Scientists Refuting Darwinism

[Dagosa]

My knowledge isn't preventing you from posting evidence.
So post it. If your evidence confuses me, I'll be sure to ask you to explain it.

Unless you're gonna run away again. LOL!

Nope. You slackers are engaged in woo woo. That’s usin* science sounding words and not even knowing what they mean. Then, you want credit for what, knowing science ? What is potential energy ?

 

[Dagosa]

Still waiting for your evidence........pussy.

Still waiting for you prove you can speak English. I used the term “potential“ energy in my FIRST expiation…..and you don’t even know what it means. It’s hilarious.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still waiting for you prove you can speak English.

Dagosa is a pussy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That’s usin* science sounding words and not even knowing what they mean.

Sun's gravity....Earth's uranium..........go!!!!!

And by go I mean run away like a little pussy, pussy.

 

[Dagosa]

Sun's gravity....Earth's uranium..........go!!!!!

And by go I mean run away like a little pussy, pussy.

Potential energy…it explains everything, brainless.

 

[Dagosa]

Dagosa is a pussy.

Don’t get mad at me cause you can’t get any satisfaction.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Potential energy…it explains everything, brainless.

You're free to post all about your potential energy...sun's gravity...Earth's uranium theory.

Go!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Don’t get mad at me cause you can’t get any satisfaction.

Your cowardice and ignorance doesn't make me angry, it makes me chuckle.

 

[Dagosa]

You're free to post all about your potential energy...sun's gravity...Earth's uranium theory.

Go!!!

You‘r free to tell us what you know about potential energy, go.

 

[Dagosa]

Your cowardice and ignorance doesn't make me angry, it makes me chuckle.

You’re brainlessness caused absolutely no response whatsoever. I could not care less .

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You‘r free to tell us what you know about potential energy, go.

Why does my failure to post stop you from showing your evidence?
Are you that weak?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You’re brainlessness caused absolutely no response whatsoever. I could not care less .

OK pussy.

 

[Dagosa]

Why does my failure to post stop you from showing your evidence?
Are you that weak?

Because you’re a loser who pretends he knows anything about anything.,

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because you’re a loser who pretends he knows anything about anything.,

You say, as you run away like a pussy.

 

[Indeependent]

You say, as you run away like a pussy.

Please don't tell me you actually took Dagosa seriously.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Please don't tell me you actually took Dagosa seriously.

He's a serious pussy.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

I looked at the first and last name and see they both did their work decades ago. Got anyone from this century?

At first I was wondering if this was referring to "chemengineers" post or Charles Darwin?,..but then I realized you would have said "centuries" and not "decades" if you meant Darwin

Socrates was brilliant but if he didn't believe in evolution it wouldn't carry much weight.

I think this is the problem Darwin/Darwinism is running into.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Nobody is attacking God. Genesis and Exodus are foundation myths for Bronze Age people.

as the "big bang" and "evolution" are the technologically enhanced versions [or sequels if you prefer] for the socially educated

 

[alang1216]

I think this is the problem Darwin/Darwinism is running into.

Non-scientists who believe they know more than the scientists because they have faith?

 

[Donald H]

Really ? A little expansion on this one idea.
Science Theories are not “right” or absolute to begin with is why they are called theories. They are expanded upon as new evidence is found. They are ALL useful within the confines of the evidence that supports them.

Take Newtonian physics. Does anything else make it “right or wrong” just because it doesn’t apply to sub atomic particles ? Nope. Aamof, you can say no theory is complete until you do show exceptions and expansions

No, let's stay with Darwinian evolution. The more modern Christians aren't trying to make it right or wrong, they're trying to combine it with the creation myths as a dishonest compromise. No matter how hard they try, the two are just contradictory.

Good for you to not allow them to do that!

I would suggest that the creation myth can't be useful when there's no evidence to support it.
However, it's not my mission to deny how it comforts people who are ignorant of the facts. The people who debate on this board aren't seeking comfort from their religion.