Science In Need Of Context

[Hollie]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

What Darwin and approximately two centuries of research and discovery accomplished since his work are not taught at the JImmy Swaggert madrassah.

See how much you missed?

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

 

[Dusty]

I don’t read your posts unless they’re at least 10,000 words long.
This one fell a bit short

Of course you do.


You just can't find any way to disprove them.

Again if you were not so seriously mentally challenged you could understand the concept that no one cares about you enough to even want to disprove you.

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

Darwin owns your brain

Very sad

So there was nothing in the post that you could dispute?


And that's as far as what passes for thinking from your sort, allows?


Very sad.

I know that your delusional mind tells you that people read your nonsense. They and I do not.

PS The last 13 years that you have spent here have achieved nothing, you make the same lame arguments now as you did then

Of course you read,...and are discomforted, by these posts.

I suggest you do not read the next one, as it will put you in your place, and be even more discomforting when you realize you have no way to dispute same.

Again Darwin rules your tormented existence, he always will, and when you are dead he will still be Darwin when no one remembers your name

When the asteroid hits the earth, it will be as if Darwin never existed.

Rather pointless as biological evolution is a fact with or without Darwin.

Evolution is a complicated DNA based process. Without DNA there can be no evolution, and nothing about DNA popping out of a pond one day qualifies as science

What is this weird fascination some people have with DNA and ponds?

How did the gods magically make DNA pop out as a result of snapping their supernatural fingers?

How do you believe and quote science and actually say that something came from nothing? LOL even if evolution happens you still can not account for a chicken hatching from an egg. But try as you will, you are very entertaining

You make a mistake typical of the uninformed in not understanding that a biological evolution does not address abiogenesis. We know with 100% certainty that abiogenesis, (the beginning of biological life), occurred because life exists.

You might want to study the matters you attempt to argue against.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

 

[Dusty]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

What Darwin and approximately two centuries of research and discovery accomplished since his work are not taught at the JImmy Swaggert madrassah.

See how much you missed?

So why is life not creating itself on the Earth today?

Answer, because God is not here to create life, nor does he need to be because he designed evolution

 

[Dusty]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Chiki, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Stop begging.

OK....you can try again:

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?

 

[Hollie]

I don’t read your posts unless they’re at least 10,000 words long.
This one fell a bit short

Of course you do.


You just can't find any way to disprove them.

Again if you were not so seriously mentally challenged you could understand the concept that no one cares about you enough to even want to disprove you.

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

Darwin owns your brain

Very sad

So there was nothing in the post that you could dispute?


And that's as far as what passes for thinking from your sort, allows?


Very sad.

I know that your delusional mind tells you that people read your nonsense. They and I do not.

PS The last 13 years that you have spent here have achieved nothing, you make the same lame arguments now as you did then

Of course you read,...and are discomforted, by these posts.

I suggest you do not read the next one, as it will put you in your place, and be even more discomforting when you realize you have no way to dispute same.

Again Darwin rules your tormented existence, he always will, and when you are dead he will still be Darwin when no one remembers your name

When the asteroid hits the earth, it will be as if Darwin never existed.

Rather pointless as biological evolution is a fact with or without Darwin.

Evolution is a complicated DNA based process. Without DNA there can be no evolution, and nothing about DNA popping out of a pond one day qualifies as science

What is this weird fascination some people have with DNA and ponds?

How did the gods magically make DNA pop out as a result of snapping their supernatural fingers?

How do you believe and quote science and actually say that something came from nothing? LOL even if evolution happens you still can not account for a chicken hatching from an egg. But try as you will, you are very entertaining

You make a mistake typical of the uninformed in not understanding that a biological evolution does not address abiogenesis. We know with 100% certainty that abiogenesis, (the beginning of biological life), occurred because life exists.

You might want to study the matters you attempt to argue against.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looking around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

It’s remarkable how those inti-science types are are so often the least informed about science. The ''life in a warm pond'' slogan is one common among the Henry Morris worshippers. I see that misrepresented slogan routinely from the science loathing. I've noted before that those revile science and argue against it should first make an attempt to understand what they're arguing against. At no point in his published works or correspondence, (as far as I am aware), did Darwin address the origins of life. Darwin's theories addressed only the origins of species, of adaptations, and the distribution of organisms around the world.

