Scientist express horror as they see a 2.5 C increase in earth's temperature

We have been seeing your hyperbolic forecasts for decades and are still waiting. "You've" been shouting WOLF for so long it now rings on deaf years.

Basil%20-%20the%20sky%20is%20falling%20down.jpg

We're relying on 18th Century temperature readings worldwide being accurate to a tenth of a degree ... I've dropped acid on the Berkeley campus, looks like a lot of people have ...

We measure temperatures to the nearest whole degree ... therefore our averages are only accurate to that nearest whole degree ... how to read a scientific instrument is taught in high school laboratory classes ...

Cry wolf ...
 
We have been seeing your hyperbolic forecasts for decades and are still waiting. "You've" been shouting WOLF for so long it now rings on deaf years.

Basil%20-%20the%20sky%20is%20falling%20down.jpg
You really have trouble seeing past the end of your nose. How can you see years ahead. FOX News has rotted your brain.
 
As you know, Professor Phil Jones was the center of the Global Warming Scam at East Anglia University. Their program was considered the epitome of Global Warming Information. The disclosure of thousands of e-mails proving their efforts to conceal information discredit and even prevent opposing views from being published has wrecked the scam, hopefully forever. Data used by the United Nations IPCC and NASA findings came from EAU.

14th February, 2010

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing (it has now been disclosed that all the “raw data” was DUMPED!

There has been no global warming since 1995

Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes


Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be.

WHAT????

[…]

Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.


Phil Jones has said that he considered suicide for his part in this worldwide scam.

Let us also recall: The e-mails leaked in the fall of 2009 allow us to trace the machinations of a small but influential band of British and US climate scientists who played the lead role in the IPCC reports. It appears that this group, which controlled access to basic temperature data, was able to produce a "warming" by manipulating the analysis of the data, but refused to share information on the basic data or details of their analysis with independent scientists who requested them -- in violation of Freedom of Information laws. In fact, they went so far as to keep any dissenting views from being published -- by monopolizing the peer-review process, aided by ideologically cooperative editors of prestigious journals, like Science and Nature.

We learn from the e-mails that the ClimateGate gang was able to "hide the decline" [of global temperature] by applying what they termed as "tricks," and that they intimidated editors and forced out those judged to be "uncooperative." No doubt, thorough investigations, now in progress or planned, will disclose the full range of their nefarious activities. But it is clear that this small cabal was able to convince much of the world that climate disasters were impending -- unless drastic steps were taken. Not only were most of the media, public, and politicians misled, but so were many scientists, national academies of science, and professional organizations -- and even the Norwegian committee that awarded the 2007 Peace Prize to the IPCC and Al Gore, the chief apostle of climate alarmism.

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

Hide the decline!
 
Show us a source that says you've correctly identified the baseline. What's wrong with you? Did you actually think that was going to fly?

LOL, it is right there on the chart, and it is from Berkely Earth website.

You are that clueless apparently.
 
The IPCC's baseline is the average from 1850-1900 due to the quality of that data vs older stuff. Your 2C is not being measured from that base.

LOL, it is right there on the chart, and it is from Berkely Earth website.

You are that clueless apparently.

The IPCC isn't a data base center, and you didn't try to show any errors on Berkely Earth.

Epic Fail on your part.
 
The IPCC's baseline is the average from 1850-1900 due to the quality of that data vs older stuff. Your 2C is not being measured from that base.
What was the average ocean temperature in 1900?

700m deep Indian Ocean = ?

surface of Atlantic =?

See how we can pick ANY NUMBERS we want to make a Bernie Madoff dataset?

Are you “measuring ” the temperature the world over in a given date and time??
 
What was the average ocean temperature in 1900?

700m deep Indian Ocean = ?

surface of Atlantic =?

See how we can pick ANY NUMBERS we want to make a Bernie Madoff dataset?

Are you “measuring ” the temperature the world over in a given date and time??

The important thing is, Crick says the temperature increase in the last ten years was
the fastest increase in the last 3 million years.
 
LOL, it is right there on the chart, and it is from Berkely Earth website.

You are that clueless apparently.

The IPCC isn't a data base center, and you didn't try to show any errors on Berkely Earth.

Epic Fail on your part.
My statement - your error, was to suggest that the level of global warming has already hit 2C because contemporary temperatures are 2C above a singular low. The IPCC's measurement of current global warming uses as a baseline the average temperature between 1850 and 1900. So, you're full of shit, as usual and unwilling to admit it, as always.
 
That sounds more like an entirely reasonable explanation to a technically lacking newperson. And I'd hardly term her reaction "laughing in his face". That you thought what you thought indicates you're at least as technically lacking as was Ms Brennan.
Thank you for your insight
 

Forum List

Back
Top