'She was an adult at the time:' Hillary says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22,..

[Soupnazi630]

I didnt say I dont think. I said I didnt have to think. I read Monicas words when she says she didnt feel pressured and that the relationship was consensual. Why would she tell a lie about it decades later? Basically what you are asking me to do is disbelieve the supposed victims own words and try to make it so Clinton pressured her.

She also said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life." She didn't want to end up like Caity Mahoney. You are either extremely naïve or intellectually dishonest. I'm guessing the latter.

Whether she was starry-eyed for Clinton or not, the huge power differential and the quid pro quo make it textbook sexual harassment, by today's definition. And then there was all sorts of obstruction of justice, blatant bold face lies, and lying under oath. The fact that you would defend a criminal like him is very telling. Evidently politics is more important to you than truth and justice.

There is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

A power differential in and of itself does not make it harrassment

You obviously were either too young to remember, or you never did any research. Yes there absolutely was! She was offered a job afterwards, via Vernon Jordan...and this is a known pattern of Bill Clinton. It happened numerous times before, when he was governor of Arkansas. He would procure young women, while on the job, then afterwards either offer them a government job to keep silent… Or if they wouldn't take it, he would intimidate/threaten them into silence, or worse. It's a repeated pattern, and if you do the research going way back, it's there.

I do remember it and there is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

Someone offered her a job and others had been offered jobs in the past by the same person.

Not evidence of quid pro quo sorry.

Pattern or no pattern it proves nothing.

No evidence of harrassment exists in this case.

 

[Deno]

Is this low life BITCH seriously DERANGED or not...equating her husbands blow jobs and cigar insertions of a stogie into a young womans vagina IN THE OVAL OFFICE on a par with a tryst with a porn star as a private citizen?!!

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power

Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time

Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal

She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton says her husband's affair with Monica Lewinsky when she was a White House intern wasn't an abuse of power because the 22-year-old 'was an adult' at the time.

Speaking on CBS Sunday, Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal after he was impeached for lying about the affair.

When asked if her husband should have stepped down, Hillary responded: 'Absolutely not.'

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

VINTAGE TIME COVER The Clintons leave the WH
arm-in-arm after Bill got lewinskied. Plotting to exploit
Bill's BJ for votes, the Clintons' political apparatus never faltered.
That smirk on Hillary's face tells the story.

Hillary later went on network TV all decked out in virginal pearls,
denying everything, blaming Billy's B/J on "an invention of a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!!!

Bill later admitted to it, was impeached, and disbarred.
He also had to pay Paula Jones $850,000 dollars in an OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT!!!

And Crooked hillary is all about standing up for women….

Yet another prime example of just how Full of SHIT libtards are……..

How can they all live such lies?

 

[Soupnazi630]

I didnt say I dont think. I said I didnt have to think. I read Monicas words when she says she didnt feel pressured and that the relationship was consensual. Why would she tell a lie about it decades later? Basically what you are asking me to do is disbelieve the supposed victims own words and try to make it so Clinton pressured her.

She also said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life." She didn't want to end up like Caity Mahoney. You are either extremely naïve or intellectually dishonest. I'm guessing the latter.

Whether she was starry-eyed for Clinton or not, the huge power differential and the quid pro quo make it textbook sexual harassment, by today's definition. And then there was all sorts of obstruction of justice, blatant bold face lies, and lying under oath. The fact that you would defend a criminal like him is very telling. Evidently politics is more important to you than truth and justice.

There is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

A power differential in and of itself does not make it harrassment

You obviously were either too young to remember, or you never did any research. Yes there absolutely was! She was offered a job afterwards, via Vernon Jordan...and this is a known pattern of Bill Clinton. It happened numerous times before, when he was governor of Arkansas. He would procure young women, while on the job, then afterwards either offer them a government job to keep silent… Or if they wouldn't take it, he would intimidate/threaten them into silence, or worse. It's a repeated pattern, and if you do the research going way back, it's there.

I do remember it and there is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

It is you in denial.

