Sarah Palin Divorced FOX

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
The House & Senate are ripe for plucking in 2014. When you look at how the same tired old Republican gurus like Karl Rove are standing pat on a losing hand, I don’t see how Tea Party conservatives can miss picking up seats in the House and taking control of the Senate. Tea Partiers cannot miss so long as they do NOT waste time, energy, and resources looking for a presidential candidate in 2016. Establishment Republicans and the media still have the clout to pick the ticket. To be accurate the media still has enough clout to eliminate any wannabe they don’t want. That’s why Republicans like Marco Rubio are jockeying for position on issues like amnesty. He need not worry. The media wants him on the Republican ticket in 2016.

I’m happy to see that Ann Coulter is not fawning all over Rubio the way she does with another Republican party loser —— Chris Christie.

Talking about amnesty for illegal aliens Ann puts it this way:


Step One of Marco Rubio’s plan is: Grant illegal aliens the right to live and work in America legally. (Rubio’s first move in poker: Fold.)

Rubio's amnesty: A path to oblivion for GOP
Ann Coulter says senator's immigration plan amounts to 'a wolf in wolf's clothing'
Published: 17 hours ago
by ANN COULTER

Rubio?s amnesty: A path to oblivion for GOP

Marco Rubio obviously fell in with a bad lot on immigration. For a guy who is supposed to be so bright, I cannot understand why he became one of the New Gang of Eight? It’s bad enough that he lined up with a loser like John McCain, but there is no excuse for partnering with guys like Upchuck Schumer, Dirty Dick Durbin, and “Hookers” Menendez on the immigration issue.

Remember when McCain teamed up on amnesty with that paragon of virtue Ted Kennedy. They developed a plan for immigration “reform” they said wasn’t amnesty when clearly it was. Kennedy has since shuffled off to places unknown. That isn’t stopping McCain from having another go at the same old crap. The justification for amnesty seems to be that Republicans are losing Hispanic voters. McCain never explained how Republicans can lose a voting bloc they never had.

And why in hell would Upchuck, Dirty Dick, Hookers Menendez, or any Democrat help Republicans win over Hispanic voters?

Next

Mark Twain famously said “The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.” That is an apt quote for Tea Partiers.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QuoKNZjr8_U]Frankenstein "It's Alive" Scene - YouTube[/ame]​

Democrat and Republicans always saw the Tea Party Movement as the Frankenstein monster. Happily, the “monster” is alive and terrorizing both parties.

Those who wrote Tea Party obituaries crowed “national ambitions” were buried with the corpse. Presumably, they meant presidential ambitions. I won’t argue for presidential aspirations, but I’m here to tell you the Tea Party Movement is in a position to do some serious ass-kicking.

Unemployment, raising the debt ceiling again and again, taxes, repealing Obamacare, and the global warming scam when taken in the aggregate will bury the disparate voting blocs the Democrat party needs to win House and Senate seats. Add amnesty and gun control fraud to the total picture and you will see an awful lot of animation in a “dead” Tea Party Movement.

I’m not claiming liberals will lose every seat. I’m saying racial politics, class warfare, the politics of hate, divide and rule will not work everywhere for Democrats as they did in the past. The parasite class, voting blocs in a few congressional districts, and even Senate seats in liberal states like California, NY, Massachusetts, etc. will keep Socialists in the game —— at least until the tax on income is repealed. That happy event has to remain at the top of the list of “Things to do” until Tea Party conservatives are solidly entrenched. Then, and only then, should Tea Partiers start getting serious about taking the White House. In the normal course of events president material will have emerged based on track records in state governments and Congress.

NOTE: It was the Republican party that failed to win the Senate in 2012. I firmly believe party decision makers did not want the Senate. In fact, Karl Rove is back on FOX spouting the crap that lost Senate seats. The way it is now bipartisan legislation will implement welfare state objectives while Democrats take the blame. If Republicans had both Houses of Congress they would get blamed for doing the same things Hussein is going to do.

Finally, Sarah Palin parted company with FOX News. From the day she signed on with FOX, I said the association was not good for her or for conservatism. Her time as a FOX contributor did nothing to advance conservative ideals. In fact, she was doing a lot better for the Tea Party Movement before she hooked up with FOX. Bottom line: It was a marriage separated in heaven.
 
