Of course they will...You can't be guilty of something just because your political rivals thing you might be... where would that stop... and that's the question the supreme court will ask itself....
How would it not be?
Because you are not guilty of something because your political rivals think that you are... that's not the American way... do you want to change that?....
Bullshit is still bullshit no matter how many times you repeat the bullshit. Even if you start to believe your own bullshit, it is STILL bullshit . Even the voices in your head know it’s bullshit –they are just fucking with you .
And therein lies the rub. There WAS no attempt to overthrow the government, as evidenced by the complete and total lack of any plan what to do should the government that has F-15s and nukes be destroyed by grandmas waving little flags. For the court to credibly accuse TRUMP! of insurrection, they would have to agree that the riot was a serious attempt to overthrow said government, and that's going to be a tall order.
Dream on... don't you get tired of being wrong?...
Two strikes.
He hasn't, and won't be charged with insurrection. DOJ already made that decision.
They already have - scroll back up.
8. Is a criminal conviction necessary to trigger Section Three?
This Court is thus not the only decisionmaker in a complex electoral-college system. States have wide discretion in structuring their systems, both procedurally and substantively. See Hassan v. Colorado, 495 F. App’x 487 (10th Cir. 2012) (Gorsuch, J.) (“[A] state’s legitimate interest in protecting the integrity and practical functioning of the political process permits it to exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office”). In many ways, state courts, and not this Court, are the main backstops. See Moore v. Harper, 600 U.S. at 34–37
There has to be proof he ordered an insurrection....
dictionary.cambridge.org
In Trump’s case—as with the paradigm case of Floyd—there exists a complex web of spidery actions and inactions, as the trial court below made clear in its findings of fact. Especially because some of Trump’s own actions of plotting and incitement prompted actual violent insurrection by others, he was under a stronger duty to take affirmative steps to arrest that insurrection once it erupted into a deadly assault on the Capitol. It was perfectly sensible for the trial court to consider Trump’s entire course of conduct, including his inactions, as a wholeThere has to be proof he ordered an insurrection....
insurrection
1. an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and…
And he didn't... he is on video tape saying go in peace... that's all I need to know... the group was riled up by members of our FBI.... so if anyone should be convicted its them....
And Pelosi and the capitol police chief...