Quid pro quo in harrassment cases requires more than one condition none of which were met.

A big condition is UNWELCOME sexual contact. Clearly it was welcome

Being offered a job or favor after the fact is also not evidence of quid pro quo. Only if the job or favor is contingent upon granting a sexual favor does it become quid pro quo harrassment.

There is no evidence Clinton offered Lewinsky a job or any thing else in exchange for sex.

Sorry but your claim is a massive and epic fail.
Quid pro quo - Wikipedia

 

[buttercup]

She also said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life." She didn't want to end up like Caity Mahoney. You are either extremely naïve or intellectually dishonest. I'm guessing the latter.

Whether she was starry-eyed for Clinton or not, the huge power differential and the quid pro quo make it textbook sexual harassment, by today's definition. And then there was all sorts of obstruction of justice, blatant bold face lies, and lying under oath. The fact that you would defend a criminal like him is very telling. Evidently politics is more important to you than truth and justice.

There is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

A power differential in and of itself does not make it harrassment

You obviously were either too young to remember, or you never did any research. Yes there absolutely was! She was offered a job afterwards, via Vernon Jordan...and this is a known pattern of Bill Clinton. It happened numerous times before, when he was governor of Arkansas. He would procure young women, while on the job, then afterwards either offer them a government job to keep silent… Or if they wouldn't take it, he would intimidate/threaten them into silence, or worse. It's a repeated pattern, and if you do the research going way back, it's there.

I do remember it and there is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

Someone offered her a job and others had been offered jobs in the past by the same person.

Not evidence of quid pro quo sorry.

Pattern or no pattern it proves nothing.

No evidence of harrassment exists in this case.

Just like the other guy, you are incredibly intellectually dishonest. The president has office sex with a lowly intern, and then gets her a cushy New York job offer, which is a known pattern of Clinton, according to several people who used to work for him.... and it's just a coincidence? lolololol

The fact that he – as her boss – hooked her up with a job AND the huge power differential makes it sexual harassment by definition. AND on top of that, to obstruct an investigation, continually every step of the way, and lie under oath... all those things are the behavior of someone who couldn't care less about the law, integrity, morality, truth. He should've resigned. But of course he didn't, because the Clintons have zero shame. And the crazy thing is, that whole incident was the least of his crimes. Which is why the media focused on it nonstop, as a distraction.

Stop lying to yourself, but then again… maybe this is a case of birds of a feather flock together.

 

[buttercup]

She also said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life." She didn't want to end up like Caity Mahoney. You are either extremely naïve or intellectually dishonest. I'm guessing the latter.

Whether she was starry-eyed for Clinton or not, the huge power differential and the quid pro quo make it textbook sexual harassment, by today's definition. And then there was all sorts of obstruction of justice, blatant bold face lies, and lying under oath. The fact that you would defend a criminal like him is very telling. Evidently politics is more important to you than truth and justice.

There is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

A power differential in and of itself does not make it harrassment

You obviously were either too young to remember, or you never did any research. Yes there absolutely was! She was offered a job afterwards, via Vernon Jordan...and this is a known pattern of Bill Clinton. It happened numerous times before, when he was governor of Arkansas. He would procure young women, while on the job, then afterwards either offer them a government job to keep silent… Or if they wouldn't take it, he would intimidate/threaten them into silence, or worse. It's a repeated pattern, and if you do the research going way back, it's there.

I do remember it and there is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

It is you in denial.

Quid pro quo in harrassment cases requires more than one condition none of which were met.

A big condition is UNWELCOME sexual contact. Clearly it was welcome

Being offered a job or favor after the fact is also not evidence of quid pro quo. Only if the job or favor is contingent upon granting a sexual favor does it become quid pro quo harrassment.

There is no evidence Clinton offered Lewinsky a job or any thing else in exchange for sex.

Sorry but your claim is a massive and epic fail.
Quid pro quo - Wikipedia

I never said that he offered her a job in exchange for sex. Quid pro quo simply means "something for something."

