Second Civil War Turning Violent?

Spare_change

Gold Member
Jun 27, 2011
8,690
1,293
280
By Dennis Prager -

In a recent column, I made the case that Americans are fighting the Second Civil War. The deep chasm that has opened up between the left -- not liberals, the left -- and the rest of the country is so wide and so unbridgeable that there is no other way to describe what is happening. But I noted that at least thus far, unlike the First Civil War, this war is not violent.

Unfortunately, there is now reason to believe that violence is coming. In fact, it's already here. But as of now, it's only coming from one direction.

Left-wing thugs engage in violence and threats of violence with utter impunity. They shut down speakers at colleges; block highways, bridges and airport terminals; take over college buildings and offices; occupy state capitals; and terrorize individuals at their homes.

In order to understand why more violence may be coming, it is essential to understand that left-wing mobs are almost never stopped, arrested or punished. Colleges do nothing to stop them, and civil authorities do nothing to stop them on campuses or anywhere else. Police are reduced to spectators as they watch left-wing gangs loot stores, smash business and car windows, and even take over state capitals (as in Madison, Wisconsin).

It's beginning to dawn on many Americans that mayors, police chiefs and college presidents have no interest in stopping this violence. Left-wing officials sympathize with the lawbreakers, and the police, who rarely sympathize with thugs of any ideology, are ordered to do nothing by emasculated police chiefs.

Consequently, given the abdication by all these authorities of their role to protect the public, some members of the public will inevitably decide that they will protect themselves and others.

This ability of the left to get away with violence is one of the gravest threats to American society in its modern history. Since the Civil War, I can think of only two comparable eruptions of mob violence that authorities allowed. One was when white mobs lynched blacks. The other was the rioting by blacks, such as the Los Angeles riots 25 years ago, and the recent riots in Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland.

Today, authorities in what we once proudly proclaimed the "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave" are intimidated to the point of paralysis.

And exactly what do they fear? Not violence -- they have made peace with left-wing violence. What they fear is the left-wing media. If the Black Lives Matter movement is forcefully prevented from blocking tens of thousands of cars from entering or leaving San Francisco, the police and local authorities will be labeled racist by black leaders, a smear that will then be echoed by The New York Times and rest of the left-wing media.

Likewise, if a college president requests enough police to come to a college campus so that a Heather Mac Donald, a Charles Murray or an Ann Coulter can deliver a lecture, some of the student-gangsters engaged in violence might be injured -- and that college president will then be pilloried by the mainstream media.
 
By Dennis Prager -

In a recent column, I made the case that Americans are fighting the Second Civil War. The deep chasm that has opened up between the left -- not liberals, the left -- and the rest of the country is so wide and so unbridgeable that there is no other way to describe what is happening. But I noted that at least thus far, unlike the First Civil War, this war is not violent.

Unfortunately, there is now reason to believe that violence is coming. In fact, it's already here. But as of now, it's only coming from one direction.

Left-wing thugs engage in violence and threats of violence with utter impunity. They shut down speakers at colleges; block highways, bridges and airport terminals; take over college buildings and offices; occupy state capitals; and terrorize individuals at their homes.

In order to understand why more violence may be coming, it is essential to understand that left-wing mobs are almost never stopped, arrested or punished. Colleges do nothing to stop them, and civil authorities do nothing to stop them on campuses or anywhere else. Police are reduced to spectators as they watch left-wing gangs loot stores, smash business and car windows, and even take over state capitals (as in Madison, Wisconsin).

It's beginning to dawn on many Americans that mayors, police chiefs and college presidents have no interest in stopping this violence. Left-wing officials sympathize with the lawbreakers, and the police, who rarely sympathize with thugs of any ideology, are ordered to do nothing by emasculated police chiefs.

Consequently, given the abdication by all these authorities of their role to protect the public, some members of the public will inevitably decide that they will protect themselves and others.

This ability of the left to get away with violence is one of the gravest threats to American society in its modern history. Since the Civil War, I can think of only two comparable eruptions of mob violence that authorities allowed. One was when white mobs lynched blacks. The other was the rioting by blacks, such as the Los Angeles riots 25 years ago, and the recent riots in Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland.

Today, authorities in what we once proudly proclaimed the "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave" are intimidated to the point of paralysis.

And exactly what do they fear? Not violence -- they have made peace with left-wing violence. What they fear is the left-wing media. If the Black Lives Matter movement is forcefully prevented from blocking tens of thousands of cars from entering or leaving San Francisco, the police and local authorities will be labeled racist by black leaders, a smear that will then be echoed by The New York Times and rest of the left-wing media.

Likewise, if a college president requests enough police to come to a college campus so that a Heather Mac Donald, a Charles Murray or an Ann Coulter can deliver a lecture, some of the student-gangsters engaged in violence might be injured -- and that college president will then be pilloried by the mainstream media.
Second only to Muslims, progressives are the most intolerant people on the planet… Fact
 
Pot stirrers won't last and there are not as many as some would like the people to believe.
 
By Dennis Prager -

In a recent column, I made the case that Americans are fighting the Second Civil War. The deep chasm that has opened up between the left -- not liberals, the left -- and the rest of the country is so wide and so unbridgeable that there is no other way to describe what is happening. But I noted that at least thus far, unlike the First Civil War, this war is not violent.

Unfortunately, there is now reason to believe that violence is coming. In fact, it's already here. But as of now, it's only coming from one direction.

