Secretary of State Marco Rubio On The Facts

My issue is since they’ve been enriching uranium since the 1990’s, why couldn’t any POTUS since then have gone to Congress, like it says in the Constitution

All of a sudden it’s too urgent to go to Congress!

Is Iran the only nation not allowed to have nukes? What about Aruba? Eritrea?

Are nukes the only WMD that nations aren’t allowed to have?

Ukraine had 35 Bioweapon labs

View attachment 1130050
Did Hussein know about this?
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


We are signatories to that treaty: it forbids his guaranteeing nukes to Iran. It's a law.

AI Overview

A war criminal is an individual who has committed a serious violation of the laws and customs of war, also known as war crimes, during an armed conflict.

Hussein Obama.....war criminal.

1750808603906.webp





The law the war criminal broke has been a law since 1970
 
1970s Liberal who followed Ted the Lion of Liberalism


center-left Democrat? :auiqs.jpg:
You didn't go so far as to say I am incorrect, so I will put you in the column of thinking Democrats who will not simply vote for whatever the party decides to run on.


That is a rarity, it seems, among Democrat posters on the board.
Sadly.
 
You didn't go so far as to say I am incorrect, so I will put you in the column of thinking Democrats who will not simply vote for whatever the party decides to run on.


That is a rarity, it seems, among Democrat posters on the board.
Sadly.
We don't go anywhere with people who seem to demand we do.

Whatever the party demands? I know of no demands from the Democratic party. None. What the party runs on? Primaries decide that for a general election -- the caveat being winning campaigns have the final say.
 
We don't go anywhere with people who seem to demand we do.

Whatever the party demands? I know of no demands from the Democratic party. None. What the party runs on? Primaries decide that for a general election -- the caveat being winning campaigns have the final say.
"We don't go anywhere with people who seem to demand we do."


The agenda of the party at election time is such a demand.

This was the agenda that cost the party, and the demand that partisons vote for: I have a feeling that you weren't entirely copacetic with it.

Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system
 
"We don't go anywhere with people who seem to demand we do."


The agenda of the party at election time is such a demand.

This was the agenda that cost the party, and the demand that partisons vote for: I have a feeling that you weren't entirely copacetic with it.

Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system
What happened to you? You appear to be civil and ... I say "civil" because I could not say "more civil" :rolleyes:

Now, unlike the GOP that has a history of marching in lockstep and demanding types of litmus tests, the DNC has no stated "agenda" utside of getting elected to effect change -- a party platform is not even a demand of anything. Democrats can never be on message like Republicans have been able to be. Just ask people like Newt and Luntz
 
What happened to you? You appear to be civil and ... I say "civil" because I could not say "more civil" :rolleyes:

Now, unlike the GOP that has a history of marching in lockstep and demanding types of litmus tests, the DNC has no stated "agenda" utside of getting elected to effect change -- a party platform is not even a demand of anything. Democrats can never be on message like Republicans have been able to be. Just ask people like Newt and Luntz
Because we both see the danger of a Communist takeover of one of our parties. I have always written that America needs two strong pro-America parties based on our hereitage and Judeo-Christian principle, as were our Founders.


It wasn't so long ago:


AI Overview

In the 1990s, while both the Republican and Democratic parties held varying views, there were areas of greater agreement and perceived alignment on core American values compared to the current political landscape
.
Points to consider:
  • Shared "Pro-America" Stance: While specific policy approaches differed, both parties during the 1990s largely presented their platforms as aimed at strengthening the nation and pursuing its interests. For instance, the 1996 Republican platform expressed a desire for "A strong America that protects its citizens and champions their democratic ideals throughout the world". The 1992 Democratic platform also emphasized improving America and solving national problems.
  • Greater Policy Agreement: In the early 1990s, the parties' policy agendas had more similarities than they do today, with a greater diversity of opinions within each party. Both parties, for example, showed more agreement on issues related to climate change in the 1990s compared to recent years.
  • Bipartisan Legislation: The 1990s saw the passage of significant bipartisan legislation. Examples include the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, which had bipartisan support and was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. Additionally, welfare reform in 1996, while debated, was ultimately passed by Congress with bipartisan support and signed by President Clinton.
 
Of nothing.

This is not the 1950s except in rhetoric from you
Bernie, AOC and Mamdani are communists and Democrats.