For your edification, the ''warm pond'' slogan so often used by the ID'iot creationers is another fraud they use to denigrate science. The slogan was traced back to a letter Darwin wrote to his longstanding friend, Joseph Hooker, on 1 February 1871:

“It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present. But if (and oh! what a big if!) we could conceive some warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity, &c. present, that a proteine [sic] compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.” [quoted from Janet Browne's The Power of Place, New York, Knopf, 2002, 392f]

 

[Hollie]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

 

[Dusty]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

 

[Hollie]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

 

[Dusty]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

 

[Hollie]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

 

[Dusty]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

Darwin referenced a pond, so you are quite wrong. In fact your ignorance pretty much demonstrates well, your ignorance.

That said you clearly need a lesson in Darwinism

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote a now famous letter to Joseph Hooker which included some of his speculations on the spontaneous generation of life in some - warm little pond.

The letter was mailed to Hooker on February 1st, 1871.

Down,Beckenham, Kent, S.E.
My dear Hooker,

... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present.

But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL now who is the stupid one Dolly

 

[Hollie]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

Darwin referenced a pond, so you are quite wrong. In fact your ignorance pretty much demonstrates well, your ignorance.

That said you clearly need a lesson in Darwinism

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote a now famous letter to Joseph Hooker which included some of his speculations on the spontaneous generation of life in some - warm little pond.

The letter was mailed to Hooker on February 1st, 1871.

Down,Beckenham, Kent, S.E.
My dear Hooker,

... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present.

But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL now who is the stupid one Dolly

You cut and pasted what I provided for you earlier.

That’s odd because Darwin never suggested life emerged from a pond as you tried to suggest.

Name-calling won’t help you.

So, in connection with your space alien conspiracy theory, have you ever been abducted and maybe, you know, probed or anything?

 

[Dusty]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

Darwin referenced a pond, so you are quite wrong. In fact your ignorance pretty much demonstrates well, your ignorance.

That said you clearly need a lesson in Darwinism

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote a now famous letter to Joseph Hooker which included some of his speculations on the spontaneous generation of life in some - warm little pond.

The letter was mailed to Hooker on February 1st, 1871.

Down,Beckenham, Kent, S.E.
My dear Hooker,

... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present.

But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL now who is the stupid one Dolly

You cut and pasted what I provided for you earlier.

That’s odd because Darwin never suggested life emerged from a pond as you tried to suggest.

Name-calling won’t help you.

So, in connection with your space alien conspiracy theory, have you ever been abducted and maybe, you know, probed or anything?

Again Dolly Darwin believed that life was conceived in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL you had no clue as to what Darwin actually believed, and when confronted with what Darwin said all you can claim is that he never said it.

He did say it and believed that life concieved itself in a pond.

So have you concieved anything yet Dolly? other than ignorance I mean

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

Darwin referenced a pond, so you are quite wrong. In fact your ignorance pretty much demonstrates well, your ignorance.

That said you clearly need a lesson in Darwinism

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote a now famous letter to Joseph Hooker which included some of his speculations on the spontaneous generation of life in some - warm little pond.

The letter was mailed to Hooker on February 1st, 1871.

Down,Beckenham, Kent, S.E.
My dear Hooker,

... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present.

But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL now who is the stupid one Dolly

You cut and pasted what I provided for you earlier.

That’s odd because Darwin never suggested life emerged from a pond as you tried to suggest.

Name-calling won’t help you.

So, in connection with your space alien conspiracy theory, have you ever been abducted and maybe, you know, probed or anything?

Again Dolly Darwin believed that life was conceived in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL you had no clue as to what Darwin actually believed, and when confronted with what Darwin said all you can claim is that he never said it.

He did say it and believed that life concieved itself in a pond.

So have you concieved anything yet Dolly? other than ignorance I mean

Not Darwin.


Harold Urey.


Do you know the products he found in the soup that resulted from water, hydrogen, ammonia and methane?
You didn't do well in organic chemistry, did you?

 

[Dusty]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

Darwin referenced a pond, so you are quite wrong. In fact your ignorance pretty much demonstrates well, your ignorance.

That said you clearly need a lesson in Darwinism

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote a now famous letter to Joseph Hooker which included some of his speculations on the spontaneous generation of life in some - warm little pond.

The letter was mailed to Hooker on February 1st, 1871.

Down,Beckenham, Kent, S.E.
My dear Hooker,

... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present.

But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL now who is the stupid one Dolly

You cut and pasted what I provided for you earlier.

That’s odd because Darwin never suggested life emerged from a pond as you tried to suggest.

Name-calling won’t help you.

So, in connection with your space alien conspiracy theory, have you ever been abducted and maybe, you know, probed or anything?

Again Dolly Darwin believed that life was conceived in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL you had no clue as to what Darwin actually believed, and when confronted with what Darwin said all you can claim is that he never said it.

