I don't think "the cameras happened to be ready and available to film this "daring rescue" which won America's heart," I think they were told to be ready because the administration wanted it filmed. The whole thing reeks of propaganda, and I'm not convinced that in choosing the subject for their propaganda coup, the administration didn't take into consideration the skin color.
I highly doubt it was coincidental the cameras were waiting and ready to film the "daring rescue" either. It 'does' reek of propaganda... I caught the end of the ABC interview last night and I believe someone even admitted that they needed to get a "good news story" out there. I dont necessarily find fault with that. From the day we gave Saddam the time limit to step down, my television channel stayed on MSNBC, CNN, and Fox 24/7. Stories of ambushes, Iraqi militants dressing up as civilians and opening fire, them strapping bombs to pregnant women, children and blowing them up, it was nice to hear a good story. I think they probably caught wind there was an American 'captive' somewhere close and, as they rallied the troops for the rescue, most likely rallied the cameras as well. I still dont see race... I see convenience. (in all honestly, I think they would have much RATHER filmed Shoshawna's groups being rescued as while they were being held captive, the Iraqis released video of the prisoners ~ Iraqis smiling over the other dead soldiers with gunshot wounds, etc. America was following the story of Shoshawnas group's capture much more closely because they actually had video feed as compared to Jessica Lynch being just another "name on a list" of American missing.)
By no means do I think Shoshawna deserves less benefits due to her skin color. I am not seeing black or white in this issue, I am seeing "American soldier" with both women. What irritates me most about this situation is the race card even being pulled.
As for the "rape" of Jessica, which was BTW termed a "sodomizing rape"
You wont see me posting in the Islam/Muslim section of this site because I admittedly know little about the faith. However, I do believe this is against their religion, correct? **When I say "this", I am referring to anal sex, not rape** (Just a question for my own benefit).
As far as the rape is concerned, after watching the story, I believe it probably did happen. I was mistaken in my earlier post where I stated it amusing that she didnt remember the rape until right before her book came out... apparently she still does not remember this incident at all (doctors confirmed it). I saw last night she had perianal trauma (could have been caused from the ambush and the accident?). I do believe she was raped; I think there is little chance that she was NOT raped (and if she was, I thank God she cant remember). This whole story just reeks of.... well, this whole story just reeks.