Senator Tim Scott... right on target!!! What have we got after $25 trillion spent on the War on Poverty???

healthmyths

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2011
28,423
10,009
900
"What was hard to survive was Johnson’s Great Society, where they decided to put money — where they decided to take the Black father out of the household to get a check in the mail. And you can now measure that in unemployment and crime and devastation.
Proof?
About 67 percent of black children are born into a single parent household.
Before the great society formation....
A study of 1880 family structures in Philadelphia, showed that three-quarters of black families were nuclear families, composed of two parents and children.[14] Data from U.S. Census reports reveal that between 1880 and 1960, married households consisting of two-parent homes were the most widespread form of African-American family structures

Nationally, about $25 trillion (adjusted for inflation) have been spent to combat poverty since 1964 when President Lyndon B. Johnson's War on Poverty engendered the Great Society.May

TimScottGreatsociety.png
 
What have we gotten?

People being able to house and feed their families, healthcare, Educational grants, small business loans, urban enterprise zones…..

What have we gotten out of the tens of trillions we have spent on the military other than wars half way around the world ?

I would rather spend tax dollars on helping Americans than nation building around the world
 
Not really…..helping those who need help
What have Republicans done for those in poverty other than build more prisons and send their jobs overseas?
So what have democrats done? Look at CA and NYC. AOC chased Amazon's HQ2 to VA keeping a blighted area instead of having a new modern complex and 75,000 new well paying jobs, plus about $30b a year in NY state taxes.
 
What have we gotten?

People being able to house and feed their families, healthcare, Educational grants, small business loans, urban enterprise zones…..

What have we gotten out of the tens of trillions we have spent on the military other than wars half way around the world ?

I would rather spend tax dollars on helping Americans than nation building around the world
And we live off of foreign slaves to achieve all of this. The real inconvenient truth.
 
So what have democrats done? Look at CA and NYC. AOC chased Amazon's HQ2 to VA keeping a blighted area instead of having a new modern complex and 75,000 new well paying jobs, plus about $30b a year in NY state taxes.

Guess what?

AOC is a Congress member in DC
She has no say in local business investments
 
AOC led the opposition, and celebrated HQ2's departure to VA. She prefers squalor and blight.
AOC acted like any other citizen in opposing $2.8 billion in tax breaks for the wealthiest corporation in the world.

She had no vote in the ultimate decision
 
The systemic disincentive to maintain families as had always been one society's principal functions must be re-examined and modified.
 
What have we gotten?

People being able to house and feed their families, healthcare, Educational grants, small business loans, urban enterprise zones…..

What have we gotten out of the tens of trillions we have spent on the military other than wars half way around the world ?

I would rather spend tax dollars on helping Americans than nation building around the world

And after 60 years the percentage of people in "poverty" in the United States is the same as it was back then.

What we're doing is not working.
 
And after 60 years the percentage of people in "poverty" in the United States is the same as it was back then.

What we're doing is not working.
60 years ago, people living in urban areas could get jobs where they could start in a low skill position and advance.
Those jobs left the cities and the people behind.

Do you oppose providing food, housing and medical care for those living in poverty?
 
60 years ago, people living in urban areas could get jobs where they could start in a low skill position and advance.
Those jobs left the cities and the people behind.
So isn't that what we should be fixing?

Do you oppose providing food, housing and medical care for those living in poverty?
Not for all, but for most, yes, because the vast majority of people end up where they are in life based on their own decisions.
 
"What was hard to survive was Johnson’s Great Society, where they decided to put money — where they decided to take the Black father out of the household to get a check in the mail. And you can now measure that in unemployment and crime and devastation.
Proof?
About 67 percent of black children are born into a single parent household.
Before the great society formation....
A study of 1880 family structures in Philadelphia, showed that three-quarters of black families were nuclear families, composed of two parents and children.[14] Data from U.S. Census reports reveal that between 1880 and 1960, married households consisting of two-parent homes were the most widespread form of African-American family structures

Nationally, about $25 trillion (adjusted for inflation) have been spent to combat poverty since 1964 when President Lyndon B. Johnson's War on Poverty engendered the Great Society.May

View attachment 838108
What facts do you disagree with?
More importantly I truly want to know what FACTS you have that I put up, i.e.
a) 67% of black children today are born in single parent household?
b) $25 trillion has been spent to combat poverty since the "Great Society" started.
c) A study of 1880 family structures in Philadelphia, showed that three-quarters of black families were nuclear families, composed of two parents and children

You disagree with the above FACTS...where is your refutation?
 
So isn't that what we should be fixing?
Absolutely
Why aren’t Republicans bringing good jobs in those communities? They would vote Republican forever.

Instead they won’t even enter urban communities
 

Forum List

Back
Top