The further you pull back, the worse the picture gets for the GOP, diversity-wise.
This is the truth which the parroting rubes fear to admit to themselves.
Why? Only a bigot would be afraid of the truth.
A realist accepts the facts. And then the discussion can move forward.
"GOP: Pasty white and non-inclusive. Good or bad thing?"
The GOP may be pasty white. The question is why.
Iowa shows it is NOT because the pasty whites reject brown or black people.

You are still in delusion why our GOP has a problem. Yes, it is about people like you.
A casino magnate billionaire. Proof of diversity. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
One can actually SMELL the flop sweat.
Actually yes.
Diversity of ideas and backgrounds.
That you consider him primarily by his skin color reflects your world view, not ours.
The GOP establishment certainly does NOT look at him and see one of them.
But the dumb saps look at him and see one of them. Even though he's always been a Democrat who is pro-choice, pro-big government, pro taxing the rich, a good friend of the Clintons.
So when the same rubes say Trump is evidence of diversity, is anyone really surprised at their unabated stupidity and gullibility?
Nope. Not at all.
I long ago learned about this phenomenon of willing self-delusion with the bleevers in psychics, mediums, and other hucksters.
You people WANT to be lied to.
Your dislike of Trump is off topic.
Trump is not one of the GOP party establishment. He is a populist and a nationalist.
He is certainly shaking things up with a very different perspective and polices and methods.
You look at him and judge him by his skin color as just another "pasty white guy".
Iowa shows "people like me" have no problem with voting for minorities.
This greatly undermines the Myth that the GOP is the party of "old white racists".
Succinct and to the point, very well said...yet something Liberals do not want to hear and will do their best to distract from.
Lets get a few things correct,
1. Women are not a minority, they are the majority. It is just another lefty falsehood to make another victim.
2. The reason there are more minorities in congress on the Democratic side is.......the Democrats control all the cities where most minorities live, so of course, they would and should have more minorities in office. Hell, in most big cities, the GOP doesn't even run for office!
3. The OP is correct in this thread, period. The Democrats didn't want Obama in 08, they wanted Hillary. The voters put Mr. Obama in. They didn't want a repeat, so if the DNC had its way, Hillary would be running against Hillary for the Democratic nomination, and the funny thing is, if that were to happen, she might still lose, lol.
4. Hispanic is NOT a real minority group. Puerto Ricans dislike Cubans, and both of them dislike Mexicans. It is the height of arrogance to lump them all together as a group!
6. Jake wants to tell you that the Democrat nominee will carry 75% of their new phony group the Hispanics. He may be correct! But here is a piece of that group they will NOT carry even 30% of, and that is the Cuban community; not this time. They are PISSED with the Democrats for making nice with the Castro brothers, and because of that, Florida will go GOP this time by 5 to 7 points. I am in Florida as I type this, and it cemented what I already knew. Depending upon who the GOP nominate, Florida may even lose its battleground status this election.
Let me say, that the way Democrats do business is------> create a group, then pander to it. They are attempting to do this today with their latest group, the Hispanics. They are willing to throw Americans under the bus to do this. They have thrown African Americans under the bus to do it also. Why? Because the Hispanic community is the fastest growing of any, and they need those votes. They break the country's laws to do it, because they know if they can give them the ability to vote, we will become basically socialist. If they could legally vote now, Bernie would be our next President.