JoeB131
Diamond Member
What a chuckle. Uh, which among the sources I cited are "Bircher" sources? I take it you didn't bother to actually read any of them, right? Otherwise, you would have known that none of them are "Bircher" sources. One of them was a New York Times article.
Again, I don't bother reading Bircher Propaganda. I think the first one was from some Right Wing Source, the rest I ignored. d
Did it ever occur to you that you can't trust Soviet statistics?! Did that thought every pop into your Communist-brainwashed mind? Did it occur to you that in order to try to cover up their years of mass murders, the Soviets would fiddle with their population statistics in the hope that useful idiots, or willing sympathizers, like you would gobble them up and said, "Gee, you see! The Soviets couldn't have killed all those millions of people!"
Nope, that's actually.. kind of idiotic. Most countries know they need accurate census statistics to function. The reality- Stalin probably killed a lot of people. Just not that many.
Now, are you going to deal with the evidence presented in the articles I cited that Stalin killed some 20 million people?
Guy, you are the same person who claimed the Rape of Nanking wasn't that bad, the Chinese and Koreans were better off under Japanese Rule (even though they STILL hate the Japs today), and of course, my favorite, Joseph Smith was REALLY talking to God.
Stalin killed nowhere near 20 million people, and the only way you even get into some of the more exotic numbers is if you count the civil war and famines..