Last edited:
Why are you surprised that Marco Rubio is for amnesty said in a different way? his predecessor Mel Martinez <R> was all for McCains original Immigration reform.
First Rubio is cuban and therefore hispanic and second buy pushing immigration reform it assures him a solid permanent voting block for him.
The GOP has a huge dilemna and that if they dont back immigration reform and blow off rubio they will lose the hispanic vote for decades, if they support it they are going to piss off a large portion of their base and they may still NOT get the hispanic vote.
All you conservatives need to remember one thing...you have no one else but your hero to blame for this mess. Reagan gave millions of illegals amnesty and did nothing to close the border and therefore he encouraged a huge INCREASE in illegal immigration because at that time his constituency wanted the workforce diluted to control wages for all working americans.
 
At least Reagan knew amnesty was a mistake and recognized that democrats lied when they said the border would be enforced.
 
RightNorLeft;6750052

The GOP has a huge dilemna and that if they dont back immigration reform and blow off rubio they will lose the hispanic vote for decades, if they support it they are going to piss off a large portion of their base and they may still NOT get the hispanic vote.

To RightNorLeft: The GOP will never get the Hispanic vote.

And you’re confusing the Democrat party’s base with law-abiding Americans who make up the GOP’s base. I’d like to piss off the Democrat party’s base the same way President Eisenhower did it:


How Eisenhower solved illegal border crossings from Mexico
By John Dillin / July 6, 2006

How Eisenhower solved illegal border crossings from Mexico / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

RightNorLeft;6750052

All you conservatives need to remember one thing...you have no one else but your hero to blame for this mess.

To RightNorLeft: All you liberals need to remember is that most illegal aliens come from a country where the law means nothing. If that is the kind of society they want they are free to go back where they came from.

RightNorLeft;6750052

Reagan gave millions of illegals amnesty and did nothing to close the border and therefore he encouraged a huge INCREASE in illegal immigration because at that time his constituency wanted the workforce diluted to control wages for all working americans.

To RightNorLeft: Get your facts straight. RR made a deal with Democrats. He agreed to amnesty and citizenship for approximately 3 million illegals. Democrats agreed to stop illegal immigration. RR kept his part of the bargain. Of course, Democrats reneged on their end of the deal. They not only reneged they set a precedent for the next wave’s amnesty.

Incidentally, how many Hispanic voters did RR’s amnesty get for the GOP?

If 12 million illegal aliens get amnesty that will be the end of America’s sovereignty which is what Democrats have been aiming for since the LBJ years.

Parenthetically, if Democrats are saying 11 to 12 million illegals will get amnesty the final number will be closer to twenty. Back in 2007 estimates were put between 12 and 20 million. Nowadays, you never hear the media say the number might be as high as 20 million.

Remember that LBJ and the foulest piece of garbage to ever serve in the Senate, Ted Kennedy, turned immigration into an affirmative action program based on race. Note that LBJ also served in the Senate before becoming vice president.

My point: Because of Eisenhower’s mass deportations LBJ and Ted Kennedy set open borders in motion. Global government was the motive. Using open borders to abolish America’s independence was, and is, essential before a global government can be established. Illegal immigration followed by amnesty is an important ingredient in the New World Order crowd’s agenda.

Incidentally, Marco Rubio has eligibility problems. He was born in this country, but his parents were not citizens at the time of his birth. Abolishing the Eligibility Clause in the Constitution once and for all is the main reason the media pushes Rubio. Legitimate Rubio’s eligibility and you do the same for Hussein.

Bobby Jindal has the same eligibility problem as Rubio, only his parents came from India. The media would push him just as hard they push Rubio if there were as many illegal alien Indians in this country as there are Hispanics.
 
The House & Senate are ripe for plucking in 2014. When you look at how the same tired old Republican gurus like Karl Rove are standing pat on a losing hand, I don’t see how Tea Party conservatives can miss picking up seats in the House and taking control of the Senate. Tea Partiers cannot miss so long as they do NOT

first, why do you think what you have to say is so important that it needs to be bolded?

second, the teatards are the REASON you lost the presidency, lost more seats in the senate and lost seats in the house. you would have lost the house totally but for gerrymandering, but that's life.

finally palin didn't divorce fauxnews. faunews dumped her.

like most rightwingnut extremists your grasp on reality is pretty weak.
 
