Sarah Palin - Already acting like the Republican Maverick she claims to be.

[Modbert]

Has anybody seen Mr. Open and Mrs. Transparency? | AndrewHalcro.com

Aww she's acting just like Bush and Co already.

Withholding emails from the public with Executive Privilege.

MotherJones Blog: Sarah Palin's Secret Emails

1,100 emails being withheld? Gee if there is nothing to hide then why hide all those?


My money is on something similar to this ending up happening:

White House: Millions of e-mails may be missing - CNN.com

Bush White House e-mail controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RssIN3ustUw]YouTube - Lee Greenwood - God Bless The USA[/ame]

 

[dilloduck]

Has anybody seen Mr. Open and Mrs. Transparency? | AndrewHalcro.com

Aww she's acting just like Bush and Co already.

Withholding emails from the public with Executive Privilege.

MotherJones Blog: Sarah Palin's Secret Emails

1,100 emails being withheld? Gee if there is nothing to hide then why hide all those?


My money is on something similar to this ending up happening:

White House: Millions of e-mails may be missing - CNN.com

Bush White House e-mail controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

YouTube - Lee Greenwood - God Bless The USA

Jesus Christ --you wanna peak in her underwear drawer too !

 

[Modbert]

Jesus Christ --you wanna peak in her underwear drawer too !

Nah I'm good. Though you should get the top three on this page Dillo.

Sarah Palin Action Figures , Sarah Palin Dolls

 

[dilloduck]

Nah I'm good. Though you should get the top three on this page Dillo.

Sarah Palin Action Figures , Sarah Palin Dolls

bah---nothing compared to my blow up Hillary action figure.

 

[Denny Crane]

Has anybody seen Mr. Open and Mrs. Transparency? | AndrewHalcro.com

Aww she's acting just like Bush and Co already.

Withholding emails from the public with Executive Privilege.

MotherJones Blog: Sarah Palin's Secret Emails

1,100 emails being withheld? Gee if there is nothing to hide then why hide all those?


My money is on something similar to this ending up happening:

White House: Millions of e-mails may be missing - CNN.com

Bush White House e-mail controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

YouTube - Lee Greenwood - God Bless The USA

I guess you can you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig huh?

 

[Jeepers]

I guess you can you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig huh?

Your Irony is lost on me.. really.. unless there is no Irony and this comment is just .....

 

[HoleInTheVoid]

A communist propaganda mag is what passes for a legitmate source?

Of course I'm assuming the OP is quite upset about John Kerry not signing a an SF 180 or Little O not releasing his college grades or the material from his time working along side the domestic terrorist Bill Ayers at the Annenberg Project.

Yes, I'm sure these facts trouble the OP enough to give him pause about who he should dutifully vote for.

 

[dilloduck]

Your Irony is lost on me.. really.. unless there is no Irony and this comment is just .....

you are correct --its just ..............!

 

[Modbert]

A communist propaganda mag is what passes for a legitmate source?

Of course I'm assuming the OP is quite upset about John Kerry not signing a an SF 180 or Little O not releasing his college grades or the material from his time working along side the domestic terrorist Bill Ayers at the Annenberg Project.

Yes, I'm sure these facts trouble the OP enough to give him pause about who he should dutifully vote for.

Why must this topic all of a sudden be changed to John Kerry and Barack Obama? That's my question.

How come nobody can answer the question, if she has nothing to hide then why is she withholding 1,100+ emails?

You would just rather try to link Obama with Bill Ayers again instead of talking about this issue.

 

[Denny Crane]

Your Irony is lost on me.. really.. unless there is no Irony and this comment is just .....

It means that Palin has more in common with Bush and company than she cares to admit.

 

[HoleInTheVoid]

Why must this topic all of a sudden be changed to John Kerry and Barack Obama? That's my question.

How come nobody can answer the question, if she has nothing to hide then why is she withholding 1,100+ emails?

You would just rather try to link Obama with Bill Ayers again instead of talking about this issue.

Because your outrage is a hypocritical as it is manufactured.

Why is Gov Palin obligated to release her private communications without subpoena; which could not be obtained because she is not the subject of probable cause in the investigation of a crime?

If your all bent out of shape about seeking deeper answers on candidates don't tell me what's wrong with the people you will never vote for because they aren't part of your socialist ponytailed pipedream; just make sure your own fellow socialists live by the rules you seem to want to impose on others.

 

[Modbert]

Because your outrage is a hypocritical as it is manufactured.

Why is Gov Palin obligated to release her private communications without subpoena; which could not be obtained because she is not the subject of probable cause in the investigation of a crime?

If your all bent out of shape about seeking deeper answers on candidates don't tell me what's wrong with the people you will never vote for because they aren't part of your socialist ponytailed pipedream; just make sure your own fellow socialists live by the rules you seem to want to impose on others.

The first paragraph of your response screams to me that if this was Obama that the press and the GOP would be all over this.

"My socialist ponytailed pipedream" eh? Gee, isn't it great how I'm called a socialist for questioning things!

How dare I want the truth on things since the last Republican Administration that "lost" or didn't reveal emails went into the millions. I'm sure you think there was nothing sensitive or revealing in those emails too?

 

[HoleInTheVoid]

The first paragraph of your response screams to me that if this was Obama that the press and the GOP would be all over this.

"My socialist ponytailed pipedream" eh? Gee, isn't it great how I'm called a socialist for questioning things!

How dare I want the truth on things since the last Republican Administration that "lost" or didn't reveal emails went into the millions. I'm sure you think there was nothing sensitive or revealing in those emails too?

Do free market capitalists frequent Mother Jones?

