kwc57
BOHICA Obama
When did America become so fascist?
Its seems that though the Germans lost WWII, the fascists won it.
November 2008.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When did America become so fascist?
Its seems that though the Germans lost WWII, the fascists won it.
Same old song.
What has Hamas actually done to help the Palestinians?
Not much, but did they bomb the civilians?
Who's to blame?
There is no such thing as a "Shelter" in a War Zone. Those who live there have a limited selection of choices.... Fight, Surrender, Leave, or Be Potential Collateral Damage. Any of the first three options can be defended. The last is simply sheer stupidity.
There is if the Geneva convention is being adhered to.
So what's the point of the thread?
And who told them that?This was a school where refugees were told they would be safe.Yes. But ambulances, marked "UN", ferrying hamas thugs, are more interesting, of course.Pinpoint accuracy?
Muchly do! Bth., are UN ambulances, ferrying hamass thugs, less interesting, than the UN, bitching about its "gun-free" skools?Try to keep up.
And who told them that?This was a school where refugees were told they would be safe.Yes. But ambulances, marked "UN", ferrying hamas thugs, are more interesting, of course.Muchly do! Bth., are UN ambulances, ferrying hamass thugs, less interesting, than the UN, bitching about its "gun-free" skools?Try to keep up.
So what's the point of the thread?
A place recognized as a shelter should not have been bombed and, if no where was recognized as safe why were leaflets being dropped guiding civilians? Why couldn't they have been allowed to leave Gaza until it was over?
There is no such thing as a "Shelter" in a War Zone. Those who live there have a limited selection of choices.... Fight, Surrender, Leave, or Be Potential Collateral Damage. Any of the first three options can be defended. The last is simply sheer stupidity.
You don't stand outside during a hurricane. You shutter the windows and take shelter in the heart of the building, you leave till it passes, you go to a government shelter, but you don't stand outside with everything being blown around trying to get hit or swept away.
You don't take shelter in a war zone where there are rockets being fired. You go to an area that is not likely to be targeted. A red cross or blue UN on the roof does not mean much if the roof or courtyard is a base for rockets and weapons or the source of attacks on Israel.
If a hospital has a tank or artillery outside the front door, it is very likely the hospital will be collateral damage. Hamas is like the turtle, it hides behind the shell of "safe" place and comes out to bite then hides again. You are not getting the turtle out without breaking the shell.
Our honorable moderator inadvertently indirectly confirming that, jews are better, than arabs, of course.So what's the point of the thread?
Shell Strikes U.N. School, Killing Up To 19 Who Sought Shelter
As many as 19 people were killed when a shell struck a school run by the United Nations in Gaza, this morning.
In a message on Twitter, , the commissioner-general of UNRWA, which is responsible for the welfare of Palestinian refugees, blamed the attack on the Israeli military.
"Children, women and men killed & injured as they slept in place where they should have been safe and protected," Krähenbühl said, referring to the fact that the school was being used as a shelter. "They were not. Intolerable."
According to Krähenbühl, this is the sixth time shells have hit a UNRWA school. He "a breaking point."
NPR's Emily Harris reports that this is the second time a U.N. school has been hit and people have been killed.
Pinpoint accuracy?
![]()
So what's the point of the thread?
A place recognized as a shelter should not have been bombed and, if no where was recognized as safe why were leaflets being dropped guiding civilians? Why couldn't they have been allowed to leave Gaza until it was over?
And who bombed it?
Actually, what hamass didn't do to "help" them? It hasn't, so far, fulfilled their dreams of the "liberated palestine" and stuff, of course.Hamas is for initiating the Rockets
Same old song.
What has Hamas actually done to help the Palestinians?
What will you say when Israeli's in refugee camps are bombed and attacked by flechette rounds?
Ah! A palistanian war crime! - Israeli's in refugee camps are bombed and attacked by flechette rounds!What will you say when Israeli's in refugee camps are bombed and attacked by flechette rounds?
Oh, muchly apologizings! Me was sure it's a well-known fact, but, it's evident that, misapplication of western concepts (peace, freedom, etc.) to the arab world prevents certain folks from keeping up, so, the solution! - let's type "un ambulances hamas" in the search field of some search "engine" and enjoy. Bth., if we want more of interesting things we get:Link?And who told them that?This was a school where refugees were told they would be safe.Muchly do! Bth., are UN ambulances, ferrying hamass thugs, less interesting, than the UN, bitching about its "gun-free" skools?Try to keep up.
When you launch rockets from near and inside a "shelter" or a school, it is no longer a safe place.
It said, but unsurprising, that Hamas reduced to the level of rocket launching where children are.
And It's a serious change in thinking by the IDF. Usually, when knowing children are nearby, the place would stay untouched. But the massive loses on the Israeli side caused the IDF to change thinking.
Truly a sad reality.
Massive losses?

When you launch rockets from near and inside a "shelter" or a school, it is no longer a safe place.
It said, but unsurprising, that Hamas reduced to the level of rocket launching where children are.
And It's a serious change in thinking by the IDF. Usually, when knowing children are nearby, the place would stay untouched. But the massive loses on the Israeli side caused the IDF to change thinking.
Truly a sad reality.
Who is to blame?