He did say it and believed that life concieved itself in a pond.

So have you concieved anything yet Dolly? other than ignorance I mean

Not Darwin.


Harold Urey.


Do you know the products he found in the soup that resulted from water, hydrogen, ammonia and methane?
You didn't do well in organic chemistry, did you?

Darwin wrote about the pond to Hooker. All this time and you still have no clue

"But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity etcetera present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes [..] "


~Charles Darwin, in a letter to Joseph Hooker (1871)

 

[Hollie]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

Darwin referenced a pond, so you are quite wrong. In fact your ignorance pretty much demonstrates well, your ignorance.

That said you clearly need a lesson in Darwinism

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote a now famous letter to Joseph Hooker which included some of his speculations on the spontaneous generation of life in some - warm little pond.

The letter was mailed to Hooker on February 1st, 1871.

Down,Beckenham, Kent, S.E.
My dear Hooker,

... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present.

But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL now who is the stupid one Dolly

You cut and pasted what I provided for you earlier.

That’s odd because Darwin never suggested life emerged from a pond as you tried to suggest.

Name-calling won’t help you.

So, in connection with your space alien conspiracy theory, have you ever been abducted and maybe, you know, probed or anything?

Again Dolly Darwin believed that life was conceived in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL you had no clue as to what Darwin actually believed, and when confronted with what Darwin said all you can claim is that he never said it.

He did say it and believed that life concieved itself in a pond.

So have you concieved anything yet Dolly? other than ignorance I mean

Darwin never claimed life began in a pond. Try paying attention.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

Darwin referenced a pond, so you are quite wrong. In fact your ignorance pretty much demonstrates well, your ignorance.

That said you clearly need a lesson in Darwinism

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote a now famous letter to Joseph Hooker which included some of his speculations on the spontaneous generation of life in some - warm little pond.

The letter was mailed to Hooker on February 1st, 1871.

Down,Beckenham, Kent, S.E.
My dear Hooker,

... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present.

But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL now who is the stupid one Dolly

You cut and pasted what I provided for you earlier.

That’s odd because Darwin never suggested life emerged from a pond as you tried to suggest.

Name-calling won’t help you.

So, in connection with your space alien conspiracy theory, have you ever been abducted and maybe, you know, probed or anything?

Again Dolly Darwin believed that life was conceived in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL you had no clue as to what Darwin actually believed, and when confronted with what Darwin said all you can claim is that he never said it.

He did say it and believed that life concieved itself in a pond.

So have you concieved anything yet Dolly? other than ignorance I mean

Not Darwin.


Harold Urey.


Do you know the products he found in the soup that resulted from water, hydrogen, ammonia and methane?
You didn't do well in organic chemistry, did you?

Darwin wrote about the pond to Hooker. All this time and you still have no clue

"But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity etcetera present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes [..] "


~Charles Darwin, in a letter to Joseph Hooker (1871)

I'm here to help:












View all


The Miller–Urey experiment (or Miller experiment) was a chemical experiment that simulated the conditions thought at the time (1952) to be present on the early Earth and tested the chemical origin of life under those conditions.

Miller–Urey experiment - Wikipedia​

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Miller–Urey_experiment

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.In light of the Wuhan/Mask/Lockdown Hoax being exposed, this appears to be an opportune time to remind all of one simple rule: Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..you should know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
You should have learned from the finest President in a hundred years:
Trust, but verify.


View attachment 491570



2. I admit to a certain....frisson...in being barraged by Darwin-believers who claim science as their cause, but fail to see that Darwinism fails as science. It remains unproven, even its popularizers pretend it isn't what it, and any criticism is met with emotion rather than discussion....hardly a scientific method.

Just like that mask thing.



3. Today is the anniversary of sorts of the most famous popularizer of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, the day he passed on.

Stephen Jay Gould, (born September 10, 1941, New York, New York, U.S.—died May 20, 2002, New York), American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and science writer.
…Gould became widely known as a writer, polemicist, and popularizer of evolutionary theory.
Britannica.com

No where in the article is the most important aspect of Gould’s views mentioned: Marxism.
If you are a government school grad, you were taught to ignore it, too.




3. Marxism is the context. Suddenly, it become clear why certain individuals push Darwin’s Theory and abjure any religious view.

