Senator Josh Hawley states the obvious. DISTRICT judges cannot make NATIONAL rulings.

So then, a district judge should not be ruling on a national issue such as abortion or civil rights.

Abortion is a state issue
 
What's the point of having district judges if district judges can make national rulings? Just do away what th all the district judges and just have the Supreme Court.
That’s idiotic. Nine judges could never handle all the cases.
 
:mad:


1742951449543.webp
 
So then, a district judge should not be ruling on a national issue such as abortion or civil rights.
Well, I'm not a lawyer, but maybe a judge should only be ruling on that district, not the nation. Furthermore it should be a national issue or an issue in the purview of the Executive Branch.
They can't choose to repeal a federal law and make the use of poison legal without politicians passing something to that effect.

Also, there is the conflict of interest with his family I believe in which they are involved in legal assistance for illegals, that might pose a reason for him to recuse, I dont know.

You can smoke a plant in California but you can't do that in every state.
 
Biden didn't ignore the SCOTUS ruling about using the HEROS Act to lower Student Loan Debt.

He complied with the order.

The court did not say that other means couldn't be used, only that the means he was using was beyond scope of authority.

WW
Bullshit. He tried the same thing with a different statute that had the same infirmaries
 
89 federal district courts in the 50 states and their rulings should only apply in that district. That should be obvious. Can a city judge in columbus OH tell indianapolis what to do?
You don't understand how this works at all:

Key Errors in Your Statement:


1️⃣ There Are Not 89 Federal District Courts

There are 94 U.S. District Courts covering all 50 states + territories (not 89).
  • Every state has at least one, but larger states have multiple (e.g., California has 4, Washington has 2).

2️⃣ Federal District Court Rulings Aren’t Limited to Their Physical District
  • A U.S. District Court ruling can set national precedent if it involves federal law and is upheld on appeal.
  • Some district court rulings apply nationwide because they involve federal agencies or constitutional issues, affecting the entire country.

3️⃣ Comparing a Federal District Judge to a City Judge Makes No Sense
  • A city judge in Columbus, OH enforces local municipal law—they have zero jurisdiction over Indianapolis, IN.
  • A federal district judge enforces federal law, which applies everywhere in the U.S.
  • A federal judge can issue a nationwide injunction if a federal agency or national law is involved (e.g., immigration policy, civil rights, or environmental law).

Why Some Federal District Court Rulings Apply Nationwide

🔹 When a federal district court issues an injunction, it often applies only within that district—but there are exceptions:
✔ If a case challenges a federal law or policy, the ruling may apply nationwide (e.g., immigration bans, Title VII discrimination laws).
✔ If the defendant is a federal agency, a nationwide injunction may be necessary (e.g., blocking a rule from the Department of Education or EPA).
✔ If a case involves constitutional rights, courts may strike down a law or policy nationwide (e.g., same-sex marriage bans, civil rights protections).

Example of a Nationwide Ruling by a District Court

📍 Judge Derrick Watson (District of Hawaii) → Issued an injunction blocking Trump’s travel ban because it affected all states, not just Hawaii.
📍 Judge James Robart (Western District of Washington) → Blocked another Trump travel ban, applying nationwide because it involved federal agencies (DHS & ICE).

These rulings were challenged and reviewed by higher courts, but the idea that a district judge can’t issue rulings affecting the whole country is completely incorrect.




Final Takeaway:


This person doesn’t understand the difference between a local city judge and a federal judge, nor do they understand how federal law works. Their logic doesn’t hold up, because federal judges interpret and enforce federal law—which, by definition, applies nationwide.
 
1742959805542.webp

Explanation of the U.S. Court System


Federal Court System (Left Side)


  • U.S. Supreme CourtHighest court, hears appeals from circuit courts & state supreme courts.
  • U.S. Courts of Appeals (Circuit Courts)13 appellate courts that review cases from U.S. District Courts.
  • U.S. District Courts94 trial courts where federal cases begin (civil & criminal).
  • U.S. Bankruptcy Courts → Handle bankruptcy cases (attached to district courts).

State Court System (Right Side)


  • State Supreme CourtHighest court in the state.
  • State Courts of Appeal → Review cases from lower state courts.
  • State Trial Courts → Called Superior Courts, District Courts, or Circuit Courts, depending on the state.
  • Local/Municipal Courts → Handle small claims, traffic, and minor criminal offenses.

Key Takeaways


✅ Federal courts handle federal law cases, state disputes, and constitutional issues.
✅ State courts handle most legal matters, including criminal cases, family law, and contracts.
✅ Appeals from state supreme courts can go to the U.S. Supreme Court if federal law is involved.
 
View attachment 1093597

Explanation of the U.S. Court System


Federal Court System (Left Side)


  • U.S. Supreme CourtHighest court, hears appeals from circuit courts & state supreme courts.
  • U.S. Courts of Appeals (Circuit Courts)13 appellate courts that review cases from U.S. District Courts.
  • U.S. District Courts94 trial courts where federal cases begin (civil & criminal).
  • U.S. Bankruptcy Courts → Handle bankruptcy cases (attached to district courts).

State Court System (Right Side)


  • State Supreme CourtHighest court in the state.
  • State Courts of Appeal → Review cases from lower state courts.
  • State Trial Courts → Called Superior Courts, District Courts, or Circuit Courts, depending on the state.
  • Local/Municipal Courts → Handle small claims, traffic, and minor criminal offenses.

Key Takeaways


✅ Federal courts handle federal law cases, state disputes, and constitutional issues.
✅ State courts handle most legal matters, including criminal cases, family law, and contracts.
✅ Appeals from state supreme courts can go to the U.S. Supreme Court if federal law is involved.
Please link to your law degree.
 
Totally irrelevant discussion.

The Commander in Chief decides what national security is.

End of story.
 
His ruling should only apply in that district. THINK
There is no such thing as district law. It's federal law or state law etc. Federal law applies federally, to the whole nation. Federal law does not change by where you are standing with your feet on the ground.... Or by where the federal courthouse is positioned on a map.

It's just dumber than dumb to take the position that Federal Law is different in every district.....sheesh!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom