Sanders Tweets 'How Many Yachts Do Billionaires Need? How Many Cars?

[OnePercenter]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.

Eighty percent of American workers don't get paid enough to deduct mortgage interest.

So that means only 20% do? Well then........ if there is any truth to that, I should be rolling in the money since the 80% are on rent or some sort of alternative living, because anybody paying a mortgage currently gets that tax write-off. People should be pounding my door down to get an apartment at any price.

Just because people don't qualify for the mortgage tax deduction doesn't preclude them from buying homes. After all, 'It's the American Dream!'

The problem with buying homes today are they're almost all over-priced.

 

[g5000]

I provided a link to the 35 page Republican tax reform plan many times on this forum, including above in this topic.

Not one pseudocon will read it. Because it is longer than a tweet.

They have never read it. Ever.

And they will continue to parrot the $1.4 trillion lie.

Here's my plan where everyone wins....


-Base Federal tax for corporations at 30% of revenue.

-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2017 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.

-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.

-Companies with 1000 employees or less, employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.

-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2017 price structure.

-Remove the FICA limit.

-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.

-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.

-Make inversion illegal.

My plan would reduce small business costs for employees and taxes to 30%. That's a 15%-30% drop.

My plan would put BILLIONS into the economy daily.

My plan would put the $100 trillion plus currently owned by corporate America back into the economy.

My plan would end all welfare.

My plan would significantly increase social security and pension payments.

My plan would hold prices for 10 years, thus eliminating inflation.

I have a much simpler plan.

Raise the Social Security and Medicare eligibility ages to 70 and index to 9 percent of the population going forward. We are living decades longer than our ancestors, we should be working longer. Common sense.

Eliminate all individual tax expenditures, and most business expenditures. Then we can lower tax rates for EVERYONE, and still have a budget surplus. After we use the surplus to pay down the debt, lower tax rates for everyone even more.

We should be buying our health insurance the same way we buy our home, auto, and life insurance. This would give the consumer the maximum bargaining leverage which the government currently denies them.

Included in the elimination of all tax expenditures would be the elimination of the employer sponsored health insurance exemption. That would disincentivize this driver of upward costs. That exemption is a huge boondoggle which needs to end.

This plan would have at least three major effects:

1. Cheaper health insurance.

2. Lower tax rates and a balanced budget.

3. Instantaneous campaign finance reform that actually works. If tax expenditures are banned, you have no incentive to bribe a Congressman to put a tax break in the tax code since it isn't allowed.

 

[OnePercenter]

All I can say is thank our GOD this symbol of hypocrisy and weakness wasn't elected POUS. Can you imagine our state of affairs in 4-8 years with this guy? If you want everything that doesn't work and nothing accomplished, Sanders is an ideal candidate.

Sanders believes that the American worker isn't making enough money. That IS true.

 

[bripat9643]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.

See? The tards have been convinced they are getting to keep more of their money! What a beautiful scam.

What innumerate tards like bripat don't get is that every tax deduction, credit, or exemption HAS TO BE MADE UP FOR WITH HIGHER TAX RATES.

That's right. They are no different than food stamps. They are government gifts paid for by every taxpayer. Our rates are as high as they are because of the $1.4 trillion in government gifts these poor dumb bastards take.

And when you read the current Republican individual and business tax reform plans, they make this fact very, very clear.

Tards like bripat obviously have not gotten the memo.

You aren't proposing to lower rates, douche bag. You only want to eliminate deductions. The net effect is a tax increase.

Go fuck yourself.

 

[bripat9643]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.

Eighty percent of American workers don't get paid enough to deduct mortgage interest.

That's right. The more wealth you have, the bigger the government gift you get from the MID.

The MID adds an average of 13 percent to the price of your house. And who benefits from higher home prices?

The builders, the banks, and the brokers. That's why they spend so much money on lobbying and campaign contributions to keep the MID alive.

What is 'MID?'

Mortgage Interest Deduction.

The MID alone transfers an extra $80 billion to homebuilders and bankers out of the pockets of homeowners.

Every year.

And the ignorant herd has been fooled into bleeving they are getting to keep more of their own money. Jesus!

Homeowners do get to keep more of their money, moron.

 

[Jarlaxle]

True, but if I were President today, I would be pushing this country into a four day work week.

You drive to work and put in an 8 hour day. Wouldn't it be better to put in two extra hours and work four days instead?

Think of the fuel savings. One less day of rush hour. One less day of busses and trains running. Some people travel 30,40,50 miles to get to work everyday. Their savings would really add up at the end of the month.

Who would object? The environmentalists can't object because a four day work week would result in less pollution. The right can't object because the decrease in fuel would lower the price at the pump. Families would welcome the idea because nearly everybody would have a three day weekend to spend together.

I would object...I do not want to lose the pay!

Perhaps you misunderstood. My idea is for Americans to work 4-10 hour days instead of 5-8 hour days. If you put in OT, then of course that has to be considered. Companies that work 6-8 hour days could be cut to 5-10 hour days and so on.

It couldn't apply to everybody just like 5-8 hour days we have today, but 5-8 hour days are considered the standard that the majority live by.

I haven't worked an 8 hour day in ten years.

Well like I said, one rule can't apply to everybody just like it doesn't apply to everybody today. But for those that do work 5-10 hour days, I think it would be great to change that standard.

Are you paid for all 50 hours, or is your employer taking advantage of you?

Damn right I am paid for all my work...I wouldn't do it otherwise.

 

[OnePercenter]

I provided a link to the 35 page Republican tax reform plan many times on this forum, including above in this topic.

Not one pseudocon will read it. Because it is longer than a tweet.

They have never read it. Ever.

And they will continue to parrot the $1.4 trillion lie.

Here's my plan where everyone wins....


-Base Federal tax for corporations at 30% of revenue.

-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2017 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.

-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.

-Companies with 1000 employees or less, employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.

-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2017 price structure.

-Remove the FICA limit.

-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.

-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.

-Make inversion illegal.

My plan would reduce small business costs for employees and taxes to 30%. That's a 15%-30% drop.

My plan would put BILLIONS into the economy daily.

My plan would put the $100 trillion plus currently owned by corporate America back into the economy.

My plan would end all welfare.

My plan would significantly increase social security and pension payments.

My plan would hold prices for 10 years, thus eliminating inflation.

I have a much simpler plan.

Raise the Social Security and Medicare eligibility ages to 70 and index to 9 percent of the population going forward. We are living decades longer than our ancestors, we should be working longer. Common sense.

Eliminate all individual tax expenditures, and most business expenditures. Then we can lower tax rates for EVERYONE, and still have a budget surplus. After we use the surplus to pay down the debt, lower tax rates for everyone even more.

We should be buying our health insurance the same way we buy our home, auto, and life insurance. Included in the elimination of all tax expenditures would be the elimination of the employer sponsored health insurance exemption. That would disincentivize this driver of upward costs. That exemption is a huge boondoggle which needs to end.

This plan would have at least three major effects:

1. Cheaper health insurance.

2. Lower tax rates and a balanced budget.

3. Instantaneous campaign finance reform that actually works. If tax expenditures are banned, you have no incentive to bribe a Congressman to put a tax break in the tax code since isn't allowed to.

Raise the Social Security and Medicare eligibility ages to 70 and index to 9 percent of the population going forward. We are living decades longer than our ancestors, we should be working longer. Common sense.

I don't believe in the 'work 'til your dead' mantra.

 

[Jarlaxle]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.

Eighty percent of American workers don't get paid enough to deduct mortgage interest.

More accurately: interest rates have been so low lately it often simply is not worth it to do so.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

His vacation home was inherited by his wife when her parents died, she swapped it for a cottage closer to where they live so they can utilize it.

Not one of the news articles have ever said inherited, it's all he purchased. But if that's the theme you're going for then why would you insist everyone but him have their inheritance taxed so the wealth can't be just given to someone like...Oh, I don't know maybe a senator who never made a dime on his own and should be the least deserving of any inheritance? Shouldn't the government get that property?

If the yacht had a US flag flying you might be correct, but, say the yacht is flying under one of many foreign flags, the US would have no authority under maritime law.

A Senator NEVER makes a dime on his own?

What yacht? We are talking about the socialist Sanders and his THIRD home. And yes he has never made any money in the private sector. He went from welfare and food stamps to ...well, better welfare with a fancy government title and no work requirement.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

If employees were better paid we'd not have a $20T debt.

It is ill-gotten gains.

How do you figure that????

 

[gipper]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.

Eighty percent of American workers don't get paid enough to deduct mortgage interest.

If one has a mortgage they can deduct the interest, no matter what their income is.

 

[Jarlaxle]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.

Eighty percent of American workers don't get paid enough to deduct mortgage interest.

So that means only 20% do? Well then........ if there is any truth to that, I should be rolling in the money since the 80% are on rent or some sort of alternative living, because anybody paying a mortgage currently gets that tax write-off. People should be pounding my door down to get an apartment at any price.

Just because people don't qualify for the mortgage tax deduction doesn't preclude them from buying homes. After all, 'It's the American Dream!'

The problem with buying homes today are they're almost all over-priced.

I dumped mine because the taxes were as much as the damn mortgage. Happy I did it...I didn't realize how much work a house was until I stopped doing it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

All I can say is thank our GOD this symbol of hypocrisy and weakness wasn't elected POUS. Can you imagine our state of affairs in 4-8 years with this guy? If you want everything that doesn't work and nothing accomplished, Sanders is an ideal candidate.

Sanders believes that the American worker isn't making enough money. That IS true.

Then it's up to the American worker to do something about that--not the government.

 

[Jarlaxle]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

If employees were better paid we'd not have a $20T debt.