In HIS case, he buys silence, but it's actually more than that. When you do the research, you'll see that bad things happen to people who cross the Clintons. That is why Monica Lewinsky said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life."

So, he uses his power to get these women to keep quiet, and when they don't, there are consequences… complete character assassination, threats and intimidation, and in some cases, close family numbers ending up dead (See Kathleen Willey's case) or ending up dying mysteriously, and there is a long, long trail of dead bodies associated with the Clintons.

The fact that you defend him is absolutely nauseating to me.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

A power differential in and of itself does not make it harrassment

You obviously were either too young to remember, or you never did any research. Yes there absolutely was! She was offered a job afterwards, via Vernon Jordan...and this is a known pattern of Bill Clinton. It happened numerous times before, when he was governor of Arkansas. He would procure young women, while on the job, then afterwards either offer them a government job to keep silent… Or if they wouldn't take it, he would intimidate/threaten them into silence, or worse. It's a repeated pattern, and if you do the research going way back, it's there.

I do remember it and there is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

Someone offered her a job and others had been offered jobs in the past by the same person.

Not evidence of quid pro quo sorry.

Pattern or no pattern it proves nothing.

No evidence of harrassment exists in this case.

Just like the other guy, you are incredibly intellectually dishonest. The president has office sex with a lowly intern, and then gets her a cushy New York job offer, which is a known pattern of Clinton, according to several people who used to work for him.... and it's just a coincidence? lolololol

The fact that he – as her boss – hooked her up with a job AND the huge power differential makes it sexual harassment by definition. AND on top of that, to obstruct an investigation, continually every step of the way, and lie under oath... all those things are the behavior of someone who couldn't care less about the law, integrity, morality, truth. He should've resigned. But of course he didn't, because the Clintons have zero shame. And the crazy thing is, that whole incident was the least of his crimes. Which is why the media focused on it nonstop, as a distraction.

Stop lying to yourself, but then again… maybe this is a case of birds of a feather flock together.

No you are projecting

It is you being willfully dishonest and unlike you provided evidence.

There is no evidence that the job offer was contingent on sex or sexual favors.

Without said evidence you have nothing fool.

A power differential on and of itself does not define harrassment.

Go back to school boy

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

A power differential in and of itself does not make it harrassment

You obviously were either too young to remember, or you never did any research. Yes there absolutely was! She was offered a job afterwards, via Vernon Jordan...and this is a known pattern of Bill Clinton. It happened numerous times before, when he was governor of Arkansas. He would procure young women, while on the job, then afterwards either offer them a government job to keep silent… Or if they wouldn't take it, he would intimidate/threaten them into silence, or worse. It's a repeated pattern, and if you do the research going way back, it's there.

I do remember it and there is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

It is you in denial.

Quid pro quo in harrassment cases requires more than one condition none of which were met.

A big condition is UNWELCOME sexual contact. Clearly it was welcome

Being offered a job or favor after the fact is also not evidence of quid pro quo. Only if the job or favor is contingent upon granting a sexual favor does it become quid pro quo harrassment.

There is no evidence Clinton offered Lewinsky a job or any thing else in exchange for sex.

Sorry but your claim is a massive and epic fail.
Quid pro quo - Wikipedia

I never said that he offered her a job in exchange for sex. Quid pro quo simply means "something for something."

In HIS case, he buys silence, but it's actually more than that. When you do the research, you'll see that bad things happen to people who cross the Clintons. That is why Monica Lewinsky said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life."

So, he uses his power to get these women to keep quiet, and when they don't, there are consequences… complete character assassination, threats and intimidation, and in some cases, close family numbers ending up dead (See Kathleen Willey's case) or ending up dying mysteriously, and there is a long, long trail of dead bodies associated with the Clintons.

The fact that you defend him is absolutely nauseating to me.