" The Socialist Worker Online mentions that Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School.
... Gould was on the advisory boards of the journal Rethinking Marxism and the Brecht Forum, sponsor of the New York Marxist School, which was dedicated to using "Marx's uniquely valuable contributions…to study conditions today and possibilities for transcending capitalism and building an emancipatory society."
Gasper, Phil, ‘A scientist of the people’, Socialist Worker Online, 7 June 2002, p8



4. A famous quote made by Gould is that within his Jewish-Marxist family subculture he learned his Marxism ‘at his daddy's knee’. He has said that his politics were very different from his father’s, but never explained exactly how. Some have speculated that this referred to a rejection of Stalinism. Whatever the meaning, it is clear from Gould’s work that he was strongly influenced by Marxist beliefs. In his book The Culture of Critique, evolutionist author Kevin MacDonald writes that Gould has ‘acknowledged that his theory of evolution as punctuated equilibria was attractive to him as a Marxist because it posited periodic revolutionary upheavals in evolution rather than conservative, gradualist change’
MacDonald, Kevin, ‘The Culture of Critique’



5. Stephen Jay Gould ultimately may not have been an atheist or a Marxist, but nearly his whole life argues in favor of both positions.

One an only conjecture as to why mention of his Marxist views never seem to get mentioned.

Could it be ‘context’?

This thread does not belong in the science section. Conspiracy Theory or Rubber R

“He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)


And this thread proves the explanation for the reason teaches Darwinism as though it had been proven.

That's context.

There you go again expressing your Darwin compulsion.

Darwin rules your world

Darwin is dead ------ do you really think he cares at this point?

Darwin is the only thing living in chic's mind

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


You don't know, do you?

Darwin's greatest accomplishment is turning people like you into paranoid schizzos, constantly babbling for decades the same krap.

You do know that there is nothing to win here right?

What is it that Darwin accomplished that caused your infatuation?


I won by proving that your sort, the indoctrinated, doesn't have a clue.

What did you win? I mean other than another bottle of pills from one of your doctors

I proved that you know nothing about Darwin, but have been taught to bow the neck and bend the knee in obedience to your masters.

OK Hollie, you proved something. Submit the proof for peer review.

Just remember to take all your pills as directed

Wrong poster, sweetie.

You both need the same meds.

A rather embarrassing retreat on your part.

Don’t bring a knife bible to a gun science fight.

First of all Hollie there is no "we" that you referred too, because most of humanity believes in one God or another. Now your argument is actually that we know that life created itself in Darwins pond because life is here.

Hollie, please pay attention to the real news, because aliens are here in some form, looping around F-18's, and they did not come from Darwins pond. How is this relevant? because there is no way to say that they were not here first, and or that we are not actually them, or that they did not engineer life for the Earth as humanity will soon be doing on Mars.

Next

You’re simply stuttering and mumbling about “Darwin’s pond” when there is no such thing.

Your alien conspiracy theory is fascinating. Do you spend a great deal of time reading supermarket tabloids?

Darwin referenced a pond, so you are quite wrong. In fact your ignorance pretty much demonstrates well, your ignorance.

That said you clearly need a lesson in Darwinism

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote a now famous letter to Joseph Hooker which included some of his speculations on the spontaneous generation of life in some - warm little pond.

The letter was mailed to Hooker on February 1st, 1871.

Down,Beckenham, Kent, S.E.
My dear Hooker,

... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present.

But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL now who is the stupid one Dolly

You cut and pasted what I provided for you earlier.

That’s odd because Darwin never suggested life emerged from a pond as you tried to suggest.

Name-calling won’t help you.

So, in connection with your space alien conspiracy theory, have you ever been abducted and maybe, you know, probed or anything?

Again Dolly Darwin believed that life was conceived in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

LOL you had no clue as to what Darwin actually believed, and when confronted with what Darwin said all you can claim is that he never said it.

He did say it and believed that life concieved itself in a pond.

So have you concieved anything yet Dolly? other than ignorance I mean

Not Darwin.


Harold Urey.


Do you know the products he found in the soup that resulted from water, hydrogen, ammonia and methane?
You didn't do well in organic chemistry, did you?

Darwin wrote about the pond to Hooker. All this time and you still have no clue

"But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity etcetera present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes [..] "


~Charles Darwin, in a letter to Joseph Hooker (1871)

I'm here to help:
View attachment 492331
View attachment 492333
View attachment 492330
View attachment 492332
View attachment 492328
View attachment 492329
View all


The Miller–Urey experiment (or Miller experiment) was a chemical experiment that simulated the conditions thought at the time (1952) to be present on the early Earth and tested the chemical origin of life under those conditions.

Miller–Urey experiment - Wikipedia​

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Miller–Urey_experiment

As the saying goes, Darwin was about 'survival of the fittest,' not 'arrival of the fittest.'