Science moves closer to biblical creation.

The gods will save mankind by destroying mankind?
The end time 'tribulation' is manmade. We are going to bring it upon ourselves. God is involved as it is the violation of his laws that will bring it to pass. He need not be directly involved.

Walk too close to the edge and you are at risk of God's law of gravity,
 
The end time 'tribulation' is manmade. We are going to bring it upon ourselves. God is involved as it is the violation of his laws that will bring it to pass. He need not be directly involved.

Walk too close to the edge and you are at risk of God's law of gravity,
You just made the gods irrelevant.
 
I wouldn't have replied at all if I were truly unwilling to think about it. I just think you're wrong.
Even Einstein couldn't find c²=m/e accurate so had to introduce a huge fudge factor. The c² term being a constant is all that's significant. m/e is rendered directly proportional, i.e., energy equals mass times some constant. It doesn't explain your notion of quantum entanglement because there's no space in counterspace for energy to travel through period, let alone over time. It's longitudinal, i.e. instantaneous. But please do supply a link to anything supporting the notion of entanglements depending upon a "3 minutes" constant.
Links Are Part of a Chain. Break Out of Them.

Einstein stumbled upon this velocity, even though the dogma is that it can't exist in this limited universe. So he denied that it was the formula of a collision, as in a two-ton vehicle traveling at 100 mph hits a wall with a force expressed by the multiplication of those two factors. But it's too much of a coincidence to be anything other than that. If physicists, who are narrow-minded conformists, would dare to try to come up with a way to investigate the first collision after fission, they would discover what is theoretically impossible: that the particle was going at the square of the speed that is supposed to be the maximum velocity. So the theory is wrong. All collisions after the first are slowed down by it.

Anyway, the break-up of the Strong Force is the real energy here. True to their sniveling character, Educated Eunuchs shy away from focusing on that. Like c² being too fast, the Strong Force is also too strong to exist in this universe, so it must transmit its strength at the interface between universes.

You're begging the question by assuming that the outside universe is linear, supposing that it is merely an array of projections from points in 3D. That assumption is probably where nonsense like String Theory comes from.
 
Small potatoes vs. the numbers killed by the gods.
God does have to orchestrate mercy killings from time to time. There have been many since the flood. He also allows war to kill millions on either side, but he decides the winner, especially if it involves the descendants of Israel.
 
Last edited:
God does have to orchestrate mercy killings from time to time. There have been many since the flood. He also allows war to kill millions on either side, but he decides the winner, especially if it involves the descendants of Israel.
The gods do mercy killings? He allows wars?

I think you’re in a really dark place.
 
If physicists, who are narrow-minded conformists, would dare to try to come up with a way to investigate the first collision after fission, they would discover what is theoretically impossible: that the particle was going at the square of the speed that is supposed to be the maximum velocity.
Presume I'm such a physicist from Missouri. Show me.. something!..
 
You're begging the question by assuming that the outside universe is linear, supposing that it is merely an array of projections from points in 3D.
I am a devout subscriber to K.I.S.S. theory, which btw would clearly never support string theory. I'm also neither presuming nor promoting a linear universe. However, I do still allow for the possibility. Believe what you will.
 
Einstein stumbled upon this velocity, even though the dogma is that it can't exist in this limited universe. So he denied that it was the formula of a collision, as in a two-ton vehicle traveling at 100 mph hits a wall with a force expressed by the multiplication of those two factors. But it's too much of a coincidence to be anything other than that.
This is simply all wrong. The units worked out so Einstein ran with it is all. {Actually Maxwell derived the equation first, IIRC, but Einstein correctly embellished upon its significance before going nuts and denying the Aether.} Anyway, c has the units of velocity while c squared has units of velocity squared. Show me where Einstein ever denied that force x distance yielded work or energy "as in a two-ton vehicle traveling at 100 mph hits a wall with a force expressed by the multiplication of those two factors"? The "force" is actually one of your "two factors" -- "two-ton." Collisions require vector considerations. Say two cars of the same mass, travelling in directly opposite directions, collide elastically. They now both have zero velocity and momentum, the energy being dissipated as heat. If they collided inelastically they would simply bounce off, now travelling in the opposite direction at their original speed. Under no circumstances does a squaring of the speed or "velocity" result, even in QM.
 
Last edited:
And finally,
You're begging the question by assuming that the outside universe is linear, supposing that it is merely an array of projections from points in 3D.
No, I do not assume that whatsoever. Quite the opposite. I presume our universe to be nonlinear and any "outside universe" to be as well. In no way can counterspace be envisioned simply as "an array of projections from points in 3D." That's just ridiculous.
 
Eric Dollard:
The velocity at which light propagates, the luminal velocity, c, is a property of the dielectric itself, be it aether, or 10-C oil. This velocity has no relation to the motion of the transmitter itself, nor are its transmitted waves material projections. Nothing is “shot” out of the moving laser. The electric field can only “soak into the medium” at the rate defined by that medium. Light can only travel at luminal velocity as defined by the dielectric medium and its dimensional relation of one over c square, a numeric constant. Light is not a material projection, it is an inductive process, a process of the aether.
 
The "force" is actually one of your "two factors" -- "two-ton." Collisions require vector considerations. Say two cars of the same mass, travelling in directly opposite directions, collide elastically. They now both have zero velocity and momentum, the energy being dissipated as heat. If they collided inelastically they would simply bounce off, now travelling in the opposite direction at their original speed. Under no circumstances does a squaring of the speed or "velocity" result, even in QM
I'm not sure what the physics of QM may lead to. What did e=mc2 lead to? It led to the first engine that could be used in bicycles and autos and other machines, but it also led to the h-bomb. Will it lead to something that could blow up the world? It's just in our nature unless God can stop/help us.
 
Back
Top Bottom