In sexual harrassment it is absolutely contingent and agreed upon before the favors are exchanged you dumb ass

 

[buttercup]

You obviously were either too young to remember, or you never did any research. Yes there absolutely was! She was offered a job afterwards, via Vernon Jordan...and this is a known pattern of Bill Clinton. It happened numerous times before, when he was governor of Arkansas. He would procure young women, while on the job, then afterwards either offer them a government job to keep silent… Or if they wouldn't take it, he would intimidate/threaten them into silence, or worse. It's a repeated pattern, and if you do the research going way back, it's there.

I do remember it and there is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

It is you in denial.

Quid pro quo in harrassment cases requires more than one condition none of which were met.

A big condition is UNWELCOME sexual contact. Clearly it was welcome

Being offered a job or favor after the fact is also not evidence of quid pro quo. Only if the job or favor is contingent upon granting a sexual favor does it become quid pro quo harrassment.

There is no evidence Clinton offered Lewinsky a job or any thing else in exchange for sex.

Sorry but your claim is a massive and epic fail.
Quid pro quo - Wikipedia

I never said that he offered her a job in exchange for sex. Quid pro quo simply means "something for something."

In HIS case, he buys silence, but it's actually more than that. When you do the research, you'll see that bad things happen to people who cross the Clintons. That is why Monica Lewinsky said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life."

So, he uses his power to get these women to keep quiet, and when they don't, there are consequences… complete character assassination, threats and intimidation, and in some cases, close family numbers ending up dead (See Kathleen Willey's case) or ending up dying mysteriously, and there is a long, long trail of dead bodies associated with the Clintons.

The fact that you defend him is absolutely nauseating to me.

In sexual harrassment it is absolutely contingent and agreed upon before the favors are exchanged you dumb ass

I'm laughing here because you are focusing so hard on your narrow definition of sexual harassment that you're completely missing the bigger picture. He got her a job offer to buy her silence and to keep her on his side! He lied under oath! He obstructed justice! He has a long, documented history of doing this sort of thing. And you call me a dumbass when you are ignoring all of that, just so you can't can claim he doesn't fit into your narrow definition of sexual harassment? lololol Get real, or stop wasting my time. You don't care about truth. That is why you support people like the Clintons who are the worst of the worst.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I do remember it and there is no evidence of quid pro quo or harrassment.

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

It is you in denial.

Quid pro quo in harrassment cases requires more than one condition none of which were met.

A big condition is UNWELCOME sexual contact. Clearly it was welcome

Being offered a job or favor after the fact is also not evidence of quid pro quo. Only if the job or favor is contingent upon granting a sexual favor does it become quid pro quo harrassment.

There is no evidence Clinton offered Lewinsky a job or any thing else in exchange for sex.

Sorry but your claim is a massive and epic fail.
Quid pro quo - Wikipedia

I never said that he offered her a job in exchange for sex. Quid pro quo simply means "something for something."

In HIS case, he buys silence, but it's actually more than that. When you do the research, you'll see that bad things happen to people who cross the Clintons. That is why Monica Lewinsky said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life."

So, he uses his power to get these women to keep quiet, and when they don't, there are consequences… complete character assassination, threats and intimidation, and in some cases, close family numbers ending up dead (See Kathleen Willey's case) or ending up dying mysteriously, and there is a long, long trail of dead bodies associated with the Clintons.

The fact that you defend him is absolutely nauseating to me.

In sexual harrassment it is absolutely contingent and agreed upon before the favors are exchanged you dumb ass

I'm laughing here because you are focusing so hard on your narrow definition of sexual harassment that you're completely missing the bigger picture. He got her a job offer to buy her silence and to keep her on his side! He lied under oath! He obstructed justice! He has a long, documented history of doing this sort of thing. And you call me a dumbass when you are ignoring all of that, just so you can't can claim he doesn't fit into your narrow definition of sexual harassment? lololol Get real, or stop wasting my time. You don't care about truth. That is why you support people like the Clintons who are the worst of the worst.

There is no evidence he got her a job offer for silence.

I do care about truth which is why I am correcting your idiotic lies.

