Scientist scared about funding..now they are having their own march

[Old Rocks]

Fascism always needs to silence and shut up things that they don't like...Can't stand up to what the research and data says...So hell, lets cut its funding off and put our fingers in our ears....Lalalala,

Conservativism has always been a cancer that held humanity back as it demands that we stay in the dark past.

Who said anything about cutting off funding? They are in panic mode because Trump cleaned the books off with Obama propaganda on junk science.

.

For years they kept telling us that "the science is settled". If that were true then why would they need more money?

The science is settled. Increase GHGs, and you warm the surface of the planet. Now what that will do to our economies, agriculture and infrastructure, we really don't know yet. We have not been down this road before. Dr. Francis in 2012 made predictions as to what the effects of the loss in Arctic Sea Ice would be. Now we are seeing those predictions coming true as we see intense winter storms in the interior of the Northern Continents while at the same time we are seeing very warm periods in the Arctic Ocean. Periods so warm that there was even minor ice melt in the midst of the polar night.

Yes, we need considerable more research. Research on the melt of the permafrost, research on the ocean clathrates, research on local and regional rates of sea level rise.

WRONG;

You must rule out all other means of cooling... which they did not and have not..

Now just what the hell do you mean by that? Seems we are speaking of warming, not cooling.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Fascism always needs to silence and shut up things that they don't like...Can't stand up to what the research and data says...So hell, lets cut its funding off and put our fingers in our ears....Lalalala,

Conservativism has always been a cancer that held humanity back as it demands that we stay in the dark past.

Who said anything about cutting off funding? They are in panic mode because Trump cleaned the books off with Obama propaganda on junk science.

.

For years they kept telling us that "the science is settled". If that were true then why would they need more money?

The science is settled. Increase GHGs, and you warm the surface of the planet. Now what that will do to our economies, agriculture and infrastructure, we really don't know yet. We have not been down this road before. Dr. Francis in 2012 made predictions as to what the effects of the loss in Arctic Sea Ice would be. Now we are seeing those predictions coming true as we see intense winter storms in the interior of the Northern Continents while at the same time we are seeing very warm periods in the Arctic Ocean. Periods so warm that there was even minor ice melt in the midst of the polar night.

Yes, we need considerable more research. Research on the melt of the permafrost, research on the ocean clathrates, research on local and regional rates of sea level rise.

WRONG;

You must rule out all other means of cooling... which they did not and have not..

Now just what the hell do you mean by that? Seems we are speaking of warming, not cooling.

It means that OTHER routes can distribute the energy that have not been explored and that cooling is the result. Like Water Vapor.. One of those pesky things that keep kicking you alarmists in the ass because you still don't know how to model it.

 

[Old Rocks]

Crap. The scientists stated that an increase in atmospheric temperatures would result in an increase in extreme precipitation events. And that is exactly what we have been seeing. Also, once again, you failed to link to anything backing your asinine assertion.


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618210000996

Quaternary International

Volume 226, Issues 1–2, 15 October 2010, Pages 92–100

Larger Asian Rivers: Climate Change, River Flow, and Watershed Management



Spatial distribution and temporal trends of extreme temperature and precipitation events on the Loess Plateau of China during 1961–2007

• Zhi Lia,
• Fen-li Zhenga, , ,
• Wen-zhao Liub,
• Dennis C. Flanaganc

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2010.03.003
Get rights and content


Abstract
Extreme climate events often cause catastrophic damage to nature and human society. Therefore, regional assessments in various climates and geographic regions are needed for understanding the uncertainties of the change trends for extreme climate events. The objective of this study was to assess the spatial distribution and temporal trends of extreme precipitation and temperature events on the Loess Plateau of China during 1961–2007. Nine indicators (pq90, px5d, pint, pxcdd, pnl9, txq90, tnq10, tnfd, txhw90) were chosen to quantify extreme climate events, the Mann-Kendall method and linear trend analysis were used to test the change in trend and the magnitude, and inverse distance weighted interpolation was used to interpolate the spatial patterns. Results showed that most extreme climate indicators were spatially distributed with obvious gradients from the southeast to the northwest. Heavy rainfall threshold (pq90), greatest 5-day total rainfall (px5d), heavy rainfall days (pnl9) and cold-night threshold (tnq10) decreased from the southeast to the northwest, while simple daily rainfall intensity (pint), longest dry period (pxcdd) and number of frost days (tnfd) increased from the southeast to the northwest. Most stations had monotonic trends in extreme indicators during 1961–2007. However, the number of stations with significant trends varied greatly. Precipitation-based indicators showed more mixed patterns of change and few stations had significant trends. However, temperature-based indicators had more uniform changes and most stations had significant trends. Hot-day threshold (txq90) and cold-night threshold (tnq10), and the longest heatwave (txhw90) tended to increase while the number of frost days decreased since the 1960s on the Loess Plateau. Overall, extreme precipitation events did not change significantly; however, extreme temperature events became more severe and frequent. The results implied that extreme climate events on the Loess Plateau will continue to have adverse impacts, and adaptive measures should be considered for future ecological construction and agriculturally sustainable development.