And no, you do not want the truth. You want to fabricate charges to criminalize those you disagree with on matters of public policy. You have no probable cause that a crime has been committed yet you wish to subject law-abiding citizens to unreasonable search and seizure.

If you are certain Palin is doing something illegal it should be easy for you to obtain a search warrant. Have at it.

Scamper off now, Freedom and Justice need you.

 

[Modbert]

Do free market capitalists frequent Mother Jones?

And no, you do not want the truth. You want to fabricate charges to criminalize those you disagree with on matters of public policy. You have no probable cause that a crime has been committed yet you wish to subject law-abiding citizens to unreasonable search and seizure.

If you are certain Palin is doing something illegal it should be easy for you to obtain a search warrant. Have at it.

Scamper off now, Freedom and Justice need you.

Mother Jones is the best link I could find for this new story. I'm sure you'll see it in all the major news media outlets soon.

Probable Cause? I'm not saying she committed a crime. I'd just like to know why the # of emails that she withheld was over 1,000. Such a large number seems odd to me since it's just one person sending such emails.

If you really want to spin this into I'm trying to take away her 4th amendment rights then you might as well grab a couple children, a flag and start singing "God Bless of America" because your just trying to take the moral high ground.

I didn't know asking a question or two broke the 4th amendment, or asking a question requires a search warrant. Though plenty of things have changed since Sarah Palin became the VP nominee I guess.

 

[HoleInTheVoid]

Mother Jones is the best link I could find for this new story.

No doubt.

I'm sure you'll see it in all the major news media outlets soon.

Doubt.

Still I'll applaud your faith. But please ell us Mr Free-Market Capitalist, how long have you been reading Mother Jones?

Probable Cause? I'm not saying she committed a crime. I'd just like to know why the # of emails that she withheld was over 1,000. Such a large number seems odd to me since it's just one person sending such emails.

A thousand emails is not extraordinary.

I was on orders for 4 months and had over 300 emails piled up.

If you really want to spin this into I'm trying to take away her 4th amendment rights then you might as well grab a couple children, a flag and start singing "God Bless of America" because your just trying to take the moral high ground.

But you are. You already admitted she is not suspect to any criminal charges yet you seem to think you're entitled to read her personal and professional correspondence as if she is somehow obligated to prove herself innocent...to you and Mother Jones of all people.

Not that she ever could. You only wish to see her emails so something--ANYthing--can be contorted into another shameless faux outrage.

I didn't know asking a question or two broke the 4th amendment, or asking a question requires a search warrant. Though plenty of things have changed since Sarah Palin became the VP nominee I guess.

Nothing changed. No republican demands to see Obama's emails. This is just your histrionics again.

 

[Chris]

No doubt.


Doubt.

Still I'll applaud your faith. But please ell us Mr Free-Market Capitalist, how long have you been reading Mother Jones?


A thousand emails is not extraordinary.

I was on orders for 4 months and had over 300 emails piled up.


But you are. You already admitted she is not suspect to any criminal charges yet you seem to think you're entitled to read her personal and professional correspondence as if she is somehow obligated to prove herself innocent...to you and Mother Jones of all people.

Not that she ever could. You only wish to see her emails so something--ANYthing--can be contorted into another shameless faux outrage.


Nothing changed. No republican demands to see Obama's emails. This is just your histrionics again.

The prosecutor appointed by unanimous vote of the Alaskan legislature is going to meet on Friday to decide who to issue subpoenas to. He already has audio tapes, emails, and multiple witnesses that will testify that Palin abused her power as governor. She is guilty as hell.

 

[Silence]

A communist propaganda mag is what passes for a legitmate source?

Of course I'm assuming the OP is quite upset about John Kerry not signing a an SF 180 or Little O not releasing his college grades or the material from his time working along side the domestic terrorist Bill Ayers at the Annenberg Project.

Yes, I'm sure these facts trouble the OP enough to give him pause about who he should dutifully vote for.

hey, you, fucktard.... yeah I'm talking to you...the dumbass who wandered into a thread about Sarah Palin and started talking about everything but Sarah Palin... stay on topic or get the fuck out...

It was a REPUBLICAN who started this investigation because he suspected Palin's staff was participating in partisan activities while on government time so he filed a request for public access to the emails.

She's claiming executive privilege even though she cc'd Todd Palin on a good portion of those emails and those emails were pertaining to former rivals and journalists.

 

[Gunny]

The prosecutor appointed by unanimous vote of the Alaskan legislature is going to meet on Friday to decide who to issue subpoenas to. He already has audio tapes, emails, and multiple witnesses that will testify that Palin abused her power as governor. She is guilty as hell.

Thank you for the update, Greta van Susteren. I'm sure we can count on you to give is the sneeze-by-yawn play.

On second thought, Nancy Grace suits you better. The two of you have the same amount of objectivity from pronouncing guilt from the second an accusation is made, to ranting throughout the entire process.

 

[Modbert]

hey, you, fucktard.... yeah I'm talking to you...the dumbass who wandered into a thread about Sarah Palin and started talking about everything but Sarah Palin... stay on topic or get the fuck out...

It was a REPUBLICAN who started this investigation because he suspected Palin's staff was participating in partisan activities while on government time so he filed a request for public access to the emails.

She's claiming executive privilege even though she cc'd Todd Palin on a good portion of those emails and those emails were pertaining to former rivals and journalists.

 

[Modbert]

Thank you for the update, Greta van Susteren. I'm sure we can count on you to give is the sneeze-by-yawn play.

On second thought, Nancy Grace suits you better. The two of you have the same amount of objectivity from pronouncing guilt from the second an accusation is made, to ranting throughout the entire process.

Gunny, looks like me and you have something else in common.

Unless I misread that response and you can actually stand Nancy Grace.