Your party is in the throes of a battle for the soul and the spirit of the party.

if the Communist Democrats win, will you vote for their agenda?


If the direction of the Democrat Party, nationally, mirrors that of Mamdani, Bernie, and AOC, will you vote Democrat?



Mamdani proposed increasing taxes on white neighborhoods –







A document on his website explains the policy idea to “shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods.”



Mamdani is already leaning into his socialist views, telling CNN that he has “many critiques of capitalism.



….he would eliminate fares on all city buses



......he plans to address the cost of food by creating city-owned grocery stores that will pay no rent or property taxes, buy and sell at wholesale prices from centralized warehouses and partner with local vendors to keep prices down.



.... raise NYC's minimum wage to $30



"Pressed on whether New York’s Jewish population could depend on him to protect them with antisemitic attacks on the rise in the United States, the candidate answered emphatically: “Antisemitism is not simply something that we should talk about."www.the-independent.com



Zohran Mamdani’s political positions, from Trump and ICE to Israel



Progressive shocks front-runner Andrew Cuomo in New York City mayoral race with stunning upset

www.the-independent.com www.the-independent.com



... won the New York City primary race because of his support for Palestine,




I am looking for thinking Democrats, who understand what WaPo wrote:

The Post agrees, and they give the entire game away in their headline: Zohran Mamdani’s victory is bad for New York and the Democratic Party.




Where do you stand?
 
The GOP has a very, very long history of attacking the Courts. They have run on it in every major election of my lifetime.
OK.
You insist.

1. The Democrat Party has a history of ignoring the Constitution, and the most basic right, being treated equally with every other American.

The contemporary Right is a supporter of religion, while the left abjors both the Constitution and religion.

What possible justification could there be for the Democrats silencing those who speak out against evil?????

Unless evil is what the Democrats represent.




Democrats put an anti-free speech advocate on the Supreme Court, and passed a law forbidding free speech:
. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????


The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?


Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



The contrast is startlingly clear: the Right supports both religion and the Constitution.

"My Administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the Constitutional right to pray in public schools. In America, we do not punish prayer. We do not tear down crosses. We do not ban symbols of faith. We do not muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith. We cherish religion. We lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the Glory of God!"
Trump, SOTU 2020



2. With knowledge that they cannot win a national election without the black vote, the Democrats instituted racial priorities and discrimination against straight white male.
Mamdani has stated he agree with this....highter taxes on whites.
Discrimination in college admission.....Trump brought it to court.


3.While pretending that all sorts of mandates were in effect for Covid, to shut down Trump's miraculous economy, the Democrats ushered in some 12 million un vetted and un vaccinated illegals.


4. Advaned and condoned riots in honor of Saint George Floyd.


5. Insisted that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism be guaranteed nuclear weapons.


6. Sold American policy to the highest bidder abroad,

7. Used every possible weapon against Trump, but failed in the court of public opinion.....Over 77 million voted him "innocent."
 
OK.
You insist.

1. The Democrat Party has a history of ignoring the Constitution, and the most basic right, being treated equally with every other American.

The contemporary Right is a supporter of religion, while the left abjors both the Constitution and religion.

What possible justification could there be for the Democrats silencing those who speak out against evil?????

Unless evil is what the Democrats represent.




Democrats put an anti-free speech advocate on the Supreme Court, and passed a law forbidding free speech:
. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????


The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?


Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



The contrast is startlingly clear: the Right supports both religion and the Constitution.

"My Administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the Constitutional right to pray in public schools. In America, we do not punish prayer. We do not tear down crosses. We do not ban symbols of faith. We do not muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith. We cherish religion. We lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the Glory of God!"
Trump, SOTU 2020



2. With knowledge that they cannot win a national election without the black vote, the Democrats instituted racial priorities and discrimination against straight white male.
Mamdani has stated he agree with this....highter taxes on whites.
Discrimination in college admission.....Trump brought it to court.


3.While pretending that all sorts of mandates were in effect for Covid, to shut down Trump's miraculous economy, the Democrats ushered in some 12 million un vetted and un vaccinated illegals.


4. Advaned and condoned riots in honor of Saint George Floyd.


5. Insisted that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism be guaranteed nuclear weapons.


6. Sold American policy to the highest bidder abroad,

7. Used every possible weapon against Trump, but failed in the court of public opinion.....Over 77 million voted him "innocent."