Abbreviations

• pq90, heavy rainfall threshold;
• px5d, greatest 5-day total rainfall;
• pint, simple daily rainfall intensity;
• pxcdd, longest dry period;
• pnl90, heavy rainfall days;
• txq90, hot-day threshold;
• tnq10, cold-night threshold;
• tnfd, number of frost days Tmin < 0 °C;
• txhw90, longest heatwave

 

[skookerasbil]

lol......talk about a waste of time.

 

[polarbear]

Fascism always needs to silence and shut up things that they don't like...Can't stand up to what the research and data says...So hell, lets cut its funding off and put our fingers in our ears....Lalalala,

Conservativism has always been a cancer that held humanity back as it demands that we stay in the dark past.

Who said anything about cutting off funding? They are in panic mode because Trump cleaned the books off with Obama propaganda on junk science.

.

For years they kept telling us that "the science is settled". If that were true then why would they need more money?

The science is settled. Increase GHGs, and you warm the surface of the planet. Now what that will do to our economies, agriculture and infrastructure, we really don't know yet. We have not been down this road before. Dr. Francis in 2012 made predictions as to what the effects of the loss in Arctic Sea Ice would be. Now we are seeing those predictions coming true as we see intense winter storms in the interior of the Northern Continents while at the same time we are seeing very warm periods in the Arctic Ocean. Periods so warm that there was even minor ice melt in the midst of the polar night.

Yes, we need considerable more research. Research on the melt of the permafrost, research on the ocean clathrates, research on local and regional rates of sea level rise.

Aha :Now we are seeing those predictions coming true as we see intense winter storms in the interior of the Northern Continents
First the disciples of prophet Moses the second foretold that snow in these regions will be a thing of the past. Soon after it snowed in the Sahara which angered the prophet so he threw down his (hockey) stick and it turned into a snake. But the snake turned out to be a fake and nothing happened. Then the prophecy continued that the ocean ate up the snake and then the ocean will eat us. Even Moses was more accurate with his predictions and he never pretended that they were based on science. This occult will have a much better chance as a minority religion to get funding in the form of tax exempt donations from big oil rather than from the public that wants to drain the swamp instead of turning it into permafrost.

 

[Wyatt earp]

lol......talk about a waste of time.

Hey last thing they want to have to do is work at Walmart.


.

 

[Crick]

Like Water Vapor.. One of those pesky things that keep kicking you alarmists in the ass because you still don't know how to model it.

Your statement implies that you do [know how to model it]. Please, Mr Physicist, tell us what mistake the world's climate modelers are making in their attempts to model the behavior of water vapor.

 

[Old Rocks]

lol......talk about a waste of time.

Hey last thing they want to have to do is work at Walmart.


.

That is left for fools like you. If the jobs for real scientists dry up in the US due to Lysenkoism, they will get jobs elsewhere. There are plenty of nations that would like to have some of our top scientists. China has already taken our place as the leading nation with new patents. A bit more of the foolishness that you followers of the orange clown push, and they will lead in all science, period.

 

[Wyatt earp]

lol......talk about a waste of time.

Hey last thing they want to have to do is work at Walmart.


.

That is left for fools like you. If the jobs for real scientists dry up in the US due to Lysenkoism, they will get jobs elsewhere. There are plenty of nations that would like to have some of our top scientists. China has already taken our place as the leading nation with new patents. A bit more of the foolishness that you followers of the orange clown push, and they will lead in all science, period.

As long as we can still drive these I am good

 

[Old Rocks]

That is your privilege. And your privilege to pay for the fuel for that rig.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I think we should get subsidies in our fuel cost.
It's only fair.


.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Fascism always needs to silence and shut up things that they don't like...Can't stand up to what the research and data says...So hell, lets cut its funding off and put our fingers in our ears....Lalalala,

Conservativism has always been a cancer that held humanity back as it demands that we stay in the dark past.

You are not a conservative.

So what is your excuse for being so ignorant and intellectually lazy ?

 

[Old Rocks]

I think we should get subsidies in our fuel cost.
It's only fair.


.

Why sure, about a 50% surtax on all your fuel for beating up the roads with such a hog.

 

[jc456]

Sheesh. Where do all of the people get the time for all of these marches? No jobs? Nothing better to do? Attention seekers?

paid for by Soros

I am curious though as to how these boobs actually receive their money. They don't punch a clock, they don't swipe a badge to show they were there, so how is it these goof balls get paid? We know they are because there'd be no reason otherwise to be there. Waters from Fox went and interviewed some and they didn't even know why they were even protesting. funny shit I have to say. loot and pollute, it is the leftist new policy.

You dumb ass. I know many scientists that also teach. They put in more hours than most workers do. For they not only have their class time, but have to be there so many hours a day for helping the students understand the lesson. And most have some kind of research that they are also doing.

Many climate scientists also work in challenging environments, such as Dr. Richard Alley has done in the past.

what the fk are you discussing with me from my post? did you read the post that I responded to at alllllllllllllll?

 

[jc456]

I think we should get subsidies in our fuel cost.
It's only fair.


.

Why sure, about a 50% surtax on all your fuel for beating up the roads with such a hog.

we already pay that.