The House & Senate are ripe for plucking in 2014. When you look at how the same tired old Republican gurus like Karl Rove are standing pat on a losing hand, I don’t see how Tea Party conservatives can miss picking up seats in the House and taking control of the Senate. Tea Partiers cannot miss so long as they do NOT

first, why do you think what you have to say is so important that it needs to be bolded?

second, the teatards are the REASON you lost the presidency, lost more seats in the senate and lost seats in the house. you would have lost the house totally but for gerrymandering, but that's life.

finally palin didn't divorce fauxnews. faunews dumped her.

like most rightwingnut extremists your grasp on reality is pretty weak.

teatards jilly, and you call yourself a lawyer
You don't know the reasons they lost seats so don't pretend you do, and what skin off your ass if Palin was dumped? but you don't know that as a fact either, do you?
 
Pat Buchanan cuts to the chase:

Republican capitulation on amnesty is not going to win Hispanic votes, but it will demoralize the party base. McCain, the amnesty champion today and in 2007, got 31 percent of the Hispanic vote against Obama.

Why is he an expert on what the party should do?

When those 11 million illegals have completed their path to citizenship and become voters, why should they, or the millions more family members they will have brought in by then, vote for the GOP? Hispanics are not small-government people. They believe in and benefit disproportionately from Big Government.

XXXXX

A Pew Hispanic poll found that by 3-to-1, Hispanics would favor a big government with more services to a small government with fewer services.

Why would these folks vote for a Republican Party that promises to downsize the Big Government upon which they depend for sustenance, security and survival? Why would they vote for a party that is going to cut capital gains, income and inheritance taxes they don’t pay?

The 11 million illegals, who came with nothing, are poorer than the Hispanics who are already citizens.

When we make citizens of them and the family members they bring in, our welfare state will explode and the social safety net will sag under the weight of millions of new beneficiaries.

Let me know if you ever hear a talking head tie amnesty to losing sovereignty forever. So far, Pat Buchanan is the only one with a national voice who has the courage to say this:

And this is about more than economics. It is about our sovereignty, our security, our national culture and our national identity.

To be fair & balanced I have to admit that Mr. Buchanan goes too far in this final excerpt:

This fight is not yet lost, and even should we lose, is it not better to go down fighting than to ask for terms from Barack Obama?

How dare P. B. suggest fighting Hussein the Magnificent on amnesty. Republicans in Congress will not do it. Buchanan should not expect disenfranchised Americans to do it either.

Here’s the link to the full article:


GOP's amnesty caucus raises the white flag
Pat Buchanan: Republicans won't win Hispanics by capitulating to Obama
Published: 10 hours ago
by PATRICK J. BUCHANAN

GOP?s amnesty caucus raises the white flag
 
Quote from #5 permalink

Parenthetically, if Democrats are saying 11 to 12 million illegals will get amnesty the final number will be closer to twenty. Back in 2007 estimates were put between 12 and 20 million. Nowadays, you never hear the media say the number might be as high as 20 million.

Happy, happy. Laura Ingraham threw dirt in the game on FOX News Sunday when she said 18 million:

And then I think the American people who are compassionate, giving, then deal with the people, probably more, closer to 18 million, not 11 million, by the way, but that is the number everyone throws around, then deal with the people who are here illegally.

Capt. Mark Kelly, Wayne LaPierre on chances for compromise in gun control debate | Interviews | Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace - Fox News

Remember the first wave to get amnesty was around 3 million when the Democrats lied like hell to President Reagan; so you know that the amnesty crowd want the 11 million number used. Ingraham’s 18 million is an indication of the number of illegal aliens that will come pouring in on the next wave.
 
Flanders! Did you ever write under the screen name flanders1111 years ago? I used to know a Flanders who had a gift for writing. You do resemble him. - Jeri
 
Flanders! Did you ever write under the screen name flanders1111 years ago? I used to know a Flanders who had a gift for writing. You do resemble him. - Jeri

To Jeremiah: I believe you asked in another thread. You probably missed my reply.

It was probably me. I dropped the numbers years ago. Were you using the same screen name on that board? And did we ever dialogue?
 
You know what the best part about amnesty is? It'll drive everyone's wages down.

And that's a good thing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top