It is ill-gotten gains.

How do you figure that????

That is what the voices in his head told the mouse in his pocket.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.

Eighty percent of American workers don't get paid enough to deduct mortgage interest.

So that means only 20% do? Well then........ if there is any truth to that, I should be rolling in the money since the 80% are on rent or some sort of alternative living, because anybody paying a mortgage currently gets that tax write-off. People should be pounding my door down to get an apartment at any price.

Just because people don't qualify for the mortgage tax deduction doesn't preclude them from buying homes. After all, 'It's the American Dream!'

The problem with buying homes today are they're almost all over-priced.

I dumped mine because the taxes were as much as the damn mortgage. Happy I did it...I didn't realize how much work a house was until I stopped doing it.

That is the trend in America today. Great for us landlords. But most give up home ownership because of all the things that break in the home they don't know how to repair or it costs too much to repair.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

True, but if I were President today, I would be pushing this country into a four day work week.

You drive to work and put in an 8 hour day. Wouldn't it be better to put in two extra hours and work four days instead?

Think of the fuel savings. One less day of rush hour. One less day of busses and trains running. Some people travel 30,40,50 miles to get to work everyday. Their savings would really add up at the end of the month.

Who would object? The environmentalists can't object because a four day work week would result in less pollution. The right can't object because the decrease in fuel would lower the price at the pump. Families would welcome the idea because nearly everybody would have a three day weekend to spend together.

I would object...I do not want to lose the pay!

Perhaps you misunderstood. My idea is for Americans to work 4-10 hour days instead of 5-8 hour days. If you put in OT, then of course that has to be considered. Companies that work 6-8 hour days could be cut to 5-10 hour days and so on.

It couldn't apply to everybody just like 5-8 hour days we have today, but 5-8 hour days are considered the standard that the majority live by.

I haven't worked an 8 hour day in ten years.

Well like I said, one rule can't apply to everybody just like it doesn't apply to everybody today. But for those that do work 5-10 hour days, I think it would be great to change that standard.

Are you paid for all 50 hours, or is your employer taking advantage of you?

What???? What does that have to do with what I was talking about? Explain please.

 

[TheDude]

All I can say is thank our GOD this symbol of hypocrisy and weakness wasn't elected POUS. Can you imagine our state of affairs in 4-8 years with this guy? If you want everything that doesn't work and nothing accomplished, Sanders is an ideal candidate.

Sanders believes that the American worker isn't making enough money. That IS true.

And his policies would make matters FAR FAR FAR worse.

 

[Jarlaxle]

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.

Eighty percent of American workers don't get paid enough to deduct mortgage interest.

So that means only 20% do? Well then........ if there is any truth to that, I should be rolling in the money since the 80% are on rent or some sort of alternative living, because anybody paying a mortgage currently gets that tax write-off. People should be pounding my door down to get an apartment at any price.

Just because people don't qualify for the mortgage tax deduction doesn't preclude them from buying homes. After all, 'It's the American Dream!'

The problem with buying homes today are they're almost all over-priced.

I dumped mine because the taxes were as much as the damn mortgage. Happy I did it...I didn't realize how much work a house was until I stopped doing it.

That is the trend in America today. Great for us landlords. But most give up home ownership because of all the things that break in the home they don't know how to repair or it costs too much to repair.

I'm in a nice apartment-with full garage-for not much more than just my property taxes. Bonus: utility bills are much lower now.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

"Vermont magazine Seven Days reported Tuesday that the 74-year-old senator and his wife, Jane Sanders, have purchased a four-bedroom house on the shore of Lake Champlain for roughly $600,000. Jane told Seven Days that they had recently sold a house in Maine that had belonged to her family since the 1900s, and used the proceeds to purchase the new property, which is located in North Hero (population 803, as of the 2010 census). With this purchase, Sanders now owns at least three houses, the others being in Burlington, VT, and Capitol Hill in D.C."

One must always remember that the people advocating things like socialism never intend it for themselves. Just us lil folk.

Of course. The Socialist/ Communist way is for nobody to have money except for people in government.

Doesn't the company you work have any directly or indirectly publicly funded contracts? That would make you one of the people you hate.

No, we don't. All our customers are private businesses just like us.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

View attachment 122629

Twitterers respond with how many houses do you need?
Once again, the lack of self awareness of the left is mind boggling.

Sanders Asks How Many Yachts Billionaires Need, Twitter Asks How Many Houses He Needs

Dude, he's a socialist.

Did you say something about lack of awareness?

You do realize that yachts are a tax dodge. They're an excellent way to bring monies to the US without paying tax.

You mean something like what John Kerry did?

No at all. Kerry's yacht broker who charters his boat when he wasn't using it to off-set the costs moved the boat to their location. Nothing illegal, just perceived illegal by the deceivers and eaten up by the ignorant.

I never said it was illegal. He did store his boat where the taxes were cheaper.