Nobody . Advaned and condoned riots in honor of Saint George Floyd.

bye bye
 
Nobody . Advaned and condoned riots in honor of Saint George Floyd.

bye bye
Watch me destroy that lie.

Who Is Really Good At Riots???



Accepted And Encouraged -The Worst Pathologies…. post 106





Kamala Harris: riots shouldn't stop!









Every Democrat calling for violence:







“Nancy Pelosi wonders why there ‘aren’t uprisings’ across nation: ‘Maybe there will be’”




“Rep. Ayanna Pressley calls for 'unrest in the streets' ahead of election
“There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there’s unrest in our lives, and unfortunately, there’s plenty to go around,” the Massachusetts Democrat and member of the so-called “Squad” told MSNBC’s Tiffany Cross.” Ayanna Pressley calls for ‘unrest in the streets’ ahead of election





The Speech As Incitement Case Against Trump Continues to Crumble“ [On] January 5, 2021, an unknown individual placed two pipe bombs in Washington, D.C. One pipe bomb was placed at the headquarters of the RNC … and the other was placed at the headquarters of the DNC,” the FBI said.

NBC News reported that the FBI and the NYPD alerted the Capitol Police in advance as to the possibility that there would be violence and rioting on the day of Trump’s speech. Such news countered previous assertions by federal law enforcement officials that they were unaware of any intelligence suggesting protesters would become violent and possibly storm the Capitol.

The Democrats’ chief argument against Trump is that he “incited” rioters with his speech. It’s always been a specious argument at best. But if all of this was preplanned – and it’s becoming more obvious by the day that it was, their case falls apart.” The Speech As Incitement Case Against Trump Continues to Crumble





"28 Times Media And Democrats Excused Or Endorsed Violence Committed By Left-Wing Activists


These Fascists….Democrats….are really upset about the Capitol riot, the one seeded by Biden voters….but they all have newsheimers…..no memory of

1. ….hundreds of riots across the country, the ones they supported leading up to the election

2. ….of thousands of police officers injured

3. …of the $billions in damage done by their voters

4. …burning city blocks

5. …of the phony CNN news media people like Ali Velshi, telling us it’s mostly peaceful, while he is standing in front of what looks like Dresden.

6. So they noticed one riot of the hundreds, and as a result militarized Washington, DC, with thousands of troops.

7. “​

8. Biden voters have been burning and sacking cities for months….and we never saw that sort of headline. Some 30 people killed in the Biden/Harris riots….but the yellow press was silent.​



9. "28 Times Media And Democrats Excused Or Endorsed Violence Committed By Left-Wing Activists
After excusing and ignoring riots from leftists all year, Democrats and their allies in the media are ready to condemn riots now that the turmoil has shifted to fit their narrative."




28 Times Media And Democrats Excused Violence By Left-Wing Activists
After excusing and ignoring riots from leftists, Democrats and their allies in the media are ready to condemn riots now that the turmoil has shifted.



thefederalist.com



10. Police officer shoots perpetrator about to stab a citizen to death, and the Democrats claim racism.

Democrat doing what Democrats do: lie.







CNN Claims Kenosha Protests Are ‘Fiery But Mostly Peaceful’ As City Burns Behind Reporter





And then she organized bail for rioters and looters and arsonists.

Bail fund backed by Kamala Harris freed same rioter twice

https://www.foxnews.com › politics › bail-fund-kamala-h...
Feb 2, 2021 — A man who was twice bailed out of jail in separate cases by a fund supported by Vice President Kamala Harris has been arrested again while ...

Man twice bailed out by Harris-supported fund arrested again

https://nypost.com › 2021/02/03 › man-twice-bailed-ou...
Feb 3, 2021 — Thomas Moseley's latest collar stems from his arrest on Oct. 15., when he was charged with damaging a Minneapolis Police Department's Fifth ...

Bail fund backed by Kamala Harris freed man charged with ...

https://nypost.com › 2021/09/08 › bail-fund-backed-by...
Sep 8, 2021 — A bail fund promoted by Vice President Kamala Harris helped lead to the release of an alleged Minneapolis domestic abuser -- who has now ...
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom