Second Ukraine whistleblower has "firsthand knowledge" of Trump allegations
The NYT's got the info first. How is it that the most partisan rags are ALWAYS the first to break news stories and they report on them so fast.
Also, we were told that the whistle blower was not important since we have transcripts and texts so why another one? How many different ways does the story need to be told?
That's the same question that I asked. We have the transcript. We have both President's reports on the call. What else is needed to know what transpired on the call?
WB2 described the call as "crazy" and "frightening" and was "visibly shaken."
The transcript, aside from the congratulations, Trump asked Zelensky for two things: an investigation into Crowdstrike, the company that performed the forensic examination of the DNC servers in lieu of the FBI, and cooperation in investigating the Biden's —
pere et fil's — involvement in the suspended prosecution of Ukrainian company Burisma, which employed Hunter Biden. This is what is supposed to have been "crazy" and "frightening" and left WB2 "visibly shaken."
Now, what could have been so emotionally charged in that call? The transcript is low-key: no shouting, no screaming, and no threats.
The only people who would be "visibly shaken" by that would be someone who already has guilty knowledge of Crowdstrike, Burisma, or both.
The really just astonishing irregularity of the "impeachment inquiry": not just refusing to take it to the floor of the House, but the secrecy, the selective cherry-picking of releases, and the plan to prevent Republican members — not to mention the nation — from learning anything about either WB1 or WB2.
The most plausible inference is that the whistleblowers are connected to Biden's campaign, or to the DNC, and were shaken by the possibility of Biden and Crowdstrike being investigated because they know the dangers there.
It's time for the Democrat majority on HPSCI to come clean: what did they know, when did they know it, and who are they
really protecting with their unprecedented secrecy?
Who Does the Whistleblower Know?