Scientist Proves Democrats Favor Killing People

[PoliticalChic]

Unless you are an expert in this topic I honestly don't want to see you do anything with it.

Are you a medical expert?

I am an expert......and provided a dozen linked, sourced and documented supports for what I say.


Now.....who'd you vote for?????????

 

[Billo_Really]

Gee.....what a shocker: a dolt like you believes in the hoax.



For more than 50 years Climate Alarmists in the scientific community and environmental movement have not gotten even one prediction correct, but they do have a perfect record of getting 41 predictions wrong.

LIST OF DOOMSDAY PREDICTIONS THE CLIMATE ALARMIST GOT WRONG

Here is the source for numbers 1-27. As you will see, the individual sources are not crackpots, but scientific studies and media reports on “expert” predictions. The sources for numbers 28-41 are linked individually.

1. 1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
2. 1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 (1969)
3. 1970: Ice Age By 2000
4. 1970: America Subject to Water Rationing By 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
5. 1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
6. 1972: New Ice Age By 2070
7. 1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
8. 1974: Another Ice Age?
9. 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life
10. 1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
11. 1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes
12. 1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend
13. 1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
14. 1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
15. 1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
16. 1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
17. 1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
18. 2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
19. 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
20. 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
21. 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
22. 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
23. 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
24. 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
25. 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
26. 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
27. 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’
28. 1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
29. 1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources
30. 1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
31. 1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
32. 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s
33. 1980: Peak Oil In 2000
34. 1996: Peak Oil in 2020
35. 2002: Peak Oil in 2010
36. 2006: Super Hurricanes!
37. 2005: Manhattan Underwater by 2015
38. 1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
39. 1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
40. 1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
41. 1970s: Killer Bees!

Sorry, Experts… Sorry, Scientific Consensus… Only a fool comes running for the 42nd cry of wolf.

Mark Simone





Can I guess who you voted for, you fool??????????????

The hoax that gravity plays no role in plain crashes?

 

[abu afak]

THIS ASININE OP/THREAD ('DEMS FAVOR KILLING PEOPLE') IS A DEMO OF HOW BIASED, SICK, AND INCOMPETENT MODERATION HERE IS.
HYPER-PARTISAN OP IDIOCY LIKE THIS WOULD NORMALLY BE IMMEDIATELY MOVED TO THE RUBBER ROOM ETC EVEN FROM THE POLITICAL SECTIONS, MUCH LESS HERE IN A SCIENCE SECTION.
THE MODS ARE HERE BUT HAVE REFUSED TWO REQUESTS TO DO SO.

WELCOME TO USMB WHERE THE MODS ARE ALSO RW TROLLS. PROBABLY Meister.

TRY STARTING A THREAD WITH THE WORD 'REPUBLICAN' INSTEAD OF DEMOCRAT WITH EVEN BETTER (WARMING DENIER) EVIDENCE.

`

 

[PoliticalChic]

The hoax that gravity plays no role in plain crashes?

You should be embarrassed.

 

[Billo_Really]

You should be embarrassed.

Hey, papa was a rolling stone. And wherever he laid his hat, was his home...

 

[Paracetamol63]

I am an expert

In what area? Surely you have an area of expertise?

......and provided a dozen linked, sourced and documented supports for what I say.

Most of what you provided were new sources, not science sources.

Now.....who'd you vote for?????????

I thought you were a scientist, why does who someone voted for matter?

 

[Paracetamol63]

The media tells you it is the majority because any information they do not like has been censored.

Unfortunately you don't have any actual evidence of that. As per usual all you have are conspiracy theories.

That fact has been proven.

Yes, AGW is real.

The media has lied about nearly everything for7 fucking years. Covid is no different. Wise up guy.

Are you in the habit of putting other people's health at risk by loudly espousing your NON-MEDICAL opinion?

 

[PoliticalChic]

In what area? Surely you have an area of expertise?



Most of what you provided were new sources, not science sources.



I thought you were a scientist, why does who someone voted for matter?

You've ducked three questions that I've asked you.

Time for you to get lost.

 

[Paracetamol63]

You've ducked three questions that I've asked you.

Time for you to get lost.

You have ducked my question as well.

I will assume you are NOT an expert, medical or scientific.

Thank you.

 

[Lastamender]

Unfortunately you don't have any actual evidence of that. As per usual all you have are conspiracy theories.



Yes, AGW is real.



Are you in the habit of putting other people's health at risk by loudly espousing your NON-MEDICAL opinion?

