the office, at least we GOT useful things, even if they had advertising on them. When I had my first job out of school, my kitchen was full of advertising, cups and glassware. Not to mention all those notepads!

And it was FREE!


.
 
.

I just think it really makes Americans look stupid when I watch ads that say, "Tell your doctor to prescribe our product. It can kill you."


.
 
.

I just think it really makes Americans look stupid when I watch ads that say, "Tell your doctor to prescribe our product. It can kill you."


.
It is notable that the second half of those ads describe the zillions of horrible side effects.
 
From all forms of TV! If they can ban tobacco adds from TV, we shouldn't have to suffer through this pharma onslaught.

RFK Jr wants to ban them. We are one of two countries that allows it. The other (New Zealand) is much more regulated.

They should be limited to medical magazines.

Pharma ads are nothing more than leverage to keep the news media from running stories against their industry.

Basically, they pay the network so well that nothing negative is ever broadcasted about them. Some sourses claim that 80% of TV ad revenue comes from big pharma.

Before you start, I know.....1st Amendment concerns.
So explain how it's OK to ban certain adds like tobacco products but Big Pharma is a 1A poster child?


Reading this might cause:

Spontaneous Bowel evacuation, breast enlargement in men, swollen uvula, facial boils, unknown tongue fungus, sudden debilitating chronic headache, loss of eyesight, sudden aversion to politicians, and impacted bowl syndrome!
A better question is, why was the government mandating people take the Pharma vaccines?

That seems to violate the Constitution than anything else.
 
A better question is, why was the government mandating people take the Pharma vaccines?

That seems to violate the Constitution than anything else.

Aren't vaccine mandates usually done at the State level?
 
15th post
Good point. I am more talking about the ones required to send your kids to school.
.

Good. Thanks for clearing that up.

Since moving from WA State to South Dakota, I have met almost NO people who have taken the jab. It certainly does vary by state, and I know that Inslee would have mandated anything he could get away with.

What a huge difference. Although, I must admit that tweaking the young Covidiots was huge fun.


.
 
.

Good. Thanks for clearing that up.

Since moving from WA State to South Dakota, I have met almost NO people who have taken the jab. It certainly does vary by state, and I know that Inslee would have mandated anything he could get away with.

What a huge difference. Although, I must admit that tweaking the young Covidiots was huge fun.


.

I got two COVID shots then stopped. I still get my flu shot, and since I work in construction I'm due for a tetanus shot next year.

Hate the Tetanus shot, dead arm for a ******* week.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom