You are completely disingenuous. We had this discussion earlier in the thread and I provided cites to numerous sources.
* There was the May 2006 statement by Cheney's spokesperson to the Chicago Tribune.
*There were the two letters from the National Archives to both Cheney and Alberto Gonzalez detailing the disagreement between the parties, and restating the OVP's position that it was an an executive office. [I actually provided you with a link to pdfs of the actual documents]
Cheney did eventually fall back on the claim that his office was an agency, but only in late June after the media picked up the story. And this 1) doesn't negate an earlier claim that his office is not an executive office; and 2) is completely and utterly baseless in light of the wording of the executive order [to which, I also provided a link].
For your information, Cheney has even pretty much abandoned the claim that he is not an agency under the order, and is saying that the intent of the order was always to include his office within that of the Office of the President, whether the order actually says this or not.
This is the second or third time in the last few days where I have seen you continue to make claims or deny the claims of others, irrespective of what sources they provide you, or what sources you appear unable to provide. It is very frustrating, and robs you of the opportunity to be taken seriously. I hope that you will stop.