Senile John McCain demands 'act of war' against Russia

[gipper]

My PayPal account had an attempted hacking from what PayPal Security said was Indonesia. Should we not bomb Indonesia?

You know McCain didn't demand an act of war in retaliation......right?

Obama did when he imposed economic sanctions.

 

[Polk]

McCain has ended up being wrong on nearly every foreign policy issue.

I'm not defending McCain's positions (there have been a lot over the years I've disagree with), but would you care to give specific examples?

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

 

[SassyIrishLass]

McCain has ended up being wrong on nearly every foreign policy issue.

I'm not defending McCain's positions (there have been a lot over the years I've disagree with), but would you care to give specific examples?

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

 

[Polk]

McCain has ended up being wrong on nearly every foreign policy issue.

I'm not defending McCain's positions (there have been a lot over the years I've disagree with), but would you care to give specific examples?

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

McCain has ended up being wrong on nearly every foreign policy issue.

I'm not defending McCain's positions (there have been a lot over the years I've disagree with), but would you care to give specific examples?

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

 

[Polk]

I'm not defending McCain's positions (there have been a lot over the years I've disagree with), but would you care to give specific examples?

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

As I said, you can discount the evidence, but that's different from saying the evidence doesn't exist.

No one seriously argued "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video"

And I ask once again. If the Russians were not Assange's source, who was?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Think loons....think

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

No one seriously argued "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video"

You're dismissed...you can't possibly be trying to sell that bullshit. I distinctly remember Susan Rice on a Sunday morning talk show selling that crap

 

[gipper]

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

As I said, you can discount the evidence, but that's different from saying the evidence doesn't exist.

No one seriously argued "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video"

And I ask once again. If the Russians were not Assange's source, who was?

...and yet Dear Leader and his minions claimed repeatedly that Benghazi was about a Youtube video.

They lied. So why would anyone believe them ever again?

 

[Tehon]

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

As I said, you can discount the evidence, but that's different from saying the evidence doesn't exist.

No one seriously argued "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video"

And I ask once again. If the Russians were not Assange's source, who was?

The evidence doesn't exist.

And we don't know Assange's source.

 

[Polk]

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

No one seriously argued "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video"

You're dismissed...you can't possibly be trying to sell that bullshit. I distinctly remember Susan Rice on a Sunday morning talk show selling that crap

No one seriously believed "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video." Rice made a knowingly false statement on a talk show because those were the intelligence community's talking points at the time. An accurate assessment at that point would have required exposing CIA assets in the region.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

No one seriously argued "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video"

You're dismissed...you can't possibly be trying to sell that bullshit. I distinctly remember Susan Rice on a Sunday morning talk show selling that crap

No one seriously believed "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video." Rice made a knowingly false statement on a talk show because those were the intelligence community's talking points at the time. An accurate assessment at that point would have required exposing CIA assets in the region.

Dance away but nobody is going to buy it....trust me on this one

 

[rightwinger]

Lucky for Putin, he has bought himself a President of the U.S.

Rather than an ally, he has installed a puppet as leader of the free world

There goes a consumer of fake news.

You morons elected a Russian puppet

 

[Polk]

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Show the evidence....it seems there is an issue with that. Obama and Co have lied since Day 1...I'm not apt to start believing them now w/o proof

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

As I said, you can discount the evidence, but that's different from saying the evidence doesn't exist.

No one seriously argued "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video"

And I ask once again. If the Russians were not Assange's source, who was?

The evidence doesn't exist.

And we don't know Assange's source.

We have evidence that the Russians were Assange's source and we know that Assange is lying about who his source is. He got the information from a "Romanian" hacker that doesn't speak Romanian and claims to not speak Russia, but uses a Russian-language VPN...

 

[gipper]

Lucky for Putin, he has bought himself a President of the U.S.

Rather than an ally, he has installed a puppet as leader of the free world

There goes a consumer of fake news.

You morons elected a Russian puppet

Do you really think Trump is another FDR?

 

[initforme]

While Trump is legitimately the prez, is it being accepted by Americans that Russia was meddling???? I don't get it. All of a sudden we all think Putin is a good man and is not corrupt, etc?

 

[rightwinger]

McCain has ended up being wrong on nearly every foreign policy issue.

I'm not defending McCain's positions (there have been a lot over the years I've disagree with), but would you care to give specific examples?

The OP is one glaring example. To date there is no evidence Russia hacked anything and he wants to go to war over it? Nope

Except that:
1. There is a litany of evidence that Russia was behind the hack. You can discount that evidence, but that's not the same as it not existing.
2. He hasn't called for "going to war."

Russia engaged in cyber war against the U.S.

Trump is already surrendering

 

[whitehall]

The timing is interesting. When almost the entire world was focused on the Obama administration's influence in the U.N. sanctions against Israel, senators McCain and Graham sought on-air time to rant about the non issue of "Russian hacking". Is it possible that McCain and Graham are deliberately trying to protect the Obama administration by deflecting attention from the Israel situation? As chairman of the senate Armed Services committee and a member of the senate Homeland Security committee McCain must have known about the alleged Russian hacking years ago if it was a fact. Why did he wait until now to call for sanctions against Russia? Was he disappointed that Trump won the election? I smell a rat.

 

[Polk]

You could go read any of the literally hundreds of article citing CIA and FBI sources on Russian involvement.

I would also ask where you think Assange got the files from.

I don't believe Russia hacked a damn thing. Much like I never believed Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video.

Obama is playing his sheep like a fiddle....you a sheep?

No one seriously argued "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video"

You're dismissed...you can't possibly be trying to sell that bullshit. I distinctly remember Susan Rice on a Sunday morning talk show selling that crap

No one seriously believed "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video." Rice made a knowingly false statement on a talk show because those were the intelligence community's talking points at the time. An accurate assessment at that point would have required exposing CIA assets in the region.

Dance away but nobody is going to buy it....trust me on this one

The great thing about the truth is that it doesn't matter if you buy it, it's still the truth.

CIA talking points for Susan Rice called Benghazi attack "spontaneously inspired" by protests - CBS News
Petraeus Says U.S. Tried to Avoid Tipping Off Terrorists

 

[rightwinger]

Lucky for Putin, he has bought himself a President of the U.S.

Rather than an ally, he has installed a puppet as leader of the free world

There goes a consumer of fake news.

You morons elected a Russian puppet

Do you really think Trump is another FDR?

Hardly

FDR used Russians to kill Nazis
Trump used Russians to get elected