Seasonal timing has changed. Plants will take a little longer to evolve to make use of that change. Say, a hundred thousand years or so.
Plants need to evolve to use a few more weeks of growing season? Why do you feel that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Seasonal timing has changed. Plants will take a little longer to evolve to make use of that change. Say, a hundred thousand years or so.
where has seasonal timing changed?Seasonal timing has changed. Plants will take a little longer to evolve to make use of that change. Say, a hundred thousand years or so.
he hmmmmmm doesn't understand that plants like warm soil. no coldy soil, no die off.Seasonal timing has changed. Plants will take a little longer to evolve to make use of that change. Say, a hundred thousand years or so.
Plants need to evolve to use a few more weeks of growing season? Why do you feel that?
270 Gt/yr for the last 20 years and accelerating at 48Gt/yr/decade. Enough meltwater each year to cover the island of Ireland 3 meters deep.
Climate change: World's glaciers melting at a faster pace
The meltwater produced now accounts for about a fifth of global sea-level rise.www.bbc.com
what are you exactly?Over hundreds of millions of years - the time span required for the development of fossil fuels - a very small fraction of decaying plant matter needs to be entrapped to create the Earth's holdings. The primary difference between total CO2 emissions and what ends up in the atmosphere is that which dissolves in the world's oceans, lakes and streams. If you were under the impression that it was somehow getting buried back in the Earth, you need to find us a suitable mechanism.
When a forum practices concerns for the proffered content of its patrons , it may be worth an effort to reiterate the already made unnecessary to restate .Do you have a point? If so, you've failed to make it.
Another post to add to my collection of cowardly denier death wishes. It's surprising how often deniers descend to this and that they don't seem to notice or care what it says about them.
We need to eliminate GHG emissions. What that costs depends a great deal on you and I. I strenuously suspect that my way of doing it would cost a fraction of the manner you would end up doing it..
The most abundant Greenhouse Gas is H2O (water), and everything Organic is Carbon Based.
Kill yourself and we will all be closer to solving the problem ...
.
You've still failed to make a point... Or a syntactically valid sentence." Who Bothers Not Me Practices "
* Forced To Repeat Dumb Fuckery *
When a forum practices concerns for the proffered content of its patrons , it may be worth an effort to reiterate the already made unnecessary to restate .Do you have a point? If so, you've failed to make it.
So, if you have a point, you've
Another post to add to my collection of cowardly denier death wishes. It's surprising how often deniers descend to this and that they don't seem to notice or care what it says about them.
We need to eliminate GHG emissions. What that costs depends a great deal on you and I. I strenuously suspect that my way of doing it would cost a fraction of the manner you would end up doing it..
The most abundant Greenhouse Gas is H2O (water), and everything Organic is Carbon Based.
Kill yourself and we will all be closer to solving the problem ...
.
I thought you had me on ignoreOver hundreds of millions of years - the time span required for the development of fossil fuels - a very small fraction of decaying plant matter needs to be entrapped to create the Earth's holdings. The primary difference between total CO2 emissions and what ends up in the atmosphere is that which dissolves in the world's oceans, lakes and streams. If you were under the impression that it was somehow getting buried back in the Earth, you need to find us a suitable mechanism.
Plants remove CO2 from the atmosphere but return it when they decompose. The problem CO2 is that being removed from the ground (oil and coal) and put into the atmosphere. It does not get recycled in a timely fashion.
On the other hand, you might try actually addressing the thread topic, something you have failed to do in any of your posts here.Plants remove CO2 from the atmosphere but return it when they decompose. The problem CO2 is that being removed from the ground (oil and coal) and put into the atmosphere. It does not get recycled in a timely fashion..
Add the fact plants remove CO2 from the air, with Global Warming Hysteria, and it is nothing more than a windfall for me.
I mean I could try to be noble and talk about selling Carbon Credits with the trees ...
But the land is also sitting on top of the Haynesville Shale and I am selling the oil and natural gas as well.
However ... Environmental Ponzi Schemes are very creative and lucrative.
I could also go into detail about how manufacturers simply use Environment Policies to undercut the cost of raw materials.
They are still getting the same logs, at a reduced cost, in attempts to pretend they are punishing the loggers.
I can also say that if you manage to master their lingo, and you start telling them crap they really want to hear ...
They will pay you more money for the same damn log, and build an advertising campaign around how Environmentally Conscious they are.
.
On the other hand, you might try actually addressing the thread topic, something you have failed to do in any of your posts here.
I have yet to see you post a single word concerning satellite data showing the decline of glaciers worldwide. Please let me know if I missed something.On the other hand, you might try actually addressing the thread topic, something you have failed to do in any of your posts here..
I addressed your topic and each of your posts that I quoted.
Sorry if it wasn't what you wanted to hear, but you aren't paying me.
If you would rather me be more specific in reference to the OP:
You're out here doing the legwork peddling this crap for free.
I'm smarter than you, and you damn sure aren't as smart as the scientists, because at least they are getting paid for their efforts ...
.
I have yet to see you post a single word concerning satellite data showing the decline of glaciers worldwide. Please let me know if I missed something.
So those in the minority aren’t as smart because why? So is your position, if you don’t agree, you’re not as smart?So, as I stated, you have not addressed the lead post. Your posts are off topic for this thread. Please get on THIS gravy TRAIN or move your comments where they might actually apply.
So, as I stated, you have not addressed the lead post. Your posts are off topic for this thread. Please get on THIS gravy TRAIN or move your comments where they might actually apply.