You have no actual evidence the vaccine is effective.

 

[Paracetamol63]

You have no actual evidence the vaccine is effective.

Unfortunately I do. ANd it comes from actual medical experts.

"Hence, continuation of precautionary measures, genomic surveillance and vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of spread, early identification of variants, prevention of mutations and viral replication, respectively." HERE


"It is imperative to dispel any ambiguity about how vaccine efficacy shown in trials translates into protecting individuals and populations. The mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were shown to have 94–95% efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19, calculated as 100 × (1 minus the attack rate with vaccine divided by the attack rate with placebo). " HERE


Until you can prove to me that YOU are more qualified than the various doctors and healthcare experts who penned these articles and who reviewed them I will sadly be ignoring what you recommend.

 

[Lastamender]

Unfortunately I do. ANd it comes from actual medical experts.

"Hence, continuation of precautionary measures, genomic surveillance and vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of spread, early identification of variants, prevention of mutations and viral replication, respectively." HERE


"It is imperative to dispel any ambiguity about how vaccine efficacy shown in trials translates into protecting individuals and populations. The mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were shown to have 94–95% efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19, calculated as 100 × (1 minus the attack rate with vaccine divided by the attack rate with placebo). " HERE


Until you can prove to me that YOU are more qualified than the various doctors and healthcare experts who penned these articles and who reviewed them I will sadly be ignoring what you recommend.

And medical experts also say it does far more damage than good. They have just as many degrees and published papers. Any good doctor welcomes a second opinion.

 

[Lastamender]

Covid Vaccines Up to 100 Times More Likely to Cause Serious Injury to a Young Adult Than Prevent It, Say Top Scientists – The Daily Sceptic

The Covid vaccines are up to 100 times more likely to cause a young adult serious injury than prevent him or her from being hospitalised with Covid, a study has concluded.

dailysceptic.org

 

[Paracetamol63]

And medical experts also say it does far more damage than good. They have just as many degrees and published papers. Any good doctor welcomes a second opinion.

Unfortunately YOU are not the one to give that "second opinion".

I honestly can't stress enough how dangerous I think it is for people who have no medical training to go around and tell others that the doctors are wrong.

Do you ever think that maybe you might be wrong? What if someone takes your wrong advice and dies? How do you think you would feel then? Anything?

 

[Lastamender]

Unfortunately YOU are not the one to give that "second opinion".

I honestly can't stress enough how dangerous I think it is for people who have no medical training to go around and tell others that the doctors are wrong.

Do you ever think that maybe you might be wrong? What if someone takes your wrong advice and dies? How do you think you would feel then? Anything?

It is not me giving the opinion, it is other doctors. Again, with degrees up the ass. The vaccine is a killer and you are an enabler.

 

[jc456]

1. If you are a power-hungry Democrat, you work day and night to impose all sorts of restrictions to fight "global warming."
To be clear, the Left argues that global warming is an ever-increasing phenomenon, while the Right....the truth....is that it is a cycle: at earlier times it has been far warmer globally- they once grew millet in Scandanavia.


2. If the Left wins the arguament and the concomitant power, thousands will die that didn't have to. Who says so???



3.

No way!!!!

 

[jc456]

Unfortunately YOU are not the one to give that "second opinion".

I honestly can't stress enough how dangerous I think it is for people who have no medical training to go around and tell others that the doctors are wrong.

Do you ever think that maybe you might be wrong? What if someone takes your wrong advice and dies? How do you think you would feel then? Anything?

Cdc and dr Birx said so publicly, therefore, the conclusion can only be fauci was too!!

Which then means every doctor pushing it is wrong. Wow, that’s really simple

 

[Paracetamol63]

Cdc and dr Birx said so publicly, therefore, the conclusion can only be fauci was too!!

Which then means every doctor pushing it is wrong. Wow, that’s really simple

What if the doctors are correct and you are wrong?

Do you ever wonder if what you say in public might be used by someone to make a decision that isn't good and you are to blame?

 

[Paracetamol63]

It is not me giving the opinion, it is other doctors. Again, with degrees up the ass. The vaccine is a killer and you are an enabler.

I can live with my choices.

Can you live with yours?

 

[jc456]

What if the doctors are correct and you are wrong?

Do you ever wonder if what you say in public might be used by someone to make a decision that isn't good and you are to blame?

I do research, doctors most often deal with big pharma! It’s sad you think doctors don’t have difference of opinions