 

[buttercup]

There is no evidence that the job offer was contingent on sex or sexual favors.

I never made that claim, Einstein. And I'm not a boy. I would've thought my screenname would make that obvious.

 

[buttercup]

You can blatantly deny it all you want, they hooked her up with a cushy corporate job offer, which as I stated is a known pattern of Bill Clinton, going way back to his Arkansas days.

Here are some excerpts from Vernon Jordan's testimony:

Q. Now, is it true that your efforts to find a job for Ms. Lewinsky that you referenced in that meeting with Mr. Gittis--were your efforts carried out at the request of the President of the United States?

A. There is no question but that through Betty Currie, I was acting on behalf of the President to get Ms. Lewinsky a job.

Transcripts from video deposition of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. - February 5, 1999

It is you in denial.

Quid pro quo in harrassment cases requires more than one condition none of which were met.

A big condition is UNWELCOME sexual contact. Clearly it was welcome

Being offered a job or favor after the fact is also not evidence of quid pro quo. Only if the job or favor is contingent upon granting a sexual favor does it become quid pro quo harrassment.

There is no evidence Clinton offered Lewinsky a job or any thing else in exchange for sex.

Sorry but your claim is a massive and epic fail.
Quid pro quo - Wikipedia

I never said that he offered her a job in exchange for sex. Quid pro quo simply means "something for something."

In HIS case, he buys silence, but it's actually more than that. When you do the research, you'll see that bad things happen to people who cross the Clintons. That is why Monica Lewinsky said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life."

So, he uses his power to get these women to keep quiet, and when they don't, there are consequences… complete character assassination, threats and intimidation, and in some cases, close family numbers ending up dead (See Kathleen Willey's case) or ending up dying mysteriously, and there is a long, long trail of dead bodies associated with the Clintons.

The fact that you defend him is absolutely nauseating to me.

In sexual harrassment it is absolutely contingent and agreed upon before the favors are exchanged you dumb ass

I'm laughing here because you are focusing so hard on your narrow definition of sexual harassment that you're completely missing the bigger picture. He got her a job offer to buy her silence and to keep her on his side! He lied under oath! He obstructed justice! He has a long, documented history of doing this sort of thing. And you call me a dumbass when you are ignoring all of that, just so you can't can claim he doesn't fit into your narrow definition of sexual harassment? lololol Get real, or stop wasting my time. You don't care about truth. That is why you support people like the Clintons who are the worst of the worst.

There is no evidence he got her a job offer for silence.

lol. What, do you think he needs to come out and say "I got her a job to keep her quiet?" lololol You are hilarious.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no evidence that the job offer was contingent on sex or sexual favors.

I never made that claim, Einstein. And I'm not a boy. I would've thought my screenname would make that obvious.

You claimed there was quid pro quo.

Without said agreement there was none and that is fact.

Sick it up kiddoe

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is you in denial.

Quid pro quo in harrassment cases requires more than one condition none of which were met.

A big condition is UNWELCOME sexual contact. Clearly it was welcome

Being offered a job or favor after the fact is also not evidence of quid pro quo. Only if the job or favor is contingent upon granting a sexual favor does it become quid pro quo harrassment.

There is no evidence Clinton offered Lewinsky a job or any thing else in exchange for sex.

Sorry but your claim is a massive and epic fail.
Quid pro quo - Wikipedia

I never said that he offered her a job in exchange for sex. Quid pro quo simply means "something for something."

In HIS case, he buys silence, but it's actually more than that. When you do the research, you'll see that bad things happen to people who cross the Clintons. That is why Monica Lewinsky said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life."

So, he uses his power to get these women to keep quiet, and when they don't, there are consequences… complete character assassination, threats and intimidation, and in some cases, close family numbers ending up dead (See Kathleen Willey's case) or ending up dying mysteriously, and there is a long, long trail of dead bodies associated with the Clintons.

The fact that you defend him is absolutely nauseating to me.

