Olde Europe
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2014
- 6,025
- 4,523
- 2,065
Preponderance of evidence, or consensus, does not a proven theory make. Therefore, anyone who suggests/and/or insists the science on this question is settled, is only doing so because it fits their agenda...………..you know, kinda like Trump was a Russian agent, and all of you KNEW he colluded, lol.
This is why people like YOU; and if ya don't know who that is, go look in the mirror...………..have exactly ZERO credibility. You claim that things that are later proven to be FALSE, are actually true. You claim that things that are unproven, actually are. And then, when your narrative falls apart, you start a new one, rinse and repeat.
While you don't want my advice, I will give it anyway--------->if you said------------->if this is true, it could be terrible, we need to demand they look into it further...………...now that makes sense.
But to come along, claim it is true and that it is settled science, that makes you a joke...………...because anyone who has had anything to do with scientific studies knows INSTANTLY you are full of crap as a Thanksgiving turkey!
And I am being nice. Most other Conservatives would hammer you mercilessly for your misguided, totally inaccurate statements.
This is just to note the above is complete crap. The author is perfectly clueless, a mindless conspiracy theorist, doesn't begin to understand how consensus settles scientific questions, and how science progresses. But then, he also confuses his foul, ignorant language and his self-fellating lol-ing with "being nice" - nicer even than other conservative nitwits would be. So that settles it.