Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Show me all of his work between 1951 and 1959, dope. That's when he was blacklisted.
With growing popularity and many excellent reviews, Mostel’s career nonetheless came to a complete halt during the 1950s. Seeing many of his show business friends blacklisted and forced to name names of supposed Communists, it came as no surprise to him that he was named, too. On January 29, 1952, Martin Berkeley identified him to the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) as having been a member of the Communist party (Berkeley had named 160 people in all—more than any other witness). This was enough to stifle Mostel's career even before he was subpoenaed to appear before HUAC, which happened on August 14, 1955.
He lost 8 years of work at a time when he was very popular. By the 1960s and 1970s, America had realized what a fool McCarthy was, and he was able to work again.
It's way too easy to show you for the fool that you are.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Show me that he was on food stamps.
You don't know how he was doing, do you?
Doesn't seem to have missed any meals.
And you've stopped claiming that Senator McCarthy had anything to do with Mr. Mostel, haven't you...so, who's the dope?
Back to the dumb row.
How's this:
"Claiming to have been “blacklisted” is Hollywood’s version of coming over on the Mayflower."
Ann Coulter.
Heck, all he wanted to do was hide any affiliation with an organized crime 'family' that killed one hundred million human beings...
a mere bag o' shells.
With the list of credits that I provided, it's kind of tough for you to claim that he was 'ruined,' huh?
So, let's see how you're doing: battin' zero (mostel).
Is that where you are putting down the goalposts, dope?
You say he wasn't blacklisted, I prove he was from 1951-1959, so you claim that he didn't physically starve during those years?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Aren't you tired of me kicking your ass?
Yeah, talking on and on about people with whom Senator McCarthy never had any contact at all is REALLY kicking her ass. I'm awestruck at the brilliant debating tactic of getting things utterly, completely, laughably wrong and then sticking blindly to them after having their wrongness pointed out to you.