Left-wing thugs engage in violence and threats of violence with utter impunity. They shut down speakers at colleges; block highways, bridges and airport terminals; take over college buildings and offices; occupy state capitals; and terrorize individuals at their homes.

In order to understand why more violence may be coming, it is essential to understand that left-wing mobs are almost never stopped, arrested or punished. Colleges do nothing to stop them, and civil authorities do nothing to stop them on campuses or anywhere else. Police are reduced to spectators as they watch left-wing gangs loot stores, smash business and car windows, and even take over state capitals (as in Madison, Wisconsin).

It's beginning to dawn on many Americans that mayors, police chiefs and college presidents have no interest in stopping this violence. Left-wing officials sympathize with the lawbreakers, and the police, who rarely sympathize with thugs of any ideology, are ordered to do nothing by emasculated police chiefs.

Consequently, given the abdication by all these authorities of their role to protect the public, some members of the public will inevitably decide that they will protect themselves and others.

This ability of the left to get away with violence is one of the gravest threats to American society in its modern history. Since the Civil War, I can think of only two comparable eruptions of mob violence that authorities allowed. One was when white mobs lynched blacks. The other was the rioting by blacks, such as the Los Angeles riots 25 years ago, and the recent riots in Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland.

Today, authorities in what we once proudly proclaimed the "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave" are intimidated to the point of paralysis.

And exactly what do they fear? Not violence -- they have made peace with left-wing violence. What they fear is the left-wing media. If the Black Lives Matter movement is forcefully prevented from blocking tens of thousands of cars from entering or leaving San Francisco, the police and local authorities will be labeled racist by black leaders, a smear that will then be echoed by The New York Times and rest of the left-wing media.

Likewise, if a college president requests enough police to come to a college campus so that a Heather Mac Donald, a Charles Murray or an Ann Coulter can deliver a lecture, some of the student-gangsters engaged in violence might be injured -- and that college president will then be pilloried by the mainstream media.
Second only to Muslims, progressives are the most intolerant people on the planet… Fact

It's a sad----relatively NEW fact------not entirely new------even way back in the 60s---the "ENLIGHTENED marijuana, LSD soaked kids" seemed stupid to me--- very dogmatic. But lately------the ENLIGHTENED got even more stupid-----
Charles Dickens was right-----in his DEPICTION OF MADAME DEFARGE
 
The relatively low level and age of veterans and servicemen in the blue jurisdictions makes this a stupid move.
 
Bernie's Bolsheviks and Trump's Brown Shirts have been rioting against each other.

But these two fringe groups on the far extremes of the left and right are not indicative of the Nation as a whole.

As a whole the Nation can still agree to disagree and go with the majority rule at least for the next 2 years.

No worries then.
 
It's not going to be a very long war when one side is afraid of guns.
 
There is no second civil war going on. Claiming there is is just a sign of the arrogance and imagined self-importance of extremist. The civil rights era and the antiwar era during the Vietnam era were far more divisive and violent than what is happening today.
 
There is no second civil war going on. Claiming there is is just a sign of the arrogance and imagined self-importance of extremist. The civil rights era and the antiwar era during the Vietnam era were far more divisive and violent than what is happening today.
We may not have another Kent state but with the rise of antifia? The chances go up.
 
There is no second civil war going on. Claiming there is is just a sign of the arrogance and imagined self-importance of extremist. The civil rights era and the antiwar era during the Vietnam era were far more divisive and violent than what is happening today.
We may not have another Kent state but with the rise of antifia? The chances go up.
We don't have huge riots, churches with children in them being bombed, hundreds of thousands of protesters regularly filling the streets, civil rights workers being assassinated, university buildings being bombed and a whole lot of other violent incidents taking place. We have extremist brawling with each other and that is what you are comparing to the civil rights and anti-war movements of the sixties and seventies. That, and speculation that today's difficulties might get worse and reach those levels of violence and divisiveness.
 
The idea of a Second Civil War is nothing more than the wet dream of a few righty loons.
 
There is no second civil war going on. Claiming there is is just a sign of the arrogance and imagined self-importance of extremist. The civil rights era and the antiwar era during the Vietnam era were far more divisive and violent than what is happening today.
We may not have another Kent state but with the rise of antifia? The chances go up.
We don't have huge riots, churches with children in them being bombed, hundreds of thousands of protesters regularly filling the streets, civil rights workers being assassinated, university buildings being bombed and a whole lot of other violent incidents taking place. We have extremist brawling with each other and that is what you are comparing to the civil rights and anti-war movements of the sixties and seventies. That, and speculation that today's difficulties might get worse and reach those levels of violence and divisiveness.
I was alive during the build up to the riots and well remember the riots themselves. In 68 we moved my grandmother out of East St Louis where she had lived since the 30s. The riots are because of that new terrorist group antifia. And if you recall the mayor of Baltimore gave looters and rioters a place to steal and burn.

Mlk was peaceful and antifia is not. Antifia is going to bring us the same kind of riots that were regular in Belfast North Ireland. The stone throwing and malovtof cocktails are already present. Bombings will come soon enough.
Another example of what's coming would be Mandela's anc which burned bombed civilian stores and public gathering spots. Both antifia and the anc were or are communist based.

You simply are not facing the enemy of old for control of a government but the possible death of the system. That is their goal and it's always important to note the goal of the enemy because your ideas and rules do not apply to him. That is what he is fighting about. His idea of government is not Republican or Democrat it's communist and that party has no room for you if you are not them!

I suggest you buy a long gun and a sidearm because the day you think you might need one will be to late to get one.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top