In sexual harrassment it is absolutely contingent and agreed upon before the favors are exchanged you dumb ass

I'm laughing here because you are focusing so hard on your narrow definition of sexual harassment that you're completely missing the bigger picture. He got her a job offer to buy her silence and to keep her on his side! He lied under oath! He obstructed justice! He has a long, documented history of doing this sort of thing. And you call me a dumbass when you are ignoring all of that, just so you can't can claim he doesn't fit into your narrow definition of sexual harassment? lololol Get real, or stop wasting my time. You don't care about truth. That is why you support people like the Clintons who are the worst of the worst.

There is no evidence he got her a job offer for silence.

lol. What, do you think he needs to come out and say "I got her a job to keep her quiet?" lololol You are hilarious.

Either he or she needs to come out and say it yes.

Other wise it is absolute empty speculation.

 

[doesanyoneknowmyname]

Is this low life BITCH seriously DERANGED or not...equating her husbands blow jobs and cigar insertions of a stogie into a young womans vagina IN THE OVAL OFFICE on a par with a tryst with a porn star as a private citizen?!!

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power

Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time

Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal

She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton says her husband's affair with Monica Lewinsky when she was a White House intern wasn't an abuse of power because the 22-year-old 'was an adult' at the time.

Speaking on CBS Sunday, Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal after he was impeached for lying about the affair.

When asked if her husband should have stepped down, Hillary responded: 'Absolutely not.'

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

VINTAGE TIME COVER The Clintons leave the WH
arm-in-arm after Bill got lewinskied. Plotting to exploit
Bill's BJ for votes, the Clintons' political apparatus never faltered.
That smirk on Hillary's face tells the story.

Hillary later went on network TV all decked out in virginal pearls,
denying everything, blaming Billy's B/J on "an invention of a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!!!

Bill later admitted to it, was impeached, and disbarred.
He also had to pay Paula Jones $850,000 dollars in an OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT!!!

Melania Trump says President Trump's alleged affairs are 'not concern and focus of mine'

 

[frigidweirdo]

Is this low life BITCH seriously DERANGED or not...equating her husbands blow jobs and cigar insertions of a stogie into a young womans vagina IN THE OVAL OFFICE on a par with a tryst with a porn star as a private citizen?!!

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power

Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time

Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal

She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton says her husband's affair with Monica Lewinsky when she was a White House intern wasn't an abuse of power because the 22-year-old 'was an adult' at the time.

Speaking on CBS Sunday, Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal after he was impeached for lying about the affair.

When asked if her husband should have stepped down, Hillary responded: 'Absolutely not.'

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

VINTAGE TIME COVER The Clintons leave the WH
arm-in-arm after Bill got lewinskied. Plotting to exploit
Bill's BJ for votes, the Clintons' political apparatus never faltered.
That smirk on Hillary's face tells the story.

Hillary later went on network TV all decked out in virginal pearls,
denying everything, blaming Billy's B/J on "an invention of a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!!!

Bill later admitted to it, was impeached, and disbarred.
He also had to pay Paula Jones $850,000 dollars in an OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT!!!

Keep electing the same old politicians, same old political parties and yet you keep expecting different results.... why?

 

[The Purge]

Is this low life BITCH seriously DERANGED or not...equating her husbands blow jobs and cigar insertions of a stogie into a young womans vagina IN THE OVAL OFFICE on a par with a tryst with a porn star as a private citizen?!!

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power

Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time

Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal

She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton says her husband's affair with Monica Lewinsky when she was a White House intern wasn't an abuse of power because the 22-year-old 'was an adult' at the time.

Speaking on CBS Sunday, Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal after he was impeached for lying about the affair.

When asked if her husband should have stepped down, Hillary responded: 'Absolutely not.'

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

VINTAGE TIME COVER The Clintons leave the WH
arm-in-arm after Bill got lewinskied. Plotting to exploit
Bill's BJ for votes, the Clintons' political apparatus never faltered.
That smirk on Hillary's face tells the story.

