Graham: the agreement had some “troubling aspects” and that he wants Vice President JD Vance and the architects of deal “coming forward to Congress"

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
44,272
Reaction score
43,296
Points
3,605
Look, I do not know what the right answer is, I do not want Iran to have nukes or to remain a tyrant to their citizens.

However, Graham is the last person Trump should listen to and may have happily sabotaged Trumps entire legacy and America First policies.

It is simple, whoever advised Trump to go war without a thorough plan or sober assessment gave bad advice. Simple. In the air, Israel alone could probably have handled Iran with their air force (with U.S intel), both countries made it a cake walk. However, the reality was, as I said about the 12 day war as well in terms of being 100% certain nukes were gone; it was going to require a ground invasion. This would be extremely unpopular and would not be a certain victory without well armed, coordinated resistance.

Thus, even if those who advised him were correct the last 15 times, being wrong this time with this magnitude an excursion before the mid-terms was a great risk indeed with no room for error. That person should walk the plank in some form and be listened to less.

It is interesting that Graham wants to question Vance (Graham is a Chicken Hawk and despises Vance) on the peace agreement. Yet, had no issue with what started the war to begin with? He is purposely trying to harm Vance as he knows he is the highest chance of winning in 2028 and he would rather Newsom than MAGA as he desperately wanted the Neo-Cons back in the saddle.



Some of the most hawkish voices in President Trump’s ear about the war in Iran aren’t pleased with some of the details of the cease-fire deal. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said Wednesday morning that the agreement had some “troubling aspects” and that he wants Vice President JD Vance and the architects of the deal “coming forward to Congress and explaining how a negotiated deal meets our national security objectives in Iran.”

Mark Levin, a conservative talk-show host whose commentary on the Iran war has been followed closely by the president, was more blunt about his dissatisfaction with the cease-fire agreement. “These 10 points are an absolute disaster,” Levin posted Wednesday.




When they were interviewing him on Hannity I believe on the night Trump lost in 2020 you could tell he was elated that he survived a challenge by a well funded opponent. Was he also excited that Trump lost?

Lindsey Graham says there should be congressional review of any deal with Iran​

 
Graham looking for praise from the anti-American media.

I'm not sure the point of congressional review of a deal with Iran.

Not that sure the point of a deal with Iran, to be completely accurate.

The deal is not what will make the world safer, it is Trump's assurance that if the deal is violated, he will go right back to bombs targeted at Iran's leadership.

No Democrats, and damn few Republicans, will be able to credibly make that promise once Trump is gone.
 
What has Canada done to stop the terrorism Iran has sponsored?
 
Graham looking for praise from the anti-American media.

I'm not sure the point of congressional review of a deal with Iran.

Not that sure the point of a deal with Iran, to be completely accurate.

The deal is not what will make the world safer, it is Trump's assurance that if the deal is violated, he will go right back to bombs targeted at Iran's leadership.

No Democrats, and damn few Republicans, will be able to credibly make that promise once Trump is gone.
We lost Americans
We pay over $4 for gas
Americans are injured

They get to keep their uranium
They also still keep defacto control of the Strait

High prices to pay to distract from the Epstein files.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom