Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 98,397
- 3,635
No, you unmitigated imbecile, she was wrong. And your links don't help you because they had to alter what she said to make her seem correct. Both links accurately point out how Revere, after inadvertently getting captured by the British, did inform them that Colonists were coming to confront them; but that's not what the Quitter from Twitter said.I'll vote for her if she runs. Poster Hazlnut called her a idiot. Look at the size of those budgets she balanced in the 10 to 12 billion dollar range. No idiot works and balances budgets like that as well as dealing with big oil companies. She is no idiot by any means.
It's reasonable to assume a person who thinks Paul Revere rode to warn the British, is an idiot.
Hey moron. Here's something for ya. Historians agree that Palin was right about Revere.
Sarah Palin Was Right About Paul Revere - US News
Historians Say Palin Was Right About Paul Revere - But they admit it begrudgingly, notes the 'Boston Herald'
That idiot said part of Revere's ride was to warn the British. That's just fucking stupid
