So how did the universe create that first life?But the universe did create life and intelligence did evolve. I'm arguing that life arising is like the universe being matter filled instead of only radiation filled. It's improbable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So how did the universe create that first life?But the universe did create life and intelligence did evolve. I'm arguing that life arising is like the universe being matter filled instead of only radiation filled. It's improbable.
Can you thumbnail it for me? Or is google search the extent of you talent?
Why not?What is not self evident is that the first form of life was a cell.
OMG, seriously? If it is a natural process, it should be easy to reproduce.The Earth was a different place back then. What would happen to a long chain organic molecule if it appeared today with lots of bacteria and other life to eat it?
No idea. The best guess is hot, wet conditions, long chains of organic molecules and chance. Chance as in the chain forming in the correct sequence and chance in the chain folding itself in the correct sequence. Which tells me that it was probably somewhere on the sea floor near a thermal vent.So how did the universe create that first life?
OMG, seriously? If it is a natural process, it should be easy to reproduce.
My bad, I thought you'd be able to understand the science but here's the thumbnail:Can you thumbnail it for me? Or is google search the extent of you talent?
Too complex to have formed spontaneously.Why not?
Ok, so where's the evolution part? Because that's what we are discussing, right?My bad, I thought you'd be able to understand the science but here's the thumbnail:
Through ionic intercalation the clay layered structure units can be modified and enabled to self-assemble into ordered arrays such as rod-, dendrite-, and fiber-like microstructures
And yet it did. So however improbable it is, that's what happened. Long chains of organic compounds which mimicked amino acids folding themselves in the correct sequence.Too complex to have formed spontaneously.
It would be if we had a world without free oxygen but with plenty of other elements and molecules, an atmosphere, a variety of geophysical structure, no pre-existing life, and a few hundred million years.OMG, seriously? If it is a natural process, it should be easy to reproduce.
I think you are butt hurt.My bad, I thought you'd be able to understand the science...
Or lot's of time on the ocean floor near thermal vents.It would be if we had a world without free oxygen but with plenty of other elements and molecules, an atmosphere, a variety of geophysical structure, no pre-existing life, and a few hundred million years.
Self-assembly would be error-prone and any that made the process more efficient would be selected for.Ok, so where's the evolution part? Because that's what we are discussing, right?
It sounds more plausible than your belief that inanimate matter evolved according to natural selection.Self-assembly would be error-prone and any that made the process more efficient would be selected for.
Believe whatever you wish but I doubt that idea has much support in the scientific literature. Am I right?And yet it did. So however improbable it is, that's what happened. Long chains of organic compounds which mimicked amino acids folding themselves in the correct sequence.
That's where I first heard it from. Did you honestly think I made it up on my own. I had no idea about the folding sequences of amino acids.Believe whatever you wish but I doubt that idea has much support in the scientific literature. Am I right?
Natural processes are repeatable, right? Replicate the conditions and it should occur, right?Given the cooling earth, the change in the atmosphere and therefore the sun radiation spectra. You would have different conditions every few million years.
And life could have spawned, when one of those windows produced just the right conditions.
The problem with trying to recreate a natural process that occurred over millions if not billions of years, isn't something that can be readily replicated on the time scale humans exist on.
You have a temperature scale from above boiling to below freezing. Light conditions covering different levels of visible, UV-a UV-b UV-c and gamma radiation. Plus changing atmospheric gases. That means as many different conditions as grains of sand on a beach. So unless you know which grain of sand was the correct set of conditions, running the experiment with any other set would fail.Natural processes are repeatable, right? Replicate the conditions and it should occur, right?
Do you think conditions on the sea floor have changed significantly?You have a temperature scale from above boiling to below freezing. Light conditions covering different levels of visible, UV-a UV-b UV-c and gamma radiation. Plus changing atmospheric gases. That means as many different conditions as grains of sand on a beach. So unless you know which grain of sand was the correct set of conditions, running the experiment with any other set would fail.