Scientists get a better picture of how reptles lost their limbs...

Correct.

What james bond and Cougarbear do is engage in "backwards think".

All new information is manipulated through various dishonest means to fit the prescribed premises.


What this causes is dishonesty and self-contradiction. It matters not if their reactionary manipulation is self consistent on the whole. Only the reflexive reaction in any given instance matters.

This causes them to contradict themselves quite often and to make elementay and embarrassing errors in fact and logic. But the entire venture is dishonest from the start,so they really do not care.

Concepts like "mutually supportive evidence" and deduction have no place in their dog and pony show.
There is no need for what you think we do.

I pointed out our main differences with having creation, natural selection and the global flood vs long time and microevolution/evolution by natural selection. However, one species cannot become another species due to DNA. No amount of mutation can change a DNA to have that wasn't there in the beginning. Finally, there has been no evidence for macroevolution so it has been disproved.
 

Forum List

Back
Top