Sexuality

[Sky Dancer]

yes it is... along with the reality at times too.

And you straight people think we're weird.

you are weird...not that there is anything wrong with that

Yes, I am. I'm bent.

 

[Sky Dancer]

yes i understand that point.

However this is a political forum... here to discuss politics. If i want to talk sex or sexuality...i go to other forums.

Again... if a site cannot show nipples... then sexual issues and topics are off the table for the most part.

Think no nipples=up tight.

Are you trying to shut down the thread?

No.. not at all. Your OP asked why there is no sexuality forum within the site. I am telling you why.

Do i think there should be one. Yes and No. Yes because sex and sexuality are parts of life. No because this is a political forum and for the most part, IMO, it would be used by trolls to get their rocks off... not so much to discuss sexual issues.

So far, it doesn't appear that you fear is justified. I don't see any trolls here. It's a great topic.

 

[syrenn]

Very common het male fantasy.

yes it is... along with the reality at times too.

And you straight people think we're weird.

LOL...

Some of us are just used to advanced sex and sexuality i guess


So why would that version of a threesome be weird? One man, two women... with the women playing with each other?

Is it the man in the mix that is weird? The two women playing that is weird.? Or just three people together being weird?

 

[Sky Dancer]

yes it is... along with the reality at times too.

And you straight people think we're weird.

LOL...

Some of us are just used to advanced sex and sexuality i guess


So why would that version of a threesome be weird? One man, two women... with the women playing with each other?

Is it the man in the mix that is weird? The two women playing that is weird.? Or just three people together being weird?

Men in the mix is weird to me. Three women is not.

 

[NGSamson]

You and two girls right? In this fantasy do the two girls play?

Yes.

how about you another man and a girl?

or you, another man and one girl where you boys play?

"What ever you do, you must never cross the streams. It would be bad."

Egon Spangler, Ghost Busters.

 

[Sky Dancer]

I don't know if anyone will answer my question, but I am curious about it. If you read or watch a lovemaking scene that features a combination of partners different from your own orientation is it appealing to you?

Consider, that as a lesbian, most lovemaking scenes in books and movies are between a man and woman. I'm not unmoved.

 

[syrenn]

Yes.

how about you another man and a girl?

or you, another man and one girl where you boys play?

I couldn't mess with another guy but a threesome just focusing on the girl is a possibility.

Which is my point. It is becoming more socially acceptable for girls to play with each other over boys.

However...in that situation.. i would not want the men playing with each other either...

 

[Sky Dancer]

how about you another man and a girl?

or you, another man and one girl where you boys play?

I couldn't mess with another guy but a threesome just focusing on the girl is a possibility.

Which is my point. It is becoming more socially acceptable for girls to play with each other over boys.

However...in that situation.. i would not want the men playing with each other either...

Right. You want them both attending to you.

 

[syrenn]

Let me ask you all a question. Does seeing two women or two men having sex in a movie turn you on?

I find some heterosexual love scenes appealing, but it doesn't mean I want to have sex with a man.

I just watched a movie this weekend, Monsieur Hire'. It's about a voyeur and an exhibitionist. There was one very hot scene that appealed to both my wife and I.

male on male...is a big ZERO ... it does not turn me one one bit.
female on female is neutral ... In porn it is in there for the male fantasy of two women... just not my thing.

 

[Sky Dancer]

Let me ask you all a question. Does seeing two women or two men having sex in a movie turn you on?

I find some heterosexual love scenes appealing, but it doesn't mean I want to have sex with a man.

I just watched a movie this weekend, Monsieur Hire'. It's about a voyeur and an exhibitionist. There was one very hot scene that appealed to both my wife and I.

male on male...is a big ZERO ... it does not turn me one one bit.
female on female is neutral ... In porn it is in there for the male fantasy of two women... just not my thing.

What I'm saying is some love making scenes between a man and a woman are erotic to me, but it doesn't mean I want to have sex with a man.

I'm stuck with having the predominant sexual imagery in fiction be heterosexual.

 

[syrenn]

Are you trying to shut down the thread?

No.. not at all. Your OP asked why there is no sexuality forum within the site. I am telling you why.