Hillary later went on network TV all decked out in virginal pearls,
denying everything, blaming Billy's B/J on "an invention of a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!!!

Bill later admitted to it, was impeached, and disbarred.
He also had to pay Paula Jones $850,000 dollars in an OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT!!!

Keep electing the same old politicians, same old political parties and yet you keep expecting different results.... why?

Yes idiot, Trump is the same old politician....what position was he elected to before president?....You can't make this shit up, they are THIS STUPID!

 

[Rustic]

Slick Willy took advantage of the Loopy kunt....

 

[Aba Incieni]

Is this low life BITCH seriously DERANGED or not...equating her husbands blow jobs and cigar insertions of a stogie into a young womans vagina IN THE OVAL OFFICE on a par with a tryst with a porn star as a private citizen?!!

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power

Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time

Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal

She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Clinton says her husband's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, 22, was NOT an abuse of power and was right not to resign

Hillary Clinton says her husband's affair with Monica Lewinsky when she was a White House intern wasn't an abuse of power because the 22-year-old 'was an adult' at the time.

Speaking on CBS Sunday, Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal after he was impeached for lying about the affair.

When asked if her husband should have stepped down, Hillary responded: 'Absolutely not.'

Hillary Clinton has denied that her husband Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power Ex-Secretary of State said on Sunday that Lewinsky 'was an adult' at the time Hillary also said she believed Bill was right not to resign as President in the wake of the scandal She went on to question where the investigation was into President Trump's allegations of sexual misconduct

Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

VINTAGE TIME COVER The Clintons leave the WH
arm-in-arm after Bill got lewinskied. Plotting to exploit
Bill's BJ for votes, the Clintons' political apparatus never faltered.
That smirk on Hillary's face tells the story.

Hillary later went on network TV all decked out in virginal pearls,
denying everything, blaming Billy's B/J on "an invention of a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!!!

Bill later admitted to it, was impeached, and disbarred.
He also had to pay Paula Jones $850,000 dollars in an OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT!!!

Melania Trump says President Trump's alleged affairs are 'not concern and focus of mine'

Has Melania made a 25 year political career out of pretending to represent women?

Did she say she wasn't a stand by your man kinda woman?

lol it is any wonder the DNC wants Hillary to stfu?

 

[Asclepias]

I didnt say I dont think. I said I didnt have to think. I read Monicas words when she says she didnt feel pressured and that the relationship was consensual. Why would she tell a lie about it decades later? Basically what you are asking me to do is disbelieve the supposed victims own words and try to make it so Clinton pressured her.

She also said "I wouldn't cross these people for fear of my life." She didn't want to end up like Caity Mahoney. You are either extremely naïve or intellectually dishonest. I'm guessing the latter.

Whether she was starry-eyed for Clinton or not, the huge power differential and the quid pro quo make it textbook sexual harassment, by today's definition. And then there was all sorts of obstruction of justice, blatant bold face lies, and lying under oath. The fact that you would defend a criminal like him is very telling. Evidently politics is more important to you than truth and justice.

xxxxxxxxxxxx It cant be sexual harassment. She point blank said it was consensual and she didnt feel pressured. Are you not smart enough to figure out that she wanted the relationship so there is no way she was pressured by him to have sex? All this other stuff you are talking about has zilch to do with the point.

sex·u·al ha·rass·ment
noun
noun: sexual harassment

1. harassment (typically of a woman) in a workplace, or other professional or social situation, involving the making of unwanted sexual advances or obscene remarks.

 

[Linkiloo]

Due to the power differential, she wasn't just an adult and didn't seduce him. How embarassing for a betrayed woman to have to find excuses for her cheating hubbie.

There is no such thing as a power differential which removes adult consent.

She can still seduce him.

Nonsense and of course workplace power differnetials effect whether someone has to say yes and the fact that they must do so even if they do not want to. Of course an adult can consent but due to the power differential the "consent" must be considered more carefully. Same applies in other power differentials such as with a priest or professor. An old man was seduced....I am laughing hysterically.