Do i think there should be one. Yes and No. Yes because sex and sexuality are parts of life. No because this is a political forum and for the most part, IMO, it would be used by trolls to get their rocks off... not so much to discuss sexual issues.

So far, it doesn't appear that you fear is justified. I don't see any trolls here. It's a great topic.

This is one thread. At this point there are 68 posts and 233 views. Given time and from my experience of this forum... that is the way it would go.

I did not say it was not a great topic.

 

[Sky Dancer]

No.. not at all. Your OP asked why there is no sexuality forum within the site. I am telling you why.

Do i think there should be one. Yes and No. Yes because sex and sexuality are parts of life. No because this is a political forum and for the most part, IMO, it would be used by trolls to get their rocks off... not so much to discuss sexual issues.

So far, it doesn't appear that you fear is justified. I don't see any trolls here. It's a great topic.

This is one thread. At this point there are 68 posts and 233 views. Given time and from my experience of this forum... that is the way it would go.

I did not say it was not a great topic.

You may be right. I've certainly seen plenty of threads I've started that I thought were great topics ruined.

 

[High_Gravity]

how about you another man and a girl?

or you, another man and one girl where you boys play?

I couldn't mess with another guy but a threesome just focusing on the girl is a possibility.

Dude. I didn't know you were GAY!






















{insert obligatory j/k here}

You don't have to be gay to tag team a lady.

 

[syrenn]

And you straight people think we're weird.

LOL...

Some of us are just used to advanced sex and sexuality i guess


So why would that version of a threesome be weird? One man, two women... with the women playing with each other?

Is it the man in the mix that is weird? The two women playing that is weird.? Or just three people together being weird?

Men in the mix is weird to me. Three women is not.

So weird is not in the group sex thing... just the man. From a lesbian standpoint.. that is normal and understandable.

However some would consider all of it weird... hetro or not.

 

[Sky Dancer]

I couldn't mess with another guy but a threesome just focusing on the girl is a possibility.

Dude. I didn't know you were GAY!






















{insert obligatory j/k here}

You don't have to be gay to tag team a lady.

Ugh. Is that what you call it? Sounds more like gang rape to me.

 

[High_Gravity]

how about you another man and a girl?

or you, another man and one girl where you boys play?

I couldn't mess with another guy but a threesome just focusing on the girl is a possibility.

Which is my point. It is becoming more socially acceptable for girls to play with each other over boys.

However...in that situation.. i would not want the men playing with each other either...

Right, we would be busy tending to your needs.

 

[High_Gravity]

Dude. I didn't know you were GAY!






















{insert obligatory j/k here}

You don't have to be gay to tag team a lady.

Ugh. Is that what you call it? Sounds more like gang rape to me.

Please, its not rape.

 

[NGSamson]

Let me ask you all a question. Does seeing two women or two men having sex in a movie turn you on?

I find some heterosexual love scenes appealing, but it doesn't mean I want to have sex with a man.

I just watched a movie this weekend, Monsieur Hire'. It's about a voyeur and an exhibitionist. There was one very hot scene that appealed to both my wife and I.

male on male...is a big ZERO ... it does not turn me one one bit.
female on female is neutral ... In porn it is in there for the male fantasy of two women... just not my thing.

It go's to the Female body. When you look at it, it looks like it was designed to be admired. Nice curves, no abrupt endings, just good design. Dudes were designed to just "get it done". Nothing about a dude body makes me want to look.

 

[Sky Dancer]

LOL...

Some of us are just used to advanced sex and sexuality i guess


So why would that version of a threesome be weird? One man, two women... with the women playing with each other?

Is it the man in the mix that is weird? The two women playing that is weird.? Or just three people together being weird?

Men in the mix is weird to me. Three women is not.

So weird is not in the group sex thing... just the man. From a lesbian standpoint.. that is normal and understandable.

However some would consider all of it weird... hetro or not.

Of course. Some consider sex without procreation weird. Some consider anything other than the missionary position weird.

 

[syrenn]

I couldn't mess with another guy but a threesome just focusing on the girl is a possibility.

Which is my point. It is becoming more socially acceptable for girls to play with each other over boys.

However...in that situation.. i would not want the men playing with each other either...

Right. You want them both attending to you.

Of course! lol.